Denton Van Zan Vs. the Wood-chipper from Fargo

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeating a lie is just repeating a lie. He never swung the axe. Typical strawman from you cos you can't debate the real point. He did a rage-quit, due to the failures from the first time we see him until the end. The man was simply an irrational rager; that's how he was written.

I believe I'm right cos the film supports my claims. But please proceed then, otherwise it's just more toothless Quanchi threats. Just source it, cos we all know you like to make stuff up.

No, your pain clouds your judgment. You are seething with anger. Zan wins.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's making threats that he might try to provide evidence, but he feels providing evidence to support a claim is "ridiculous" (his words).

Your favorite site.

Van Zan fires but the male destroys the arrow before it can hit. Knowing he missed, Van Zan jumps off the building to attack the male with his giant axe, but is caught in mid-air and eaten. Quinn and Alex lure the dragon to street level, where Quinn is able to fire his own explosive crossbow bolt into the dragon's mouth, killing it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he jumped while swinging the axe.

No, and you know he director wouldn't say so as you're a moron.

No, your pain clouds your judgment. You are seething with anger.

Zan wins.

Stop lying, he did not swing. He jumped holding the axe cocked back but did not swing.

In other words you have no idea what the director thinks.

More ad hominem attacks cos you can't logical refute my claims that are film supported as shown.

Via jumping to death feats, yes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying, he did not swing. He jumped holding the axe cocked back but did not swing.

In other words you have no idea what the director thinks.

More ad hominem attacks cos you can't logical refute my claims that are film supported as shown.

Via jumping to death feats, yes.

Lets hear the director Rob Bowmans take on the characters. You ready for your education to begin.

You losers started this ill end it.

In the words of Khan, Shall we begin ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your favorite site.

Van Zan fires but the male destroys the arrow before it can hit. Knowing he missed, Van Zan jumps off the building to attack the male with his giant axe, but is caught in mid-air and eaten. Quinn and Alex lure the dragon to street level, where Quinn is able to fire his own explosive crossbow bolt into the dragon's mouth, killing it.

Thank you for c/p from wikie and essentially repeating what I had to explain early in the thread to you and Lestov. I know exactly how the scene went down.

And that proves you're wrong, Van Zan's jump wasn't a sacrifice nor did it benefit Quinn in any way shape or form 🙂 Checkmate again.

Originally posted by Robtard
Thank you for c/p from wikie adn essentially repeating what I had to explain early in the thread to you and Lestov. I know exactly how the scene went down.

And that proves you're wrong, Van Zan's jump wasn't a sacrifice nor did it benefit Quinn in any way shape or form 🙂 Checkmate again.

Copying from wiki is all he can do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Fire_(film)

Originally posted by quanchi112
I posted another sites info word for word describing the scene. I'm right.

Lets hear the director Rob Bowmans take on the characters. You ready for your education to begin.

You losers started this ill end it.

In the words of Khan, [B]Shall we begin ? [/B]

Incorrect, it didn't support your "he swung the axe" claim, which is foundation of your argument. It just says he 'jumped to attack', great, he ended up not attacking with the axe, as seen. eg "He pulled his gun to shoot the thief" *decides not to pull the trigger in the end*

I said go on several post ago. I'm all ears.

More crybaby insults cos you can't support your stance with the film. Just "he's a badass!" rants.

he didnt want the poor dragon to get a splinter from barreling into the tower. <3

denton van zan: friend to all dragons <3

Originally posted by Robtard
Thank you for c/p from wikie and essentially repeating what I had to explain early in the thread to you and Lestov. I know exactly how the scene went down.

And that proves you're wrong, Van Zan's jump wasn't a sacrifice nor did it benefit Quinn in any way shape or form 🙂 Checkmate again.

Your viewpoints are so asinine it almost staggers belief. No one outside the sock focus and Saddie agree with you. That's it. Butthurt boys.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Copying from wiki is all he can do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Fire_(film)

Originally posted by focus4chumps
he didnt want the poor dragon to get a splinter from barreling into the tower. <3

denton van zan: friend to all dragons <3

Well, he did feed them.

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect, it didn't support your "he swung the axe" claim, which is foundation of your argument. It just says he 'jumped to attack', great, he ended up not attacking with the axe, as seen. eg "He pulled his gun to shoot the thief" *decides not to pull the trigger in the end*

I said go on several post ago. I'm all ears.

More crybaby insults cos you can't support your stance with the film. Just "he's a badass!" rants.

I just did. You can't find a single source online which says he rage quit. You're a troll. It's,cool.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
he didnt want the poor dragon to get a splinter from barreling into the tower. <3

denton van zan: friend to all dragons <3

Originally posted by quanchi112
You said he wasn't attacking with the axe. Clearly he was. You don't jump at something with an axe to hug it out.

Your viewpoints are so asinine it almost staggers belief. No one outside the sock focus and Saddie agree with you. That's it. Butthurt boys.

You clearly don't understand what attack means then. Holding an axe and not swinging it at your target isn't attacking. Do you considering just point a knife at someone "attacking them"?

So I guess those "I'll get the director!" threats were just empty? The film supports what I think and I've shown it. Cry more, Mr. Icantprovemycase.

Originally posted by Robtard
You clearly don't understand what attack means then. Holding an axe and not swinging it at your target isn't attacking. Do you considering just point a knife at someone "attacked them"?

So I guess those "I'll get the director!" threats were just empty? The film supports what I think and I've shown it. Cry more, Mr. Icantprovemycase.

He attacked the site supports me as any reasonable person watching the scene would say.

Nothing supports you. Wiki supports me for starters. 😂

Originally posted by focus4chumps

🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hes the dragons worst nightmare. That's a fact.

considering how hungry the dragon was, he was it's wet dream. 🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
nope. 🙂

considering how hungry the dragon was, he was it's wet dream. 🙂