Denton Van Zan Vs. the Wood-chipper from Fargo

Originally posted by quanchi112

LOL Totally.

Yes his had better be prepared. It looks quite hurty, judging by that slew of angry "Nahhh.. yous..!!!".

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
LOL Totally.

Yes his had better be prepared. It looks quite hurty, judging by that slew of angry "Nahhh.. yous..!!!".

Yeah... we are likely to get a lot more of his meltdowns. Kinda like this:

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
LOL Totally.

Yes his had better be prepared. It looks quite hurty, judging by that slew of angry "Nahhh.. yous..!!!".

Originally posted by Robtard
Lie all you like with your "he swung the axe" claim, cos whatever you lie, won't change the film 🙂

But you dodged, how does Van Zan win?

quanchi logic: axe moved 3 inches = he swung axe 🙄

Originally posted by focus4chumps
quanchi logic: axe moved 3 inches = he swung axe 🙄

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wiki agrees. His intent is clearly to use the axe to attack.

{citation needed}

ridiculous failclown.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
{citation needed}

ridiculous failclown.

the point it wikipedia itself needs citation.

i understand that idiots like you consider it a be-all source but its not.

your insistence that it is proves to everyone what a silly clown you are.

please continue 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Are you the leader of this posse or is it Roberto ?

This is no leader of the "posse": its an internet message board united in passing on their dismay at the continued prescence of a predictable, lazy unoriginal trollposts put there by fools such as yourself.

You however totally are the mere roadie/tampon garbage pail collector of the 'Lipstick posse' though.
You have to wait til the others are through applying their rouge gloss before you are allowed to use it.

This is made more obvious by your lack of argument in this thread despite all the butthurt posts you put in it.

Explain in detail why VanZan would win, without using wiki non-arguments, please.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your interpretation is incorrect. Mine is supported by wiki. Yours isn't. Nothing you said is supported.

You don't understand that if wiki doesn't support what is shown on film, you don't use it as the end-all source 🙂 There was no swing of the axe 🙂

And you dodged again 🙂 Very telling 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
You don't understand that if wiki doesn't support what is shown on film, you don't use it as the end-all source 🙂

And you dodged again 🙂 Very telling.

quan seems to believe that wiki >>>> the movie itself.

adolescent boys trying to impress others tend to stoke their own egos at the expense of their grounding in reality.

😍

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth

Explain in detail why VanZan would win, without using wiki non-arguments, please.

Van Zan wins because, despite all the retarded mistakes he made, he clearly isn't suicidal, and clearly isn't stupid enough to not know how to press and off switch. You saying "He jumped into the dragon's mouth, which means he'll jump into anything" and completely ignoring the context of the scene and film in general doesn't make you right, sorry.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Van Zan wins because, despite all the retarded mistakes he made, he clearly isn't suicidal, and clearly isn't stupid enough to not know how to press and off switch. You saying "He jumped into the dragon's mouth, which means he'll jump into anything" and completely ignoring the context of the scene and film in general doesn't make you right, sorry.

Show Zan using a wood-chipper's off switch.

Originally posted by Lestov16
blah blah context

that he had an escape route and was on a structure that might at least SCRATCH the dragon?

or

that he was carrying an axe which he knew would not even tickle it's nose?

or

that it was nothing more than rage quit suicide

Originally posted by Silent Master
Show Zan using a wood-chipper's off switch.

omg this 😂

according to quanchi's law, woodchipper wins.

/thread