Stand with Rand!!!!

Started by Mairuzu3 pages

Re: Re: Re: Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Yet "drone" is the catch word used.

IIRC and if it can be believed, yes, the President would need those conditions to use this power.

I find it funny how you consistently try to pass that incident off as if Obama specifically targeted that teen.

These operations are under his control and his administration. Presidents are the face of all blame, does he deserve sole blame? No. But this is under this watch and nothing was said about it and still till this day they arent providing any information as to why.

I find it odd that you would let it go.

Oh man, Ran was so good. Fantastic film.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stand with Rand!!!!

Originally posted by Mairuzu
These operations are under his control and his administration. Presidents are the face of all blame, does he deserve sole blame? No. But this is under this watch and nothing was said about it and still till this day they arent providing any information as to why.

I find it odd that you would let it go.

What am I letting go?

His resonsibility for that action and these types of actions under his watch. Otherwise what is a president for?

Originally posted by Mairuzu
His resonsibility for that action and these types of actions under his watch. Otherwise what is a president for?

No, I think an innocent dying even as collateral damage is crappy, not something I'm proud that my country did.

But trying to pass it off as "Obama targeted an innocent teen!" is clown tactics.

There hasnt been any information released by this administration to assume that he didn't target him personally, as well as there not being enough to say he did as well... that specific target (anwars son) hasnt had jack shit worth of info released on it, but the fact of the matter is that these operations are ran under his approval and watch.

We already know Obama authorizes these drone strikes in the ones we do get information on. He just so happens to not do the one that would give him the worst rep?

Originally posted by Mairuzu
I'm an idiot for thinking coercion and theft is wrong?

no, you are an idiot for thinking taxation is a form of slavery

How is coercively collecting wealth from people not a form of slavery?

Like I said, its free-ranged. Not freedom.

You can stick to your ad hominems but you're not even bothering to justify it.

The prison industry in the US is a sort of slavery...

Originally posted by Mairuzu
you're not even bothering to justify it.

astute

When you start imprisoning people for victimless crimes, yeah. Then you have the other slaves finance those slaves.

Originally posted by Oliver North
astute

Is this your way of avoiding my question?

Originally posted by Mairuzu
There hasnt been any information released by this administration to assume that he didn't target him personally, as well as there not being enough to say he did as well... that specific target (anwars son) hasnt had jack shit worth of info released on it, but the fact of the matter is that these operations are ran under his approval and watch.

We already know Obama authorizes these drone strikes in the ones we do get information on. He just so happens to not do the one that would give him the worst rep?

IIRC, his father and another man were the targets. Teen happened to be there too.

Pretty sure Obama spoke about the target (the father) publicly.

It's a crappy situation, but again, your angle of "Obama tagerted an innocent teen" is little more than smear.

Originally posted by Robtard
IIRC, his father and another man were the targets. Teen happened to be there too.

Pretty sure Obama spoke about the target (the father) publicly.

It's a crappy situation, but again, your angle of "Obama tagerted an innocent teen" is little more than smear.

You recall incorrectly. The boy was killed a week after his father in a separate attack.

Obama did publically announce the assassination of Anwar.

Obama and his administration. They're all to blame. An american kid is dead by their hands.

I do wish Rand Paul wasn't such a tool, the drone strike issue is actually quite important. It's good that he draws attention to it, I guess.

Originally posted by Mairuzu
Is this your way of avoiding my question?

no, its my way of expressing that your position really doesn't merit a reply.

so ya, I'm indoctrinated or whatever you think, I'm also done dealing with someone who thinks the social contract is equivalent to slavery.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I do wish Rand Paul wasn't such a tool, the drone strike issue is actually quite important. It's good that he draws attention to it, I guess.

I agree. The apple fell slightly further away from the tree. Ron had some douchery moments as well but not as much as Rand.

Still better than most politicians Id say.

Originally posted by Oliver North
no, its my way of expressing that your position really doesn't merit a reply.

so ya, I'm indoctrinated or whatever you think, I'm also done dealing with someone who thinks the social contract is equivalent to slavery.

How many more words will it take to not answer that question you accuse me of being an idiot over? Lol. Shows your integrity.

Show me where i signed this "social contract". You're even trained to use the abstract wording lol.

Originally posted by Mairuzu
You recall incorrectly. The boy was killed a week after his father in a separate attack.

Obama did publically announce the assassination of Anwar.

Obama and his administration. They're all to blame. An american kid is dead by their hands.

Fair enough.

Yes. I jut said that.

The details? Cos you were trying to pass it off as if the kid was a specific target.

They killed him along with his cousin during a BBQ supposedly.

Again, not enough information is being shared by the administration. I would probably hide that shit too. I believe their reasoning was that he was military aged. Not at 16.

So you don't know the details, but are running with the worst possible scenario?

Oh my God Obama is a human being AND a deomcrat? A boy is dead? I can accept getting millions of families ruined for Republican oil pursuits in the middle east because, well, because they're Republican. Democrats have to be perfect, it's not enough that he is pulling us out a quickening rate and that our stocks are improving and our debt is decreasing, no sir. Republicans would have run us into the ground by now, but it's okay, they're Republicans, they don't have to be perfect I'll accept them being even a little dirty. I like it rough, I'm amerrkn.

imma ameerk. American=evil. It would be unpatriotic not to speak out on how we've degrated so. Slandering democratic leaders for anything and everything, there isn't much dirt, and it's amusing how just that, which would easily be covered up the Republicans, can take full advantage of the unaware, uneducated, innocent and naive majority...because, even now, Republicans still own the most powerful branch of Government, therefore manipulation of political facts are oh so easy for them, they would laugh at ten consecutive democratic wins.

This is why I love the Daily Show, John Stewart is a comedian that I can laugh with, because he is what I consider a down to earth, logical, reasonable human being. Unlike Rand Paul.