Imhotep vs Voldemort

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It hit Harry, and no one died. The counter is known in universe to be a 'simple charm'. Also lol at you implying it's the only counter.

I ask for evidence, you make an impossible to prove claim. Emotep is immortal and Ganondorf is not only immortal but has magic resistance that would allow him to shrug off armies of HP Wizards all at once.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wrong. If he's killed how can he heal his body ? You can't be really this slow.

Yes.

No.

Yes, her actions mattered not his. Voldemort even explains this to him in GOF.

That's resisting possession not winning a fight. He already lost when he was disarmed.

He lost the fight. That's the point. Pretended he was dead like a coward and ran away.

Imhotep also needed others to bring him back but unlike Imhotep Voldemort still existed. 😂

He was worried about LIVING FOREVER! Not about being killed. If he could halt ageing and therefore live forever he would not need the Horcruxes. Wow you are really dumb

No

Yes

And her actions enabled him to defeat Voldemort

Voldemort tried to do something and Harry denied him. That's a win for Harry any way you slice it.

There wasn't a fight to lose. If i walk up to a guy and let him KO without trying to defend myself at all is that a fight? No dum dum

I never claimed Imhotep didn't use others. Way to counter a non existent stance 😂

Also i happened to notice you completely avoided all the points i made about Voldemort losing many times

Originally posted by juggerman
He was worried about LIVING FOREVER! Not about being killed. If he could halt ageing and therefore live forever he would not need the Horcruxes. Wow you are really dumb

No

Yes

And her actions enabled him to defeat Voldemort

Voldemort tried to do something and Harry denied him. That's a win for Harry any way you slice it.

There wasn't a fight to lose. If i walk up to a guy and let him KO without trying to defend myself at all is that a fight? No dum dum

I never claimed Imhotep didn't use others. Way to counter a non existent stance 😂

Also i happened to notice you completely avoided all the points i made about Voldemort losing many times

Yes.

No.

Her actions enabled him to survive. That's it.

That's resisting. If someone puts you in a headlock you break,the hold and flee. You don't get to say he won the fight. The guy fled.

Yes, you just lost. You accepted losing. That's all.

Voldemort didn't. Imhotep lost despite having help against Rick.

You ignored the context while I owned you.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

Originally posted by quanchi112
He can only love forever by making Horcruxes. That's the point. It's magic, kid.

Yes.

No.

Her actions enabled him to survive. That's it.

That's resisting. If someone puts you in a headlock you break,the hold and flee. You don't get to say he won the fight. The guy fled.

Yes, you just lost. You accepted losing. That's all.

Voldemort didn't. Imhotep lost despite having help against Rick.

You ignored the context while I owned you.

So he can't make an immortal body? Good glad we're past that nonsense

No.

Yes.

Enabled him to destroy Voldemort

His goal was to survive the encounter. Voldemort's goal was to kill Harry. Only one of them achieved their goal. Vold lost

Not a fight. Vold walked right into his trap

You ignored everything. Harry bested Vold many MANY times

Originally posted by juggerman
So he can't make an immortal body? Good glad we're past that nonsense

No.

Yes.

Enabled him to destroy Voldemort

His goal was to survive the encounter. Voldemort's goal was to kill Harry. Only one of them achieved their goal. Vold lost

Not a fight. Vold walked right into his trap

You ignored everything. Harry bested Vold many MANY times

His goal was to survive not to win the fight which he lost. He Wasnt even going to fight back.

No, it was a fight in which Harry lost.

Not once in a fair straight up fight whereas Voldemort defeated him multiple times.

Imhotep loses as he's accustomed to losing so he won't be upset.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, he can. Your claim though which you don't prove just ignore everything which says otherwise.
Yes.
No.
Wand Wasnt his and there's a whole lot of context you ignore.

His goal was to survive not to win the fight which he lost. He Wasnt even going to fight back.

No, it was a fight in which Harry lost.

Not once in a fair straight up fight whereas Voldemort defeated him multiple times.

Imhotep loses as he's accustomed to losing so he won't be upset.

He cannot. He used the Horcruxes to try to achieve this goal.

No.

Yes.

And he knew that yet still tried like a goon

His goal was to leave with his life. He achieved this goal. Vold did not achieve his. Ever.

Nope

Harry bested him in SS, CoS, GoF, OotP, and DH2. Vold has a losing record.

Ha I was about to say the very same thing about Voldemort

Originally posted by juggerman
He cannot. He used the Horcruxes to try to achieve this goal.

No.

Yes.

And he knew that yet still tried like a goon

His goal was to leave with his life. He achieved this goal. Vold did not achieve his. Ever.

Nope

Harry bested him in SS, CoS, GoF, OotP, and DH2. Vold has a losing record.

Ha I was about to say the very same thing about Voldemort

Yes.
No.

Who acted like a goon ?

To live and survive at all costs due to knowing he can't beat him in a fair fight.

No, I already dissected you point by point.

Voldemort ruled the land twice whereas Imhotep failed twice.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Only counter in film. When it hits someone they die unlike Drf against Midna. Ak kills him.

In the movie Harry was hit and didn't die. You've admitted this.

AK has never killed an immortal, it cannot kill Emotep.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Shittiest possible example as Midna didn't scratch Dorf, and she hit him so hard his castle exploded.

In the movie Harry was hit and didn't die. You've admitted this.

AK has never killed an immortal, it cannot kill Emotep.

Due to love protection unavailable here.

Yes, it has. Imhotep has no magical resistance feats at all.

Quan doesn't like a feat, calls it speculation.

Due to protection. AK has always failed against any kind of protection.

Emotep is immortal, it cannot kill an immortal.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Quan doesn't like a feat, calls it speculation.

Due to protection. AK has always failed against any kind of protection.

