Originally posted by quanchi112
Attacked with the axe. That was clearly his intent.None. Wiki and the film supports mine.
Wiki, Quan, Film>>you.
Cite a source to back you.
Film > you.
I have repeatedly used a source to back my thoughts, it's the film Reign of Fire. Van Zan never swung the axe, as you claimed.
Page flipped, you sneak: Anytime you want to "correct" me on Van Zan as you claimed, will be good 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardFilm, me, wiki>>you.Film > you.
I have repeatedly used a source to back my thoughts, it's the film Reign of Fire. Van Zan never swung the axe, as you claimed.
Page flipped, you sneak: Anytime you want to "correct" me on Van Zan as you claimed, will be good 🙂
You can't even back your wild claims.
1 source is all it took. 🙂
"get everyone killed BUT the dragon and rage quit"
the stupidity of the character and of his death rivals even this guy.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Film, me, wiki>>you.You can't even back your wild claims.
1 source is all it took. 🙂
You're well known for ignoring movie clips and just claiming something that didn't happen happened (classic troll move), as you are still with the "he swung the axe!" when there's no swing.
Film clip > you. You know this to be true; you won't admit it 🙂
Originally posted by focus4chumps🙂
Originally posted by RobtardClearly shows he swung the axe, verified by wiki, and by me.
You're well known for ignoring movie clips and just claiming something that didn't happen happened (classic troll move), as you are still with the "he swung the axe!" when there's no swing.Film clip > you. You know this to be true; you won't admit it 🙂
Wiki and film clip>>you.
Cry.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Clearly shows he swung the axe, verified by wiki, and by me.Wiki and film clip>>you.
Cry.
Yup, classic troll tactic, insist something happened when it didn't, despite visual proof being shown. You're lucky this forum is so lenient on obvious trolls.
Van Zan does what Van Zan does, he wins by raging and jumping to his death into the Wood-chipper as screen feats and character portrayal both tell us. Pick your flavor 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardIt did happen. We see it. I supported my viewpoints. You haven't.
Yup, classic troll tactic, insist something happened when it didn't, despite visual proof being shown. You're lucky this forum is so lenient on obvious trolls.Van Zan does what Van Zan does, he wins by raging and jumping to his death as screen feats and character portrayal both tell us. Pick your flavor 🙂
No, he tried killing the dragon. Wiki supports me. 💃
Originally posted by quanchi112
It did happen. We see it. I supported my viewpoints. You haven't.No, he tried killing the dragon. Wiki supports me. 💃
Film and film clip > you. There was no swing. Keep that classic troll going though, it's your only defense now that the clip has been posted in slow-mo and it's clear to see. You tried, but failed despite your obvious troll tactics. Maybe next time.
Doesn't matter either way, so he jumps into the Wood-chipper "trying" to kill it and and the end result is the same, Van Mulch 🙂
Originally posted by Robtard
Yup, classic troll tactic, insist something happened when it didn't, despite visual proof being shown. You're lucky this forum is so lenient on obvious trolls.Van Zan does what Van Zan does, he wins by raging and jumping to his death into the Wood-chipper as screen feats and character portrayal both tell us. Pick your flavor 🙂
It's interesting that quan is claiming that he supported his stance, when it was actually focus4chumps that posted the clip. Basically, he's claiming that focus4chumps is his alt.
His owning has obviously been so severe that he can't remember who he is.
Originally posted by RobtardIt clearly shows Hes jumping while swinging it. Keep denying it and pretending it matters. In any event even though your wrong his intention was to attack the dragon. You're clearly an idiot.
Film and film clip > you. There was no swing. Keep that classic troll going though, it's your only defense now that the clip has been posted in slow-mo and it's clear to see. You tried, but failed despite your obvious troll tactics. Maybe next time.Doesn't matter either way, so he jumps into the Wood-chipper "trying" to kill it and and the end result is the same, Van Mulch 🙂
Incorrect. Director would disagree as well, kiddo. Nothing supports you.
Originally posted by Silent MasterWiki, but focus switched sides and is bandwagoning me aka ridding my coattails.
It's interesting that quan is claiming that he supported his stance, when it was actually focus4chumps that posted the clip. Basically, he's claiming that focus4chumps is his alt.His owning has obviously been so severe that he can't remember who he is.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It clearly shows Hes jumping while swinging it. Keep denying it and pretending it matters. In any event even though your wrong his intention was to attack the dragon. You're clearly an idiot.Incorrect. Director would disagree as well, kiddo. Nothing supports you.
I refuse to believe you don't understand what "swinging an axe" entails. So yah, classic troll move of deny what's shown. Nothing new from you. What was the name of the troll from herochat you took this tactic from again?
Ad there's the personal attacks cos you've failed and try to divert that fact by hoping to turn this thread into a shit-slinging contest, sorry, not biting 🙂
Brilliant retort, dodge and rant. Back to your empty "the director" claims which you've yet to show. Film supports me, as shown in the clip. No swing, you were wrong.
Van Zan wins via turning into mulch, via screen feats and character portrayal.