Stand with Rand!!!!

Started by Supra3 pages

Stand with Rand!!!!

Stand with Ran. People wake up our freedoms are being taking away and the government wants to use drones to kill us at will. Turn on Cspan 2.

This goes against everything out constitution stands for, stand with Rand Paul. We must stop this.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2013/03/05/us-drone-strike_n_2813857.html

http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN2/

You don't trust Homeland Security to make an accurate jugdement, that's fine.

But the moment I get mixed up with a murderer hiding in a cavern out in the middle of HickVille USA with not a sole within a hundred miles of me, which would have to be the circumanstance...it will be a cold day in hell.

I actually feel safer knowing those Drones are out there.

Obama approves drone strikes on US civilians on our homeland but water boarding terrorists is unconstitutional.

Originally posted by Dolos
You don't trust Homeland Security to make an accurate jugdement, that's fine.

But the moment I get mixed up with a murderer hiding in a cavern out in the middle of HickVille USA with not a sole within a hundred miles of me, which would have to be the circumanstance...it will be a cold day in hell.

I actually feel safer knowing those Drones are out there.

You don't have your facts right. DOS does not control the drones, it's the CIA! Turn Cspan on and wake up.

I wish more than anything Mitt Romey had won this election. Obama had thes plans all along.

Originally posted by Supra
I wish more than anything Mitt Romey had won this election. Obama had thes plans all along.

Yes, the US Military's invention and use of drones for counterterrorism through HOMELAND SECURITY was the result of Obama's machinations all along. And MITT ROMNEY WOULD NEVER STAND FOR THAT. shocking

herp derp etc @ op

Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Supra
Stand with Ran. People wake up our freedoms are being taking away and the government wants to use drones to kill us at will. Turn on Cspan 2.

This goes against everything out constitution stands for, stand with Rand Paul. We must stop this.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2013/03/05/us-drone-strike_n_2813857.html

http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN2/

Why are you flipping out over the drone issue. Why aren't you flipping out that the President in certain extreme conditions of national emergency could order military force against US citizens, period? Why is "drone" the naughty word here?

Re: Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Why are you flipping out over the drone issue. Why aren't you flipping out that the President in certain extreme conditions of national emergency could order military force against US citizens, period? Why is "drone" the naughty word here?

Did you just use the D-word!? Kank! That will be 100 hail marries, but Jesus will accept 50 because you used one in quotation form.

Anyway the D-word was the result of Obama's Master Plan. Duh!

Rand Paul, you mean the individual who compared public health care to slavery?

If that is what your constitution says, there is no reason to stand with it.

The drones arent the problem. The pilots and their commanders are, especially if we're going to fund a government and politicians to operate this without due process.

Rand sucks but at least he isnt as bad at these other shit politicians. It was a nice filibuster that should continuously be discussed and finally solved.

I want a drone.

Originally posted by Oliver North
Rand Paul, you mean the individual who compared public health care to slavery?

If that is what your constitution says, there is no reason to stand with it.

*Free healthcare. Nice disguise of wording 😉

I'd go as far as saying taxes is a form of slavery. Free-ranged, not freedom.

Re: Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Why are you flipping out over the drone issue. Why aren't you flipping out that the President in certain extreme conditions of national emergency could order military force against US citizens, period? Why is "drone" the naughty word here?

Flippping out?

Re: Re: Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Supra
Flippping out?

Sure, ignore the core of my question.

How about this, replace "flipping out" with "worrying over" and reread my post. Better now?

Originally posted by Supra
I wish more than anything Mitt Romey had won this election. Obama had thes plans all along.

You're a fool if you dont think that the majority of both parties favors this. This was the dumbest thing I've read in this thread so far.

Re: Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Why are you flipping out over the drone issue. Why aren't you flipping out that the President in certain extreme conditions of national emergency could order military force against US citizens, period? Why is "drone" the naughty word here?

He is flipping out about the latter, thats obvious.

Drones seem to be this administrations mascot and their preferable method.

edit: i did find this part funny though...

"...in certain extreme conditions of national emergency..."

Is that why they killed a 16 year old american? haermm

Originally posted by Dolos
Yes, the US Military's invention and use of drones for counterterrorism through HOMELAND SECURITY was the result of Obama's machinations all along. And MITT ROMNEY WOULD NEVER STAND FOR THAT. shocking

Truth

Originally posted by Mairuzu
*Free healthcare. Nice disguise of wording 😉

I don't think I'm disguising anything, especially considering I don't consider public health free, and Paul's point was about government run health care.

Originally posted by Mairuzu
I'd go as far as saying taxes is a form of slavery. Free-ranged, not freedom.

then you are an idiot whose opinion on the matter is beyond irrelevant.

Re: Re: Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Mairuzu
He is flipping out about the latter, thats obvious.

Drones seem to be this administrations mascot and their preferable method.

edit: i did find this part funny though...

"...in certain extreme conditions of national emergency..."

Is that why they killed a 16 year old american? haermm

Yet "drone" is the catch word used.

IIRC and if it can be believed, yes, the President would need those conditions to use this power.

I find it funny how you consistently try to pass that incident off as if Obama specifically targeted that teen.

Originally posted by Oliver North
I don't think I'm disguising anything, especially considering I don't consider public health free, and Paul's point was about government run health care.

then you are an idiot whose opinion on the matter is beyond irrelevant.

I'm an idiot for thinking coercion and theft is wrong?

Lol you've been indoctrinated very well, slave.