John McClane vs Bone (Blood and Bone)

Pure H2H fight. No weapons whatsoever.
Bloodlusted to the death
Who takes it?

Bone destroys McClane. McClane either gets one-shotted by Bone, or if we go by Sadako's rules that McClane is somehow impervious to knockouts, then Bone breaks his arms and legs.

Lol.

His arms and legs are impervious to breakage.

Butthurt thread number 16, Lestov... well done.

Bone is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too skilled.

McClane takes all that Bone can dish out, than one shots his ass..

bye for now.. school is calling

Lol. This thread is spite against McClane.

Nope. We have people saying Bone will win, and people saying McClane will win. This thread is a debate.

But the people saying Bone will win have legitimate reasons.

Bone effortlessly beat the number 1 fighter in the world.

He easily broke bones.

His martial arts skill is so high, McClane can't even see it.

In a h2h brawl, McClane gets schooled and anyone who says different is trolling.

Watch Bone fight, and watch a few scenes with mcClane fighting, and tell me I'm wrong.

Originally posted by KingD19

In a h2h brawl, McClane gets schooled and anyone who says different is trolling.

So Bruce Skywalker is trolling here?:

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
McClane takes all that Bone can dish out, than one shots his ass..

Originally posted by Lestov16
Pure H2H fight. No weapons whatsoever.
Bloodlusted to the death
Who takes it?

One thing is for sure, this is a much closer fight than Bone vs Van Zan.

1) You're wrong, since Zan clearly outclasses McClane in H2H
2) How is that relevant to thread, besides you satisfying your insatiable appetite for butthurt trolling?

Originally posted by Lestov16
So Bruce Skywalker is trolling here?:

Trolling, joking, whatever he's doing it's not the truth.

Put up a video of Bone fighting, and then try to find a video of McClane fighting h2h. Not only does Bone outweigh McClane by at least 100lbs and some change, he's actually a skilled fighter and has much more strength.

There is no way McClane would even walk away from a serious fight with Bone. He'd be ko'd, have something broken, etc...

Originally posted by Lestov16
1) You're wrong, since Zan clearly outclasses McClane in H2H
2) How is that relevant to thread, besides you satisfying your insatiable appetite for butthurt trolling?

You're mad that McClane beats Van 10/10, so you posted this spite thread....so my comment is in fact relevant to thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
One thing is for sure, this is a much closer fight than Bone vs Van Zan.

I disagree. Whatever their difference in skill may be, at least Van Zan and McClane belong roughly to the same bracket of skilled street sluggers. You can include other good fighters like Rambo and even James Bond in there.

On a completely different level, you have the extremely skilled martial artists. Guys like Bone, Boyka, Frank Martin, IP Man, Kham, the Bride... guys from the 1st group have no business getting into pure h2h fights with this 2nd group.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I disagree. Whatever their difference in skill may be, at least Van Zan and McClane belong roughly to the same bracket of skilled street sluggers. You can include other good fighters like Rambo and even James Bond in there.

On a completely different level, you have the extremely skilled martial artists. Guys like Bone, Boyka, Frank Martin, IP Man, Kham, the Bride... guys from the 1st group have no business getting into pure h2h fights with this 2nd group.

The fight being closer doesn't mean McClance has a chance of winning, just that if Van lasts 5 seconds, McClane would last 10.

FFS, this is silly. Bone breaks his bone off in Mac's butt.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
FFS, this is silly. Bone breaks his bone off in Mac's butt.

It's more sad than silly, The OP is just upset that he and quan are the only ones impressed enough by Van's abs to give him wins that he hasn't earned.

Silly bait thread.

What the hell is Blood and bone?

never even heard of it.