Imhotep (Mummy) vs. Midna (Fused Shadows) TP

Started by ScreamPaste22 pages

There is no speculation here: The minimum of what happened there is more than Emotep can do. He cannot do shit here.

Not by Emotep, he's too weak.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
There is no speculation here: The minimum of what happened there is more than Emotep can do. He cannot do shit here.

Not by Emotep, he's too weak.

False. Speculation. Prove it.

The castle exploded. Proven. haermm

You're cute when you're in denial mode.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The castle exploded. Proven. haermm

You're cute when you're in denial mode.

Speculation as to what caused explosion.

You are dumb when yo uare in make up stuff mode and pretend its fact.

Irrelevant, it exploded. Emotep cannot replicate this.

Man, learn to English, that's the most awkward sentence I've read today. Emotep is too weak to compete with Midna. If she didn't have the Fused Shadows it'd potentially be a fight but she does. She crushes him.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Irrelevant, it exploded. Emotep cannot replicate this.

Man, learn to English, that's the most awkward sentence I've read today. Emotep is too weak to compete with Midna. If she didn't have the Fused Shadows it'd potentially be a fight but she does. She crushes him.

Speculation as to what caused it.

No, he isn't. She went down easily against Dorf.

Takes mask off which is canon is irrefutable.

Who caused it is irrelevant, though we know it was Midna. Emotep can't recreate it and Midna survived it.

Dorf could crush Emotep like an ant.

Took more power than Emotep has. Emotep loses.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Who caused it is irrelevant, though we know it was Midna. Emotep can't recreate it and Midna survived it.

Dorf could crush Emotep like an ant.

Took more power than Emotep has. Emotep loses.

Context is never irrelevant.

Prove it.

Mask comes off. Canon. Imhotep wins, easily.

This isn't context its' semantics. If Midna blew up the castle, she survived a castle buster. If Ganon blew up the castle she survived a caslte buster centered on herself. Arguing that it was not her is actually hurting your own argument in this thread. Emotep cannot bust castles, he cannot take the Fused Shadows.

Emotep is helpless against Midna.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
This isn't context its' semantics. If Midna blew up the castle, she survived a castle buster. If Ganon blew up the castle she survived a caslte buster centered on herself. Arguing that it was not her is actually hurting your own argument in this thread. Emotep cannot bust castles, he cannot take the Fused Shadows.

Emotep is helpless against Midna.

We do not know how she survived but we do know she was defeated and her mask comes off.

Doesn't need to and that method defeated her but it isn't proof that is the only way.

Removes mask which is canon and wins.

Irrelevant because Emotep cannot reproduce the circumstances.

It's proof doing so is outside the spectrum of Emotep's power.

You have not provided a single feat which allows Emotep to disarm her of the Fused Shadows.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Irrelevant because Emotep cannot reproduce the circumstances.

It's proof doing so is outside the spectrum of Emotep's power.

You have not provided a single feat which allows Emotep to disarm her of the Fused Shadows.

No limits fallacy on top of speculation. We know for a fact the mask can come off.

Sand.

Game over.

It is not a no limits fallacy, she is beyond him by feats.

The sand is pathetic, nowhere near what it took to defeat her.

Game over = You surrender?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It is not a no limits fallacy, she is beyond him by feats.

The sand is pathetic, nowhere near what it took to defeat her.

Game over = You surrender?

No, she isn't. You claim she is without proving it.

Baseless claim. Mask comes off. Canon.

Game over means you lose.

It was proven the second she blew up a castle with a melee attack.

Superman KOing someone doesn't mean Batman can KO someone. Midna was defeated by Ganondorf, that's irrelevant to Emotep.

Lose what? Patience with your fan fiction?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It was proven the second she blew up a castle with a melee attack.

Superman KOing someone doesn't mean Batman can KO someone. Midna was defeated by Ganondorf, that's irrelevant to Emotep.

Lose what? Patience with your fan fiction?

Speculation as we don't know what made it blow up.

Imhoteps implied power and feats are on the same level and higher since he was a threat to the entire planet .

Came off is all we know. Can come off. Canon.

My shoe can come off. A goldfish cannot remove my shoe.

Her mask came off either from the explosion or Dorf. Sand that can only strip human flesh cannot remove the mask.

Deny all you want, because so far your only counter that brings this feat down a peg is saying the castle rocks knocked it off.. which means post-explosion. Only counter is that it cam off before the explosion she caused.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Speculation as we don't know what made it blow up.

Imhoteps implied power and feats are on the same level and higher since he was a threat to the entire planet .

Came off is all we know. Can come off. Canon.

It's not speculation, we know exactly who did it, and we know where Midna was when it happened. Emotep cannot replicate the feat. Emotep cannot disarm her.

Ohlawd you want to talk about implied power in a debate against Zelda. haermm Do you have any idea what sort of monstrosities characters like Link and Ganon turn into with 'implied power'? haermm

That is not all we know, haermm We know that the bare minimum it took was her own castle busting attack. I doubt that's what did it but that doesn't matter because Emotep can't replicate it.

Originally posted by BloodRain
My shoe can come off. A goldfish cannot remove my shoe.

Her mask came off either from the explosion or Dorf. Sand that can only strip human flesh cannot remove the mask.

Deny all you want, because so far your only counter that brings this feat down a peg is saying the castle rocks knocked it off.. which means post-explosion. Only counter is that it cam off before the explosion she caused.

Originally posted by BloodRain
My shoe can come off. A goldfish cannot remove my shoe.

Her mask came off either from the explosion or Dorf. Sand that can only strip human flesh cannot remove the mask.

Deny all you want, because so far your only counter that brings this feat down a peg is saying the castle rocks knocked it off.. which means post-explosion. Only counter is that it cam off before the explosion she caused.

Imhotep isn't a goldfish and has tk himself. Horrible analogy.
Speculation.

We don't know if it came off before the castle fell. We simply don't know. Speculation isn't a strong case.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It's not speculation, we know exactly who did it, and we know where Midna was when it happened. Emotep cannot replicate the feat. Emotep cannot disarm her.

Ohlawd you want to talk about implied power in a debate against Zelda. haermm Do you have any idea what sort of monstrosities characters like Link and Ganon turn into with 'implied power'? haermm

That is not all we know, haermm We know that the bare minimum it took was her own castle busting attack. I doubt that's what did it but that doesn't matter because Emotep can't replicate it.

Prove he can but you can't even prove what knocked it off only that it comes off.

Nothing compared to Imhotep. Dorf is a guy easily beaten by a mirror.

Speculation.