Denton Van Zan Vs. the Wood-chipper from Fargo

Started by -Pr-137 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
They aren't but I can support it. Your no it isn't and inability to understand words like reboot and formula isn't really debating.

Should I find another one ? If you feel the formula is the same you didn't see the originals.

My opinion is my own but is always logical and correct. 🙂

lol.

I never said the formula was the same, just that it isn't as different as you think it is.

Only you would think that, but that's okay. You can be KMC's official Bandwagon Trekkie if that makes you happy.

Originally posted by -Pr-
lol.

I never said the formula was the same, just that it isn't as different as you think it is.

Only you would think that, but that's okay. You can be KMC's official Bandwagon Trekkie if that makes you happy.

Oh now it isn't that different. Lol. You keep changing your stance. It's night and day different. Mythos is cool when done right as proven by Abrams.

I love the reboots. You older Trekkies don't. I'm a bigger fan of new school you shouldn't let it bother you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Oh now it isn't that different. Lol. You keep changing your stance. It's night and day different. Mythos is cool when done right as proven by Abrams.

I love the reboots. You older Trekkies don't. I'm a bigger fan of new school you shouldn't let it bother you.

I haven't changed my stance at all; you've just been misreading me.

I love the reboot more than you, I'm guessing. I'd say I have more appreciation for it too, even if we're just talking about the first movie.

lol, your baiting is transparent, but I'm sure you'll tell yourself that it isn't.

When you're ready to talk to real Star Trek reboot fans, we'll be here.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your the old school Trekkie whereas I'm the new school. Reboot Khan over old school Kirk any day of the week.

Bandwagon-boys like you are silly. "If I love one I have to hate the other, even though I've not seen any of the older shows/movies."

Protip: Liking one doesn't mean you can't also like the other

Then again, you just claimed exposition in films was bad, so you're clearly illogical.

Originally posted by Robtard
Bandwagon-boys like you are silly. "If I love one I have to hate the other, even though I've not seen any of the older shows/movies."

Protip: Liking one doesn't mean you can't also like the other

Then again, you just claimed exposition in films was bad, so you're clearly illogical.

I have seen the originals. Keep claiming I never see anything. Troll 101. I love new ones more as proven by favorite Star Trek thread. Jump in line and support Wrath of Khan. Not me. I'm a leader and think for myself.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have seen the originals. Keep claiming I never see anything. Troll 101.

I love new ones more as proven by favorite Star Trek thread. Jump in line and support Wrath of Khan. Not me. I'm a leader and think for myself.

Stop lying, you showed you haven't with your ToS/TNG film ignorance.

You're a bandwagon-boy who thinks exposition in a film is a bad idea.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying, you showed you haven't with your ToS/TNG film ignorance.

You're a bandwagon-boy who thinks exposition in a film is a bad idea.

Too much exposition and too little action. You need a better formula aka Abrams which pulls it off.

Battlezone me Data versus Khan if you feel otherwise. If I'm ignorant it'll be an easy win for you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Too much exposition and too little action. You need a better formula aka Abrams which pulls it off.

Battlezone me Data versus Khan if you feel otherwise. If I'm ignorant it'll be an easy win for you.

Bandwagon-boi who hasn't seen the ToS/TnG films making more silly blanket claims.

I told you long ago I have no interest in your silly BZ nonsense, especially matches we've already debated in, no need for repeat threads. Stop begging for more of my time, it's pathetic, Bandwagon-boi.

Originally posted by Robtard
Bandwagon-boi who hasn't seen the ToS/TnG films making more silly blanket claims.

I told you long ago I have no interest in your silly BZ nonsense, especially matches we've already debated in, no need for repeat threads. Stop begging for more of my time, it's pathetic, Bandwagon-boi.

Yes, you back down while hurling insults in a manner you aren't held accountable. You think,saying you don't see the movies is debating.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, you back down while hurling insults in a manner you aren't held accountable. You think,saying you don't see the movies is debating.

Here you go and stop crying for attention in repeat matches you already failed to prove your case in:

Originally posted by Robtard
I told you long ago I have no interest in your silly BZ nonsense, especially matches we've already debated in, no need for repeat threads. Stop begging for more of my time, it's pathetic, Bandwagon-boi.

Originally posted by Robtard
Here you go and stop crying for attention in repeat matches you already failed to prove your case in:
Nothing I said was inaccurate but one post doesn't do the progression of discussion justice here. I already told you the reasoning and you want to just repeat yourself in a trollish fashion.

You don't get to apply your gay battlezone rules to these threads.

Stupid clown

Originally posted by focus4chumps
You don't get to apply your gay battlezone rules to these threads.

Stupid clown

I already corrected him. Stop with the crying. You claim to be a man so act like one.

just stop applying your stupid BZ rules to regular versus thread. the reason why nobody will "step up" is because its gay and nobody cares.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
just stop applying your stupid BZ rules to regular versus thread. the reason why nobody will "step up" is because its gay and nobody cares.
Someome already stepped up. Reason you won't is cowardice. Keep running.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Someome already stepped up. Reason you won't is cowardice. Keep running.

fine. keep your clownshit in that thread.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I haven't changed my stance at all; you've just been misreading me.

I love the reboot more than you, I'm guessing. I'd say I have more appreciation for it too, even if we're just talking about the first movie.

lol, your baiting is transparent, but I'm sure you'll tell yourself that it isn't.

When you're ready to talk to real Star Trek reboot fans, we'll be here.

Yes, you have. First not a restart then not a different formula.

Nope. You haven't even seen the second film. I've seen it multiple times. You also prefer the original. Not even close.

No, you're an original fan who doesn't even care to see the sequel unlike. Yet I
saw it midnight as soon as I could.

My fave film is this one and I like the original reboot far better than any original film.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
fine. keep your clownshit in that thread.
Oh right this is the ultra serious wood chipper thread. Point proven.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Oh right this is the ultra serious wood chipper thread. Point proven.

your stupid special rule of "if it didnt happen on screen in the same ridiculously marginalized context, it doesnt count" is ridiculous and you are ridiculous for imposing it in a non-BZ thread.

look, i respect this silly BZ hobby of yours, and thats why i dont piss on your 'special' threads. but you dont get to decide that BZ rules apply everywhere. so stfu.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
your stupid special rule of "if it didnt happen on screen in the same ridiculously marginalized context, it doesnt count" is ridiculous and you are ridiculous for imposing it in a non-BZ thread.

look, i respect this silly BZ hobby of yours, and thats why i dont piss on your 'special' threads. but you dont get to decide that BZ rules apply everywhere. so stfu.

I argue in character but you acting like its a power set ignores the characters themselves. I don't expect you to grasp this but I dare to dream.