Emotep is immortal, it cannot kill an immortal.

Dorf doesn't have any protection nor does Imhotep. That tactic in viable anyways.

Prove it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Feat happens off screen leaving the details speculation.

Dorf doesn't have any protection nor does Imhotep. That tactic in viable anyways.

Prove it.

Dorf has the ToP which makes him immortal and allows him to shrug off demigods in arrow form. Emotep is immortal. AK can harm neither by feats.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He achieved his goal and was immortal. Prove he was wrong about immortality.

Yes.
No.

Who acted like a goon ?

To live and survive at all costs due to knowing he can't beat him in a fair fight.

No, I already dissected you point by point.

Voldemort ruled the land twice whereas Imhotep failed twice.

He aged

No.

Yes.

Vold. He knew the wand wasn't his yet still tried to use it.

So Harry achieved his goal and denied Voldemort his.

Negative. You've been destroyed at every turn

He was beaten by a kid several times. Imhotep's reach was farther than Vold's

EDIT: Also what immortal has the AK killed?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The details are laid out on screen for us, nice try, also wrong thread.

Dorf has the ToP which makes him immortal and allows him to shrug off demigods in arrow form. Emotep is immortal. AK can harm neither by feats.

No, we see him die. We see Imhotep die. Immortality doesn't mean unkillable.

Ak kills. No specific magic resistance from either character. 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
He aged

No.

Yes.

Vold. He knew the wand wasn't his yet still tried to use it.

So Harry achieved his goal and denied Voldemort his.

Negative. You've been destroyed at every turn

He was beaten by a kid several times. Imhotep's reach was farther than Vold's

EDIT: Also what immortal has the AK killed?

Yes.
No.

He thought he was the owner after killing Snape. He isn't all knowing.

Harry escaped. He survived due to aid of others. Not the first time. Resisting possession isn't winning a fight.

You are laughable.

No, you are ignoring the context.

Imhotep was beaten easily both times despite help and being against normal humans.

Watch the films and find out.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Prove he'd die. That's your claim. Quit imposing real world logic in a fictional setting.

Yes.
No.

He thought he was the owner after killing Snape. He isn't all knowing.

Harry escaped. He survived due to aid of others. Not the first time. Resisting possession isn't winning a fight.

You are laughable.

No, you are ignoring the context.

Imhotep was beaten easily both times despite help and being against normal humans.

Watch the films and find out.

Prove he could make immortal bodies as per your claim.

Nope.

Yup.

Harry outright told him and still he sat there and tried to use it like a duma$$.

Harry survived as he wanted to. Vold did not get what he wanted. Defeating Vold in a mind battle is another win for the boy

Every turn you are destroyed

Ignoring nothing. Harry won and Vold lost. Every single encounter.

Vold rose to power and was slapped down by a baby. He rose to power again and was slapped down by the same kid years later. Sad and sad.

I did unlike you. "A spear toss owned him" 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
Prove he could make immortal bodies as per your claim.

Nope.

Yup.

Harry outright told him and still he sat there and tried to use it like a duma$$.

Harry survived as he wanted to. Vold did not get what he wanted. Defeating Vold in a mind battle is another win for the boy

Every turn you are destroyed

Ignoring nothing. Harry won and Vold lost. Every single encounter.

Vold rose to power and was slapped down by a baby. He rose to power again and was slapped down by the same kid years later. Sad and sad.

I did unlike you. "A spear toss owned him" 😂

Yes.

Nope.

At that point Voldemort had no choice but to attack him with the wand. Harry had help and was still getting smacked around despite the wand not being Voldemorts which is a testament to his overall abilities.

Harry was scared and could have died if he chose not to return. Voldemort was unaware.

He resisted he didn't defeat. Someone on their back in fear isn't a win.

Context.

No, his mother aided him. How lies have fed your legend. Per movie. 😂

Yes, a spear toss owned Dragon King as he was retarded and not even looking. Rick stopped Imhotep again. Easy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The movie and JK Rowling agree. You have nothing but a baseless claim.

Yes.

Nope.

At that point Voldemort had no choice but to attack him with the wand. Harry had help and was still getting smacked around despite the wand not being Voldemorts which is a testament to his overall abilities.

Harry was scared and could have died if he chose not to return. Voldemort was unaware.

He resisted he didn't defeat. Someone on their back in fear isn't a win.

Context.

No, his mother aided him. How lies have fed your legend. Per movie. 😂

Yes, a spear toss owned Dragon King as he was retarded and not even looking. Rick stopped Imhotep again. Easy.

Wrong. You claimed he made an immortal body. JK said it's the Horcruxes that wizards make to try to become immortal. You've proven nothing

No

Yes.

So he gets the wand in hopes that it's added power overcomes their connection, they upon learning it is not his so will not increase his power decides to use it regardless? And Harry spelled out for him that Harry was the rightful owner yet dummy still tried 😂

Vold was unaware he was being played like a fiddle? Speaks volumes.

Getting beat by someone on their back in fear is horrible. And Harry was clearly not in fear since he was smack talking Vold to boot 😂

Is what proves me right

Bounced off of Harry. Harry still defeated Vold multiple times. at least 6 by my count

You mean when he was fighting someone else? Spear toss did nothing yet "owned" 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, they aren't. As we simply don't know.

No, we see him die. We see Imhotep die. Immortality doesn't mean unkillable.

Ak kills. No specific magic resistance from either character. 😂

Oh look, a claim you've never proven. He sure was upright for someone who apparently died, and then returned later in the same timeline. Durrrrr.

That's funny since AK lacks the feats to kill anything even remotely hard to kill. The only things it has killed are things I could kill by hitting them with a rock. Emotep on the other hand (and especially Ganon, lol.) would shrug off a rock to the skull and then kill the hell out of Voldemort.