Denton Van Zan Vs. the Wood-chipper from Fargo

Started by Newjak137 pages

Originally posted by focus4chumps
baseless conclusion. unless you believe that people insta-die when they feel suicidal.

he had no other means for jumping into the dragons mouth other than to die. but sure, be silly and try to pass that off as anything but rage-quit suicide. it was a heroic sacrifice, as quanchi likes to state 😂

perhaps he previously felt an obligation to stay alive, being responsible for his men that he got killed anyway. we could theorize about why he rage-quit suicided then as opposed to before, but its all speculation. fact remains though: he rage quit suicide. this was a proven screen feat (as per quanchi's law)

replying to antagonistic thread hijacking is "trolling" ?

sounds like you've got some residual butthurt from our previous encounter 🙂

No but if they are truly suicidal they aren't going to wait until a dragon shows up to do it.

He could have been hoping to wound the dragon. Maybe thought he could have done some damage. Maybe he knew/thought there was no where for him to run and was going to die regardless of what he did. Even if he did do it as a rage-quit suicide how does that equal to him jumping into a woodchipper?

Ah qaunchi's law like I said stupid thread built for a stupid reason.

I honestly for the life me can not remember our previous encounter you are talking about?

Originally posted by Newjak
No but if they are truly suicidal they aren't going to wait until a dragon shows up to do it.

why not? up till that point he was responsible for other people and fancied himself a competent leader. what better time to kill himself when all his failure becomes painfully clear? that last fired arrow was all he had, and he failed at that too.

Originally posted by Newjak
He could have been hoping to wound the dragon. Maybe thought he could have done some damage.

watch the jump slow motion. he doesnt even begin to swing the axe. in fact it seems he intended to elbow it for some stupid reason. no more stupid than hunting it at midnight however, but still...

Originally posted by Newjak
Maybe he knew/thought there was no where for him to run and was going to die regardless of what he did.

except for the same ladder he used to climb up there?

look if you're trying to argue that he was completely stupid in place of suicidal, you might be on to something.

Originally posted by Newjak
Even if he did do it as a rage-quit suicide how does that equal to him jumping into a woodchipper?

another form of rage-quit suicide?

Originally posted by Newjak
Ah qaunchi's law like I said stupid thread built for a stupid reason.

no, i was mocking the "deny/use as-per-convienience" absolutist screen-feat assertion that quanchi started imposing on this forum long after the thread was even posted, so nice try.

in case you're new to 'quanchiisms', allow me to explain:

in the case of vader vs. obiwan, anakin screwed up due to his overconfidence. as per quan logic, thats a screen feat which proves unequivocally that every fight with vader will end up with him being cocky and losing. so vader vs kermit the frog: kermit wins. get it now?

Originally posted by Newjak
I honestly for the life me can not remember our previous encounter you are talking about?

riiiiiight. 😉

Originally posted by focus4chumps
brilliant retort, twink.
If I don't make it simple you'd never understand it.

Originally posted by Robtard
In other words, you were lying and just ****ed the phrase up, cos the iPad wouldn't correct "couldn't" to "could", unless you misspelled it. Did you? 😂
No, the iPad changed it and I wasn't aware until I looked back at the quote.

Originally posted by Lestov16
👆
This is why I love this thread. This proves without a shadow of a doubt how deep inside their skulls I am.

Quan, you deserve virtually every bit of butthurt thrown at you. I'm just defending Van Zan here because it's a disrespect to the character. Dude was a phucking badass and doesn't deserve to be called an idiot, especially a suicidally retarded one, just because he made mistakes fighting monstrous dragons.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Dude was a phucking badass

"badass" is not a feat.

Originally posted by Lestov16
and doesn't deserve to be called an idiot

attacks alpha dragon at midnight, ignoring his own assertion of what a stupid move it was. thats called "stupid".

Originally posted by Lestov16
especially a suicidally retarded one

rather than attempt escape on the ladder, he committed suicide.

Originally posted by Lestov16
just because he made mistakes fighting monstrous dragons.

wow. a breakthrough. you admit some folly on his part. baby steps toward the truth, which proves you at least more capable of some level of reasoning. small wonder you and quan are drifting apart. 🙁

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, the iPad changed it and I wasn't aware until I looked back at the quote.

Why would the iPad change a supposedly properly spelled word in a grammar correct sentence? (it wouldn't)

Do some more flips now, cos you're a child who's incapable of owning up to anything.

just to be safe, im never getting an ipad.

maybe quan's not lying and it really does kills neurons.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Quan, you deserve virtually every bit of butthurt thrown at you. I'm just defending Van Zan here because it's a disrespect to the character. Dude was a phucking badass and doesn't deserve to be called an idiot, especially a suicidally retarded one, just because he made mistakes fighting monstrous dragons.

