Imhotep (Mummy) vs. Midna (Fused Shadows) TP

Started by ScreamPaste22 pages
ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Castle buster > sand.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Castle buster > sand.
Prove it.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

The sand has no destructive feats approaching a castle bust.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The sand has no destructive feats approaching a castle bust.
You are incorrectly assuming anything less than a castle bust can't beat her.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

I'm correctly stating that something less than 1/100th the force cannot harm her.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'm correctly stating that something less than 1/100th the force cannot harm her.
Prove it.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Castle Buster > Emotep.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Castle Buster > Emotep.
Prove it.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Emotep has no comparable feats, therefore he is not comparable.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Emotep has no comparable feats, therefore he is not comparable.
Prove it.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Emotep's best feat is pathetic by comparison. Prove he can compete or concede.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Emotep's best feat is pathetic by comparison. Prove he can compete or concede.
Burden is on you.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Your claim your burden. I don't have to prove a negative.

Emotep's best feat is less than 1/1000th of a castle bust.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Your claim your burden. I don't have to prove a negative.

Emotep's best feat is less than 1/1000th of a castle bust.

You claimed it.

Burden is on you.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

You claim he can harm Midna despite her immense durability, that is your burden to support. None of his feats approach 1/1000th the durability she displayed.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You claim he can harm Midna despite her immense durability, that is your burden to support. None of his feats approach 1/1000th the durability she displayed.
Speculation and prove it.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

No, I do not have to prove my proof to my proof. You have to counter, form an argument, and support it, or you are simply being a contrarion for the sake of it.

Provide an argument and support it next post. Or concede, you know, like you've been doing for pages. haermm

BloodRain Knight of Retribution

There..
Quan: AK kills Dorf because he's shown no resistance.
Scream: Dorf has greater magic.
Quan: That isnt resistance, he dies.

Here..
Scream: Zant curses her because she's shown no resistance.
Quan: She has greater magic, wont effect her.

Lol?

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it isn't comparable.
It depends on the magic. Voldemort can oneshot him whereas Midna can't.

BR: "How strong is the sand?"
Quan: "Strong enough to skin a human."
BR: "So human skin, thats its limit?"
Quan: "That's what it easily skinned and based off Midna having skin and being able to he harmed that is what we call proof. "

By your admittance the sand can only damage human skin. Prove human-level damage will work.

Where is the incomplete evidence that cannot be covered at all?

No resistance = no chance, as you've debated before.