Denton Van Zan Vs. the Wood-chipper from Fargo

Started by focus4chumps137 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
Same yawn worthy responses. It's all you have.

worthy as your pathetic google-chimp-win routine and "concession accepted"

dance

mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1mikejackson1

Originally posted by Lestov16
Congrats. You trollbait people out of pathetic butthurt because you have you have the emotional strength of a patron of Weenie Hut Juniors.

Page 63 and your trollrage is still goin strong, butthurt boi. Please continue to embarrass yourself more 😆

If I knew of any family members of his I'd contact them immediately. He needs help. He just doesn't see it. An obsession with clowns and lipstick woman fetishes.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nope. Thread served its purpose.

The thread served it's purpose on page 2 when DP accepted, but you didn't go running to have it closed until page 20. Because you were getting destroyed in the debate.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The thread served it's purpose on page 2 when DP accepted, but you didn't go running to have it closed until page 20. Because you were getting destroyed in the debate.
I was shocked people kept responding. Once a challenge is accepted outside the challenger no one should post. I had no choice but to take action.

You guys troll Quanchi with 64-page butthurt threads like this, and then are amazed when Imp allows Quan to get away with the stuff he does.

You were so shocked that you kept posting for 18 pages? That has got to be the most pathetic excuse I have ever heard.

Originally posted by Lestov16
You guys troll Quanchi with 64-page butthurt threads like this, and then are amazed when Imp allows Quan to get away with the stuff he does.

As this thread was started in response to the multiple threads where quan has trolled the entire board, I guess they figured that since it was allowed, they may as well get their turn.

Originally posted by Lestov16
You guys troll Quanchi with 64-page butthurt threads like this, and then are amazed when Imp allows Quan to get away with the stuff he does.

Except you and Quanchi were trolling WAY before this thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You were so shocked that you kept posting for 18 pages? That has got to be the most pathetic excuse I have ever heard.
Who asked you ?

Originally posted by Lestov16
You guys troll Quanchi with 64-page butthurt threads like this, and then are amazed when Imp allows Quan to get away with the stuff he does.

if quanchi is so emotionally invested in a fantasy action hero as to take it personally, then thats hardly my problem.

im "trolling" an imaginary character by pointing out the fact that was factually ineffectual in accomplishing anything positive toward the final goal than offering an explosive arrow.

sure he pushed the plot forward A LOT by screwing up and making horrible decisions despite even his own best advice. but this is hardly relevant to his usefulness. and then he got himself cornered via bad planning and rage quit.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Except you and Quanchi were trolling WAY before this thread.
This thread is a troll thread. I don't make threads pitting McClane against marriage. You Need to grow up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You were so shocked that you kept posting for 18 pages? That has got to be the most pathetic excuse I have ever heard.
😆

Originally posted by Robtard
😆
Quit riding his coattails.

Originally posted by quanchi112
This thread is a troll thread. I don't make threads pitting McClane against marriage. You Need to grow up.

there we go again with mcclain 🙂

why so mcbutthurt? 🙂

really though this thread is about van zan. 🙂

nice attempt to divert the topic since you have no valid points to offer in this one. 🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
there we go again with mcclain 🙂

why so mcbutthurt? 🙂

really though this thread is about van zan. 🙂

nice attempt to divert the topic since you have no valid points to offer in this one. 🙂

Not mad. This thread was in response to Zans victory over McClane. Try and keep up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not mad. This thread was in response to Zans victory over McClane. Try and keep up.

this thread proves unequivocally that the true driving force in the other topic was not mcclain at all, but rather your obsession with denton van zan.

you should have felt like a ridiculous sucker by page 3. but here we are. 🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
this thread proves unequivocally that the true driving force in the other topic was not mcclain at all, but rather your obsession with denton van zan.

you should have felt like a ridiculous sucker by page 3. but here we are. 🙂

Calm down.

Zan wins just like against McClane.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
if quanchi is so emotionally invested in a fantasy action hero as to take it personally, then thats hardly my problem.

im "trolling" an imaginary character by pointing out the fact that was factually ineffectual in accomplishing anything positive toward the final goal than offering an explosive arrow.

sure he pushed the plot forward A LOT by screwing up and making horrible decisions despite even his own best advice. but this is hardly relevant to his usefulness. and then he got himself cornered via bad planning and rage quit.

Um, no.

You say you're pointing out Van Zan's tactical failures. That's all fine and good. van Zan was never supposed to be a paragon. He was meant to be impulsive, driven irrational by his hunt for GIANT ANTHROPOPHAGIC DRAGONS. His purpose in the film was to give Quinn drive. If you want to say he made mistakes, fine.

That DOES NOT give you the excuse to say that Van Zan is so stupid that he would throw himself in A WOODCHIPPER. It's an obvious troll scenario so ridiculous that only somebody of extreme butthurt would try to support it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Calm down.

after all this time, you can't deal with the fact that you chose to back a very poor bandwagon pony.

this thread is a monument to the failure of denton van zan. posturing clown who corners himself, gets mad about it, and rage quits. now that i wrote that, i can see why you might take his character at such a personal level.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
after all this time, you can't deal with the fact that you chose to back a very poor bandwagon pony.

this thread is a monument to the failure of denton van zan. posturing clown who corners himself, gets mad about it, and rage quits. now that i wrote that, i can see why you might take his character at such a personal level.

Zan wins. Just relax and quit being so emotional. It isn't healthy.