Question:

If I gave you some critical advice, life-and-death type of advice and then I turned around and completely ignored that advice I just gave you. What would you think of my mentality in that situation?

Or let me put it this way:

Me: Hey Lestov, dragons are most vulnerable at twilight and at their most deadly at night.
You: Oh ya? Thanks for the info.
Me: Alright, I'm going to go hunt the biggest and most lethal dragon at night. Cya, bro.

What would you think, please be honest?

Originally posted by Robtard
Q

Me: Hey Lestov, dragons are most vulnerable at twilight and at their most deadly at night.
You: Oh ya? Thanks for the info.
Me: Alright, I'm going to go hunt the biggest and most lethal dragon at night. Cya, bro.

What would you think, please be honest?

i would think you were a total badass!

Originally posted by focus4chumps
"badass" is not a feat.

What does that have to do with anything?

Originally posted by focus4chumps
attacks alpha dragon at midnight, ignoring his own assertion of what a stupid move it was. thats called "stupid".

"stupid" is not an excuse to call somebody suicidal. Wipe Sadako's crusted semen off your eyes and pay attention to the circumstances.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
rather than attempt escape on the ladder, he committed suicide.

Yep, keep ignoring the circumstances and the blatantly-obvious-to-everybody-who-isn't-a-phucking-retard fact he had very little chance of survival and chose to to use the fact that he was likely going to die in the most advantageous way possible. He didn't commit suicide because the dragon was absolutely going to kill him, again blatantly obvious to everybody who isn't a phucking retard, no matter what Robtard's biased play-by-play picture says, because had Van Zan attempted to jump, the dragon would have eaten or fried his ass no question.. But you'll keep ignoring the circumstances and saying it was "idiotic suicide" because he didn't take the virtually non-existent chance of escape. Keep on jerking off Saddie. Don't forget to cradle the balls though.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
wow. a breakthrough. you admit some folly on his part. baby steps toward the truth, which proves you at least more capable of some level of reasoning. small wonder you and quan are drifting apart. 🙁

This has never been about Quan. It's about you making Van Zan, a badass mofo, out to be some kind of punk bytch. Of course, you're too busy shaving your head to get that Mr. Clean-bald, so when you blow Saddie later tonight he can imagine you're McClane, to notice how much of a butthurt dumbass you make yourself out to be with your 76-page blatant troll thread. It's okay though. Keep getting prepared for tonight when your mouth sees more suction than a Dirt Devil.

Originally posted by Robtard
Question:

If I gave you some critical advice, life-and-death type of advice and then I turned around and completely ignored that advice I just gave you. What would you think of my mentality in that situation?

Or let me put it this way:

Me: Hey Lestov, dragons are most vulnerable at twilight and at their most deadly at night.
You: Oh ya? Thanks for the info.
Me: Alright, I'm going to go hunt the biggest and most lethal dragon at night. Cya, bro.

What would you think, please be honest?

If you had the personality of Van Zan, I would think you were foolishly overeager, which makes sense, since Van Zan was obsessed with hunting dragons, considering they, you know, wiped out most of human civilization. Foolishly overeager, insanely overeager perhaps, but not suicidal. Just insanely obsessed, which Van Zan was. Again, foolish but not suicidal

Originally posted by focus4chumps
i would think you were a total badass!

The badassness comes from the monomaniacal, morally/ethically uninhibited obsession he had hunting his opponent. You don't have to be Sun Tzu to qualify as a badass.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
why not? up till that point he was responsible for other people and fancied himself a competent leader. what better time to kill himself when all his failure becomes painfully clear? that last fired arrow was all he had, and he failed at that too.

watch the jump slow motion. he doesnt even begin to swing the axe. in fact it seems he intended to elbow it for some stupid reason. no more stupid than hunting it at midnight however, but still...

except for the same ladder he used to climb up there?

look if you're trying to argue that he was completely stupid in place of suicidal, you might be on to something.

another form of rage-quit suicide?

no, i was mocking the "deny/use as-per-convienience" absolutist screen-feat assertion that quanchi started imposing on this forum long after the thread was even posted, so nice try.

in case you're new to 'quanchiisms', allow me to explain:

in the case of vader vs. obiwan, anakin screwed up due to his overconfidence. as per quan logic, thats a screen feat which proves unequivocally that every fight with vader will end up with him being cocky and losing. so vader vs kermit the frog: kermit wins. get it now?

riiiiiight. 😉

What was that you mentioned before about theoretical stuff.

He rears the Axe backwards as if to swing it the dragon was just faster then he could swing.

Because the ladder is a safe no dragons zone right.

And why are you applying this qaunism to me?

I honestly have no idea what encounter you are talking about.

