JMS Thor with Odin Force Vs Superman on panel feats!

Started by Silent Master7 pages

Nope, I used your method correctly.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nope, I used your method correctly.

The 'voices' on the 'interwebbe' told you that and they are wrong😖hifty:. May I say I admire your ironic and satirical screen name. 😂

If you don't like the results of your method for gauging power level, you only have yourself to blame.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you don't like the results of your method for gauging power level, you only have yourself to blame.

Note to 'Vocal Beginner'😖hifty:, learn to read before going on message boards and humiliating yourself. 🙂

If you don't like the results of your method for gauging power level, you only have yourself to blame.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you don't like the results of your method for gauging power level, you only have yourself to blame.

derp...

I think this thread needs to get closed because it ended in a spamming and trolling thread.Not to mention this is a bait thread.Bait threads are against the rules anyways 😮‍💨

Originally posted by Igniz
I think this thread needs to get closed because it ended in a spamming and trolling thread.Not to mention this is a bait thread.Bait threads are against the rules anyways 😮‍💨

Just because many people disagreed with how you wanted a thread outcome doesn't make it a bait thread and responding and clarifying to people who have trouble reading and understanding is neither baiting or trolling. 🙂 I get you and the youngsters like Thor and Bor.

Guys, no more bashing. Get back on topic, please.

Originally posted by Male Model
Just because many people disagreed with how you wanted a thread outcome doesn't make it a bait thread and responding and clarifying to people who have trouble reading and understanding is neither baiting or trolling. 🙂 I get you and the youngsters like Thor and Bor.

And this thread was done after your point in the other thread(Bor Vs Superman and Captain Marvel) didn't get through.I disagreed with this thread on how feats aren't the be all end all.TOAA Vs Superman(high end feats only)=Superman wins this based on feats.That's basically how your logic is Raisen.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Guys, no more bashing. Get back on topic, please.

Or just simply close this thread.Why prolong it 😎 Just sayin 😄

Originally posted by -Pr-
Guys, no more bashing. Get back on topic, please.
Okay, and thank you for being polite.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
I'll spell it out because you got mad and are making no sence my original post was that all abstract lvl strength feats should not be used...

Not sure why me informing a new member about Kmc s.o.p.'s got you and H1 arguing with me about this but ok, I'm just not going to argue about that anymore...

On topic, do you think a standard pre flashpoint superman could tank and continue a fight after taking a blast that one shot killed Thor? Do you think their combined durability is that far apart?


Who's mad? Also good for you.

A statement isn't something that can be trusted entirely especially coming from Thor who's known for boasting. However what has actually killed Thor or was going to kill Thor i.e. Durok punching him and then electrocuting him with the power of a city, I don't see why superman can't go fighting after that. Mind you in one of the lowest showings of Superman in last decade, he was only stunned for a moment taking the power supply of Metropolis after being exposed to kryptonite.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Who's mad? Also good for you.

A statement isn't something that can be trusted entirely especially coming from Thor who's known for boasting. However what has actually killed Thor or was going to kill Thor i.e. Durok punching him and then electrocuting him with the power of a city, I don't see why superman can't go fighting after that. Mind you in one of the lowest showings of Superman in last decade, he was only stunned for a moment taking the power supply of Metropolis after being exposed to kryptonite.

So statements isn't acceptable "sometimer"?

Originally posted by carver9
So statements isn't acceptable "sometimer"?

Not when there is proof to the contrary.

Originally posted by Igniz
And this thread was done after your point in the other thread(Bor Vs Superman and Captain Marvel) didn't get through.I disagreed with this thread on how feats aren't the be all end all.TOAA Vs Superman(high end feats only)=Superman wins this based on feats.That's basically how your logic is Raisen.

His logic is Raisen? Why are you bringing me up?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Who's mad? Also good for you.

A statement isn't something that can be trusted entirely especially coming from Thor who's known for boasting. However what has actually killed Thor or was going to kill Thor i.e. Durok punching him and then electrocuting him with the power of a city, I don't see why superman can't go fighting after that. Mind you in one of the lowest showings of Superman in last decade, he was only stunned for a moment taking the power supply of Metropolis after being exposed to kryptonite.

You pick and choose which statements count and which don't.

Originally posted by carver9
How about tanking the Destroyer beam? How about fighting someone destroying a moon during the process? How about recreating the moon. Lifting asgard? Fighting BOR, someone that was stated as being capable of killing a high Herald in a single hit? There is more but its pointless for me to bring it up. This is enough.

Supes' best feats in one page.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Not when there is proof to the contrary.

What about Superman statement about Femto (I know I spelled that wrong, my keys are messed up) second speed.?

Not in this fight thread,but,says superman can lift infinity page so he has infinite strength this was soo stupid,Pre-52 superman not infinite strength,even the most crazy superman,silver age superman was not infinite strength,and that also not has multiverse,It was recorded in the book of the information, a history,just all