The next to die....

Started by ColossusGrundy2 pages

The next to die....

We've seen it several time before:

Hal Jordan, Superman, Barry Allen, Captain America, Colossus, Batman.... etc.

A beloved (or not) character "dies" and is later brought back, either better than before or having a lot of new hang-ups for plot devices.

Who in comics RIGHT NOW, needs to DIE in order to salvage the character?

Seriously, who is so predictable, boring, and in need of a "RESET" so much that the only way of making them any more interesting is to kill them?

Use your hatred, use your boredom, be vicious.

If you want, tell the way in which the character dies (be creative).

(and yes, other than deities and spirits, your favorite CAN die)

Norman Osborne, Thanos should have stayed dead, Sentry should come back and be impaled on a jazzy easy chair. Alot of characters just dont need to be around. Moonstone etc.

Thor, he doesn't die enough....

That's a joke (although I suspect he may in the Godkiller stufff) I'm actually really enjoying the Godkiller stuff.

Cyclops. He needs redemption, and fast.

Barry Allen so we can get Wally back.

cyclops definately, id like to see hulk off-world for awhile...i deeply enjoyed planet hulk. Thor need to raise his status and remain aloof from midgard. He need to ditch the avengers completely for the sake of the character.

Zatanna, Colossus, and don't forget Grundy

Superman needs to get raped by Zod and then die slowly from Kryptonian AIDS.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Cyclops. He needs redemption, and fast.

Barry Allen so we can get Wally back.


Really? Cyclops has always Seemed to be one of the more boring x-men as was. I like the idea of him being the new magneto like figure. It opens up possibilities not present for him to venture before his 'fall'.

magneto

Originally posted by SevenShackles
Really? Cyclops has always Seemed to be one of the more boring x-men as was. I like the idea of him being the new magneto like figure. It opens up possibilities not present for him to venture before his 'fall'.

No. No, no, no, no, no.

I need to start rocking Cyclops sigs again, methinks...

Originally posted by -Pr-
No. No, no, no, no, no.

I need to start rocking Cyclops sigs again, methinks...

Is there a pic of X-Clops doing the X symbol with his arms?

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Is there a pic of X-Clops doing the X symbol with his arms?

Yes, but i'd never use it. it's too 90s.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Yes, but i'd never use it. it's too 90s.
Where he also has the X-face mask?

That's too awful to not make a sig out of IMO

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Where he also has the X-face mask?

That's too awful to not make a sig out of IMO

😂

I don't know of one with the mask, but I can check... Assuming I can sit through the newer comics.

Originally posted by SevenShackles
Really? Cyclops has always Seemed to be one of the more boring x-men as was. I like the idea of him being the new magneto like figure. It opens up possibilities not present for him to venture before his 'fall'.
👆 'cept he shouldn't fall

Smh...

embrace change, raoul. embrace change.

When it's bad, no thanks.

I challenge anyone to read Morrison or Whedon's run on X-Men and then tell me that Cyclops is boring.

He was NEVER supposed to be like Magneto. It goes against half a century of character development.

morrison's cyke sucked, but I'll give you whedon. he really made cyclops work.

it sure does break away from his last 50 years of characterization, but that hyper-repressed boyscout routine had really become stagnant IMO. now he is being taken in new directions and I'm digging it, if theres one thing I can't stand it's the eternal maintenance of status quo.

Originally posted by 753
morrison's cyke sucked, but I'll give you whedon. he really made cyclops work.

it sure does break away from his last 50 years of characterization, but that hyper-repressed boyscout routine had really become stagnant IMO. now he is being taken in new directions and I'm digging it, if theres one thing I can't stand it's the eternal maintenance of status quo.

You didn't like Morrison's one?

Whedon's one was similar to Simonsen's one, just a little darker, and Simonsen wrote him two decades ago.

They were developing him though; that was the point. They were changing him while still keeping him faithful, and it was working. Turning him in to Magneto basically means that it isn't Cyclops anymore, at least, it's not the same guy.