Originally posted by juggermanIn the movies Voldemort says so but you say that doesn't count. The burden is on you to disprove what everything else leads to believe. You do this in every thread. Make up some jackass theory and say I have no disprove something with no evidence to believe in the first place. There's always evidence to the contrary also.
Notice how if anyone else mentions what J.K. said quanny will come out and reem them since "this is about the movies not the books" but he'll turn around and do it when it suits his shitty points.Cuz he's never been wrong about anything ever. Think for once! 😛
Originally posted by quanchi112
In the movies Voldemort says so but you say that doesn't count. The burden is on you to disprove what everything else leads to believe. You do this in every thread. Make up some jackass theory and say I have no disprove something with no evidence to believe in the first place. There's always evidence to the contrary also.
He also says the Elder Wand belongs to him. He also says using Malfoy's wand will overcome his and Potter's connection. He also believes he made only 7 Horcruxes. But yeah let's just take his word.
Originally posted by Silent Master
So basically, you have no proof.Thank you.
👆
Originally posted by Silent Master
It was rather easy tricking him into admitting that he has nothing but
an unsubstantiated character statement. something that has never been considered proof by board standards.
He considers it proof when it aids him. It's the quantroll way when he's clearly losing. Over in AvF he's quoting a wiki page as proof of something when he consistently would call foul on others that did so. Silly quan
Originally posted by juggermanHe isn't all knowing and there are things he didn't have knowledge of. New ground was covered here due to their connection which he wasn't entirely aware of. He was aware of the Horcruxes function.
He also says the Elder Wand belongs to him. He also says using Malfoy's wand will overcome his and Potter's connection. He also believes he made only 7 Horcruxes. But yeah let's just take his word.👆
I put up J.k. Rowlings word but you ignore that despite no proof he will die of old age. Your claim now prove it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He isn't all knowing and there are things he didn't have knowledge of. New ground was covered here due to their connection which he wasn't entirely aware of. He was aware of the Horcruxes function.I put up J.k. Rowlings word but you ignore that despite no proof he will die of old age. Your claim now prove it.
He isn't all knowing and he didn't realise that they had the limits they clearly do. He ages therefore he dies
Originally posted by juggermanHe can trap pieces of his soul into objects so no the rules of our reality don't apply to theirs especially when Horcruxes make one immortal and the creator of the series defines it as well as the movie series. Burden is on you.
He isn't all knowing and he didn't realise that they had the limits they clearly do. He ages therefore he dies
Originally posted by quanchi112
If I go put them in later and find something in the extras about Horcruxes will you admit you were wrong ?
If the creators of the movies or books stated in GoF Harry was a more skilled/powerful wizard then Voldemort was would you admit Voldemort was trash? Or that Neville could have easily killed Voldemort but simply chose not to due to him enjoying the chaos would you admit Voldemort was not as great as you thought? Things actually shown outweigh writer statements. He was not immortal
Originally posted by juggerman
Creator of the movies?
Originally posted by juggermanThis right here sums it up. You yourself say did the creator of the movies say so ? Then you distance yourself from your post in the very next one. You are a brick wall.
If the creators of the movies or books stated in GoF Harry was a more skilled/powerful wizard then Voldemort was would you admit Voldemort was trash? Or that Neville could have easily killed Voldemort but simply chose not to due to him enjoying the chaos would you admit Voldemort was not as great as you thought? Things actually shown outweigh writer statements. He was not immortal
Basically your debating consists of I have made up my mind and even if the creators of both the books and movies agree while confirming Voldemorts statement in the movies you say nuh uh he can die by old age despite that never happening.
I found the movie people state in an extra Voldemort is greater than Dumbledore too confirming I got it but you don't. You live in your own world while beating on your chest screaming in a defiant voice, "The sky is red and no one can convince me otherwise."
Originally posted by quanchi112
This right here sums it up. You yourself say did the creator of the movies say so ? Then you distance yourself from your post in the very next one. You are a brick wall.Basically your debating consists of I have made up my mind and even if the creators of both the books and movies agree while confirming Voldemorts statement in the movies you say nuh uh he can die by old age despite that never happening.
I found the movie people state in an extra Voldemort is greater than Dumbledore too confirming I got it but you don't. You live in your own world while beating on your chest screaming in a defiant voice, "The sky is red and no one can convince me otherwise."
I asked a simple question since you seem to think creator of the book statements only hold weight when you want them to. Geez you can't even tell when you're being made fun of.
So if dying of old age never happens it means it will never happen to a character? Wow man.
I see you didn't answer my questions tho.....