Originally posted by quanchi112
I can simply post on it I am not required to post basic videos and educate you on the fairly obvious. We simply don't know enough about what transpired to set off the explosion. We can simply speculate but that isn't factual no matter how badly you want it to be.
She needs to use it in the same manner as the tactic you're debating for. He's been distracted while using an outside sandstorm but never when he was the sand itself. How can someone kiss him while he's the sand itself ?
His body was fine. Se killed him but didn't destroy his body.
The only thing to deny the feat is to assume external factors to discredit it. The facts and basics without assumptions gives the feat. What we do know is that Midna was only knocked out, not killed or suffering physical injuries. It can be argued that the explosion did her in or she survived it for Dorf to do it to her, no matter what we know that she was in that explosion.
Not being killed by or suffering injuries from a that castle explosion > sand that strips human flesh.
Would you say a person that hasn't fired a gun is incapable of doing so? We know both can be used in the suggested way, and we know both of them have the means to do so. To say they can't is.. yeah, reach.
Not the exact same way O__o He can be fazed by attacks, and loses control if he loses focus so attacking him (in a more powerful way than bullets) can make him lose control. And Midna has proven that her abilities have the ability to touch intangible beings, so his sand form will be within her grasp.
"Yeah he came back somehow but she still made him implode." In that point in time he no longer had a body.
Originally posted by BloodRainMy IPad doesn't work on YouTube that well. I already told you this. Rent the movie or something.
Too difficult to post or explain a feat for the sake of debate, even if it takes 5 mins and would rapidly speed up the arguments? Fair enough.The only thing to deny the feat is to assume external factors to discredit it. The facts and basics without assumptions gives the feat. What we do know is that Midna was only knocked out, not killed or suffering physical injuries. It can be argued that the explosion did her in or she survived it for Dorf to do it to her, no matter what we know that she was in that explosion.
Not being killed by or suffering injuries from a that castle explosion > sand that strips human flesh.Would you say a person that hasn't fired a gun is incapable of doing so? We know both can be used in the suggested way, and we know both of them have the means to do so. To say they can't is.. yeah, reach.
Not the exact same way O__o He can be fazed by attacks, and loses control if he loses focus so attacking him (in a more powerful way than bullets) can make him lose control. And Midna has proven that her abilities have the ability to touch intangible beings, so his sand form will be within her grasp.
"Yeah he came back somehow but she still made him implode." In that point in time he no longer had a body.
Ko'd is a loss so that's all that is needed. Sand can take mask off as well since she's lost it in battle.
No, but that's entirely different. Speculation.
Only when he isn't the sand and is trying to concentrate on an outside environment. Prove she can hurt him while in sand mode.
She attacked his body unlike her attacking sand here.
I don't want to
Originally posted by quanchi112
My IPad doesn't work on YouTube that well. I already told you this. Rent the movie or something.
Ko'd is a loss so that's all that is needed. Sand can take mask off as well since she's lost it in battle.
No, but that's entirely different. Speculation.
Only when he isn't the sand and is trying to concentrate on an outside environment. Prove she can hurt him while in sand mode.
She attacked his body unlike her attacking sand here.
In the sense that she lost after a castle exploded, yes. Can you prove that the sand you say only strips human flesh can be compared to that? And what, prove it has the strength/force to remove it.
Exactly, no. We know they have a gun and we know how the same gun is being used. To go further, its like saying that guy can shoot at a gun range but is physically incapable of shooting a body if push comes to shove. Midna has the ability. Midna has been shown using the ability. Others with the same ability use it in combat. 2+2=Midna going intangible.
Actually as we have proof that distraction loses his control, and nothing to suggest this differs from what he's controlling.. good tactic still stands. And if you do prove it somehow, it still means that Imhotep wont be using his stronger attacks. Easy: Sand is a semi-intangible form. Twilight particles, Poes and Death Sword are a semi-intangible forms. Midna can affect all of them.
Confirmation that if she hit his body (assuming that being sand saves him) the she will make him implode?
Provide a feat, or concede by default. Midna can attack intangibles as proven by BloodRain. Emotep is not even the sand as proven by myself. Emotep cannot harm someone capable of surviving a castle busting explosion.
All evidence points to Midna winning, you post evidence or you concede. Those are the terms.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteyou have to agree by the terms or else you are my bytch.
Provide a feat, or concede by default. Midna can attack intangibles as proven by BloodRain. Emotep is not even the sand as proven by myself. Emotep cannot harm someone capable of surviving a castle busting explosion.All evidence points to Midna winning, you post evidence or you concede. Those are the terms.
Midna can lose her mask as proven by the game. Sand takes mask and then her life.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteak kills. If you feel otherwise prove it.
I don't have to do shit, lol. You refuse to support your position, you lose, it's that simple.I did indeed see the movie.
Ganondorf took her mask, Ganondorf is massively more powerful than Emotep. The sand is not powerful enough to harm her.
We don't know what made it fall off. Sand rips it off. She dies. Easy.