But let's really talk about it there is an entire movie where he doesn't jump into things that will kill him. There is one instance where he did something stupid against another living breathing creature that had just attacked him.

Do honestly believe the man would jump into a wood chipper just because he jumped at a dragon trying to hurt it.

If you answer yes to that you're just being absurd that you believe that. I choose to believe you're actually intelligent and therefore this is obviously a troll thread plain and simple most likely used because of Qaun's like for the character you're trying to make him angry. Like I said stupid silly thread that adds no value.

Originally posted by Lestov16
If you had the personality of Van Zan, I would think you were foolishly overeager, which makes sense, since Van Zan was obsessed with hunting dragons, considering they, you know, wiped out most of human civilization. Foolishly overeager, insanely overeager perhaps, but not suicidal. Just insanely obsessed, which Van Zan was. Again, [b]foolish but not suicidal [/B]

quite a lengthy dodge

Originally posted by Robtard
Why would the iPad change a supposedly properly spelled word in a grammar correct sentence? (it wouldn't)

Do some more flips now, cos you're a child who's incapable of owning up to anything.

If you type something over and over sometimes it autocorrects the incorrect word. It just depends. But keep obsessing over spelling errors like a woman. Loving it.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
quite a lengthy dodge

Um, no bud. That's exactly what happened. Van Zan was blatantly insanely obsessed with hunting dragons, and got overeager at the opportunity to kill the alpha male. It's also the exact same reason he charged the alpha male rather waste his last moments on a non-existent escape chance. Again, obvious to anybody who isn't a phucking retard, but I guess that explains your inability to comprehend such simple logic. Perhaps Saddie's semen is killing your brain cells. Stop being his bottom bytch.

Originally posted by Newjak
What was that you mentioned before about theoretical stuff.

He rears the Axe backwards as if to swing it the dragon was just faster then he could swing.

Because the ladder is a safe no dragons zone right.

And why are you applying this qaunism to me?

I honestly have no idea what encounter you are talking about.

But let's really talk about it there is an entire movie where he doesn't jump into things that will kill him. There is one instance where he did something stupid against another living breathing creature that had just attacked him.

Do honestly believe the man would jump into a wood chipper just because he jumped at a dragon trying to hurt it.

If you answer yes to that you're just being absurd that you believe that. I choose to believe you're actually intelligent and therefore this is obviously a troll thread plain and simple most likely used because of Qaun's like for the character you're trying to make him angry. Like I said stupid silly thread that adds no value.

👆

Originally posted by Lestov16
Quan, you deserve virtually every bit of butthurt thrown at you. I'm just defending Van Zan here because it's a disrespect to the character. Dude was a phucking badass and doesn't deserve to be called an idiot, especially a suicidally retarded one, just because he made mistakes fighting monstrous dragons.
Look, I couldn't care less. I enjoy breaking people and its always the same result. People change and get their feelings hurt over fictional disagreements.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
quite a lengthy dodge
You are dodging new jacks post. Reminds me of when DDM leashed you.

Originally posted by Newjak
What was that you mentioned before about theoretical stuff.

right. only your observations are valid.

Originally posted by Newjak
He rears the Axe backwards as if to swing it the dragon was just faster then he could swing.

then why jump? why not stand there on the platform with a strong foothold and then only have to time the swing with the approaching dragon?

Originally posted by Newjak
Because the ladder is a safe no dragons zone right.

no, its an escape route. nice dodge 👆

Originally posted by Newjak
And why are you applying this qaunism to me?

you accused me of basing the thread on said quanchiism. nice dodge 👆

Originally posted by Newjak
honestly have no idea what encounter you are talking about.

you do. and you need to let it go. no use in holding grudges with internet strangers.

Originally posted by Newjak
But let's really talk about it there is an entire movie where he doesn't jump into things that will kill him. There is one instance where he did something stupid against another living breathing creature that had just attacked him.

there were many instances of him being stupid and recklessly irrational and suicidal. you chose to ignore them all. go on. tell me to repeat them all and waste more of my time with your subsequent dodges.

Originally posted by Newjak
Do honestly believe the man would jump into a wood chipper just because he jumped at a dragon trying to hurt it.

do you honestly believe that by incorrectly framing the situation you can somehow win this? speaking of quanchiisms

Originally posted by Newjak
If you answer yes to that you're just being absurd that you believe that. I choose to believe you're actually intelligent and therefore this is obviously a troll thread plain and simple most likely used because of Qaun's like for the character you're trying to make him angry. Like I said stupid silly thread that adds no value.

again, not my fault if quanchi is so emotionally invested in such a poorly written and suicidal character. basically by your reasoning, any bad light shined upon a character whom quanchi loves is "trolling".

sure you're totally just being objective here.