Denton Van Zan Vs. the Wood-chipper from Fargo

Started by quanchi112137 pages

Originally posted by Newjak
Qaun if you can't see the irony of what's he doing and how in some ways what he is doing is the same as yours it's down right funny.
It isn't the same thing. Here's why. I don't create threads against inanimate objects. I create threads against competent combatants. Focus is just a troll.

LOL Order 66 was 10 against 1. Khan is not going to simulate a 10-man attack, sorry.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Focus/Qaun is just a troll.
Yup like I said the irony of what you two are doing.

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL Order 66 was 10 against 1. Khan is not going to simulate a 10-man attack, sorry.
Not true. 2 took on Yoda and he lived. One shot Obi down. Different circumstances in all. Shows they can be tagged and rather easily.

Khan faced more than ten and lets not forget the airships.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It isn't the same thing. Here's why. I don't create threads against inanimate objects. I create threads against competent combatants. Focus is just a troll.

I support this. The absolutely despicable smear campaign Focus is putting Van Zan through violates several articles of the Geneva Convention.

Originally posted by Newjak
Yup like I said the irony of what you two are doing.
Keep repeating yourself in brick wall fashion.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not true. 2 took on Yoda and he lived. One shot Obi down. Different circumstances in all. Shows they can be tagged and rather easily.

Khan faced more than ten and lets not forget the airships.

How does that help you at all? They fired a cannon at Obi-Wan and he survived.

Almost everyother Jedi was either A) Surprised from behind while not fighting or B) surrounded on all sides.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Keep repeating yourself in brick wall fashion.
It is like I'm talking to brick walls with you two.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not true. 2 took on Yoda and he lived. One shot Obi down. Different circumstances in all. Shows they can be tagged and rather easily.

Khan faced more than ten and lets not forget the airships.

LOL that was not the same as 10+ clone troopers tag-teaming that blue chick and the guy with the Potato forehead.

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL that was not the same as 10+ clone troopers tag-teaming that blue chick and the guy with the Potato forehead.
The Blue chick didn't even have her lightsabers out and the potato headed guy was in the middle of a fight and was caught in between two armies at that point.

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL that was not the same as 10+ clone troopers tag-teaming that blue chick and the guy with the Potato forehead.
Not against Obi, Yoda, etc. all were different and Khan faced more than ten and mowed them down easily. It Wasnt even slightly difficult for him. He'd mow down clones all the same.

Originally posted by Newjak
The Blue chick didn't even have her lightsabers out and the potato headed guy was in the middle of a fight and was caught in between two armies at that point.
Was easily shit in his front. Was pathetic. Khan destroyed far more on their home world.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Was easily shit in his front. Was pathetic. Khan destroyed far more on their home world.
Anakin killed an entire village of sandpeople and fought off entire squadrons of droids over and over. You're not going to out feat either Obi-Wan or Anakin when it comes to group fighting.

The ridiculous thing is that Quan thinks that Khan can somehow single-handedly replicate the multiple-man squads required to put down a Force-User.

Originally posted by Newjak

Okay why did you make this thread?

to express how laughably bad the character was written.

your repeated assertion that its about quanchi will only serve to fuel the very malfunction of his that you seem to be trying to quell.

Originally posted by Lestov16
If you had the personality of Van Zan, I would think you were foolishly overeager, which makes sense, since Van Zan was obsessed with hunting dragons, considering they, you know, wiped out most of human civilization. Foolishly overeager, insanely overeager perhaps, but not suicidal. Just insanely obsessed, which Van Zan was. Again, [b]foolish but not suicidal
/B]

Come on, dude. Ignoring your own advice in a life and death situation cos you can't wait less than a day is nothing but rampant idiocy.

The character was written as a poor man's Captain Ahab and he came off as just an idiot.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
to express how laughably bad the character was written.

your repeated assertion that its about quanchi will only serve to fuel the very malfunction of his that you seem to be trying to quell.

And why do you care how laughably bad the character is written and do you honestly believe that he will jump into a woodchipper?

Originally posted by Newjak
And why do you care how laughably bad the character is written and do you honestly believe that he will jump into a woodchipper?
depends on the circumstances and if they led to the same rage-quit mentality.

Originally posted by Robtard
Come on, dude. Ignoring your own advice in a life and death situation cos you can't wait less than a day is nothing but rampant idiocy.

The character was written as a poor man's Captain Ahab and he came off as just an idiot.

I never said it wasn't rampant idiocy, but it isn't suicidal idiocy.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I never said it wasn't rampant idiocy, but it isn't suicidal idiocy.

IIRC, no one claimed going after the dragon at night with a crew was suicidal, just idiotic.

The suicidal aspect comes in when he chose to jump directly into the dragon's mouth in lieu of other higher chance of survival options.