Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]Wrong. Making money means success not quality
You're the one who has claimed the opposite, not me. I couldn't care less otherwise 😛
Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]The term quality is subjective
A term being subjective doesn't mean you get to take it out of context and use it as you see fit in a debate my friend, we debate movies and comics all the time and their content is subject to reader interpretations. There are still enough elements to judge such subjectivities in a reasonable and civilized way.
Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]I deem what I deem quality but opinions vary.
The thing is Quan, that you cannot say "this is quality", and expect the others to abide to it. A word being subjective doesn't mean it takes any meaning you want to it as you please, on the contrary, you should be much more careful when using that kind of terms.
You use the terms sloppily and then you say stuff like:
Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]If you're going to come at me don't be so dense and take the time to comprehend my message.
I really don't mean to come out as dense, but if you're going to complain about people misunderstanding you, you should use the terms in a less controversial manner. It isn't as if I was the only one pointing out the dubious value of these arguments.
For the record, don't ever bring to me the "subjectivity" argument on me, because I'll consider formally that you weasel out of defending your position. I have little patience for mediocre people who say "it's subjective so I don't get to build a valid opinion on it". Frigging hacks ahah
Anyways, I really don't want to sound rude or anything, just chatting around.
Originally posted by BentleyWhat someone deems as a quality film is subjective and not once did I say otherwise. A success in terms of overall profit is objective and factual. I have been right the entire time as usual despite your lack of comprehension. If I say vanilla ice cream is better than chocolate you can disagree but it's too subjective to argue. Taste always is. What is superior in terms of formidability is entirely different than personal preference.
You're the one who has claimed the opposite, not me. I couldn't care less otherwise 😛A term being subjective doesn't mean you get to take it out of context and use it as you see fit in a debate my friend, we debate movies and comics all the time and their content is subject to reader interpretations. There are still enough elements to judge such subjectivities in a reasonable and civilized way.
The thing is Quan, that you cannot say "this is quality", and expect the others to abide to it. A word being subjective doesn't mean it takes any meaning you want to it as you please, on the contrary, you should be much more careful when using that kind of terms.
You use the terms sloppily and then you say stuff like:
I really don't mean to come out as dense, but if you're going to complain about people misunderstanding you, you should use the terms in a less controversial manner. It isn't as if I was the only one pointing out the dubious value of these arguments.
For the record, don't ever bring to me the "subjectivity" argument on me, because I'll consider formally that you weasel out of defending your position. I have little patience for mediocre people who say "it's subjective so I don't get to build a valid opinion on it". Frigging hacks ahah
Anyways, I really don't want to sound rude or anything, just chatting around.
😂 Quanchi's still not getting it, even after Bentley held your hand and tried to walk you through it.
Just because some dunce thinks Troll 2 (1990) is a better quality film over The Godfather II (1974), doesn't mean it's factually so. Sure, he's free to think that and it would be his opinion, but it's objectively a stupid and failed opinion when you compare the two films in terms of story, dialogue and acting. ie Quality isn't [always] subjective, you muppet, so stop insisting it is. It rarely is in fact.
Originally posted by RobtardI never once said an opinion on personal taste is factual. It's just an opinion unlike an objective fact as total profit.
😂 Quanchi's still not getting it, even after Bentley held your hand and tried to walk you through it.Just because some dunce thinks Troll 2 (1990) is a better quality film over The Godfather II (1974), doesn't mean it's factually so. Sure, he's free to think that and it would be his opinion, but it's objectively a stupid and failed opinion when you compare the two films in terms of story, dialogue and acting. ie Quality isn't [always] subjective, you muppet, so stop insisting it is. It rarely is in fact.
Quality is subjective since that's just an opinion no matter how widely shared it may be, fraggle.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never once said an opinion on personal taste is factual. It's just an opinion unlike an objective fact as total profit.Quality is subjective since that's just an opinion no matter how widely shared it may be, fraggle.
Really now, so if I hand you two wrenches their quality is "subjective" based on what you feel?
Never mind that one is sturdy, built to precise measurements and will last you decades, while the other is a cheap Chinese knock-off that barely covers its purpose and will easily break.
😂 You fail again, muppet. GTFO of my thread.
Originally posted by RobtardNo, but two wrenches clearly isn't subjective based on personal taste.
Really now, so if I hand you two wrenches their quality is "subjective" based on what you feel?Never mind that one is sturdy, built to precise measurements and will last you decades, while the other is a cheap Chinese knock-off that barely covers its purpose and will easily break.
😂 You fail again, muppet. GTFO of my thread.
Personal taste when it comes to entertainment is entirely different than a tool with a practical function.
😂
Oh my. Switching it back to "personal taste", when we're discussing [film]quality.
Repeat: You can prefer Troll 2 over The Godfather 2 and that's your personal preference. But that doesn't make it a higher quality film on that merit alone. Story, dialogue, acting, script, directing etc. does.
Not sure if you're just stupid or employing the Quanchi dancing tactics when you've got nothing left. I'm at 50/50 right now.
Originally posted by RobtardIt's always been personal taste in judging these sort of things.
Oh my. Switching it back to "personal taste", when we're discussing [film]quality.Repeat: You can prefer Troll 2 over The Godfather 2 and that's your personal preference. But that doesn't make it a higher quality film on that merit alone. Story, dialogue, acting, script, directing etc. does.
Not sure if you're just stupid or employing the Quanchi dancing tactics when you've got nothing left. I'm at 50/50 right now.
Subjective. One can say Scarface is better than Godfather but neither opinion is correct. Subjective.
Comparing a functional tool with what ones personal taste regarding films displays once again you.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It's always been personal taste in judging these sort of things.Subjective. One can say Scarface is better than Godfather but neither opinion is correct. Subjective.
Comparing a functional tool with what ones personal taste regarding films displays once again you.
I've tried and Bentley has tried(was there a 3rd person?), you're just too dense to get the difference between "taste" and "quality" and personal taste not making quality.
Yeah, thanks. Covered that in the greater whole. But as noted above, you can't follow.
WTF? You're talking gibberish again, you do this often when beaten. Calm down and rework that sentence so it makes sense. 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardNo, there's a clear difference. You want to compare apples to oranges.
I've tried and Bentley has tried, you're just to dense to get the difference between "taste" and "qaulity"Yeah, thanks. Covered that. But as noted above, you can't follow.
😂 WTF? You're talking gibberish again, you do this often when beaten. Calm down and rework that sentence so it makes sense.
Personal taste on what one deems quality is subjective just like Oscars. No right answer. Just a general consensus from the right people get you the award.
Originally posted by quanchi112Correct; that's what people have been trying to beat into you. Now you're acting like you got it all along, how adorable. They're both fruit 🙂 Cry more now.
No, there's a clear difference. You want to compare apples to oranges.Personal taste on what one deems quality is subjective just like Oscars. No right answer. Just a general consensus from the right people get you the award.
Or you know, The Godfather II is factually a higher quality film than say Troll 2. 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardWrong but according to you the answer is always clear. I do agree that troll 2 stinks but that is just my opinion. It's not a fact even though you'd have to search the world to find someone who disagrees.
and the expected derp response in order to dodge. Cry more now.Or you know, The Godfather II is factually a higher quality film than say Troll 2.