Imhotep vs Voldemort

Originally posted by juggerman
Neither did Harry, let's just assume he can't shall we?

Yup

Nope

Evelyn told him what they needed. She learned about it thru studies. Studies about Egyptian magic and gods. Basically she got the info from the source of his power. I'd that's better than the cryptic messages Harry got

Harry owned Voldemort much more easily. He just sat there giggling while Voldemort destroyed himself. Sad

Nope.

Yep.

So you're saying Dumbledore, his parents, friends, Hogwart allies, etc. is less help that what she learned.
😂

Neville attacked and killed Nagini and was the rightful ruler of the Elder wand. Context. One on one in a fair fight Voldemort destroys him unlike Imhotep and Rick.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Harry wasn't immortal. Harry didn't hide his soul into vessels to become immortal. To back your claim you have to prove Voldemort would have died of old age.

Nope.

Yep.

So you're saying Dumbledore, his parents, friends, Hogwart allies, etc. is less help that what she learned.
😂

Neville attacked and killed Nagini and was the rightful ruler of the Elder wand. Context. One on one in a fair fight Voldemort destroys him unlike Imhotep and Rick.

So if we don't see it then it cannot happen right? So Harry was immortal iyo

Yes

Nah

Pretty much. She basically had a "How to" guide on beating Imhotep. Harry had to figure out a shitload on his own

Voldemort couldn't beat Harry one on one any of the times they squared off save for his sneak attack in OotP

Originally posted by juggerman
So if we don't see it then it cannot happen right? So Harry was immortal iyo

Yes

Nah

Pretty much. She basically had a "How to" guide on beating Imhotep. Harry had to figure out a shitload on his own

Voldemort couldn't beat Harry one on one any of the times they squared off save for his sneak attack in OotP

No.

Yes.

Harry had help. Imhotep can be easily beaten. Glad you agree it's easy and not hard.

Beat him in GOF due to fleeing. Beat him in OOTP. Beat him in DH 2.

Crushes Imhotep.

I'd like to point out Quan doesn't actually realize what happened when Harry was an infant. He seems to think, despite us seeing otherwise on screen, that the spell reflected off of Lily, not Harry who was protected and (gasp) has a scar.

AK cannot kill an immortal without feats.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Harry didn't split his soul or claim to be immortal. That's why. You say forget what Voldemort says, JFK Rowling says, and say hey I know he can die from old age. Lol.

No.

Yes.

Harry had help. Imhotep can be easily beaten. Glad you agree it's easy and not hard.

Beat him in GOF due to fleeing. Beat him in OOTP. Beat him in DH 2.

Crushes Imhotep.

We still didn't see him die of old age ergo he cannot

Yes.

No.

Rick had help

Harry beat him as a baby. Beat him in GoF due to Vold not getting his way. Beat him in a mind battle in OotP. Beat him by making him kill part of his own soul. Beat him for good in DH 2. Check and mate

Voldemort dies

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'd like to point out Quan doesn't actually realize what happened when Harry was an infant. He seems to think, despite us seeing otherwise on screen, that the spell reflected off of Lily, not Harry who was protected and (gasp) has a scar.

AK cannot kill an immortal without feats.

👆

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'd like to point out Quan doesn't actually realize what happened when Harry was an infant. He seems to think, despite us seeing otherwise on screen, that the spell reflected off of Lily, not Harry who was protected and (gasp) has a scar.

AK cannot kill an immortal without feats.

Ak killed an immortal on screen. 😆

Originally posted by juggerman
We still didn't see him die of old age ergo he cannot

Yes.

No.

Rick had help

Harry beat him as a baby. Beat him in GoF due to Vold not getting his way. Beat him in a mind battle in OotP. Beat him by making him kill part of his own soul. Beat him for good in DH 2. Check and mate

Voldemort dies

👆

No.

Yes.

Harry's mother gave him protection. Harry had nothing to do with it. It was his mother.

Harry resisted possession after he lost a duel. Not a victory.

Harry didn't beat him by being Akd. That's a loss. Voldemort wasn't aware of the Horcrux though.

Rick solod him.

Voldemort wins, easily

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said she was killed which makes the spell even more formidable. Voldemort also has knowledge and is aware of this magic which isn't easy to even use in the first place.

Ak killed an immortal on screen. 😆

Proooove iiiit.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you admit then, that when he used the spell on Harry it bounced back, after having made contact with Harry?

Proooove iiiit.

You already know this.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Spell couldn't affect him due to special love protection. This makes Voldemort even more formidable though.

You already know this.

Then you'll have no problem supporting your argument, will you?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you acknowledge it bounced off of Harry, yes or no?

Then you'll have no problem supporting your argument, will you?

You already know the answer.

So you're saying that AK can be cast, hit someone, and no one die, even within just the relatively weak Harry Potter universe? Good to know.

Then support your argument.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you're saying that AK can be cast, hit someone, and no one die, even within just the relatively weak Harry Potter universe? Good to know.

Then support your argument.

Someone died too. Quit saying no one dies when Ak kills.

Dorf and Imhotep both die.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your claim so you need to prove it. It's like saying he can shoot fire from his ******* and demanding I disprove your ridiculous theory.

No.

Yes.

Harry's mother gave him protection. Harry had nothing to do with it. It was his mother.

Harry resisted possession after he lost a duel. Not a victory.

Harry didn't beat him by being Akd. That's a loss. Voldemort wasn't aware of the Horcrux though.

Rick solod him.

Voldemort wins, easily

Wrong. He aged since making a Horcrux therefore him aginbg is proven

Yes.

No.

Harry had everything to do with. Unless you believe she woud have protected anyone.

No duel took place. He fought off Voldemort's attempt. That's a victory

Harry tricked Voldemort into destroying a piece of himself. Another victory

Rick had help. Troll harder

Voldemort loses and you're mad about it

Originally posted by quanchi112
Someone died too. Quit saying no one dies when Ak kills.

You're kidding right? Voldemort fired 3 AK's and two people died. Therefore it's proven that the spell can hit a person and not kill anything

Originally posted by juggerman
Wrong. He aged since making a Horcrux therefore him aginbg is proven

Yes.

No.

Harry had everything to do with. Unless you believe she woud have protected anyone.

No duel took place. He fought off Voldemort's attempt. That's a victory

Harry tricked Voldemort into destroying a piece of himself. Another victory

Rick had help. Troll harder

Voldemort loses and you're mad about it

You're kidding right? Voldemort fired 3 AK's and two people died. Therefore it's proven that the spell can hit a person and not kill anything

Yes.

No.

All that was required was similar circumstances and someone he deeply loved. Insert anyone in Harry's place and the same results.

Voldemort won by disarming his opponent. That's winning in Potterverse.

No, he still lost. Voldemort was unaware but clearly won since the spell hit him.

Rick did so easily. Imhotep also had help in his wife and servants. Still went down, hard.

Ak wins.

Something or someone always dies. He knows about love protection charm so more formidable than ever.

Originally posted by quanchi112
There's a counter due to insane circumstances but won't work in a versus thread so irrelevant plus the fact Voldemort is aware of this counter now.

Someone died too. Quit saying no one dies when Ak kills.

Dorf and Imhotep both die.

I ask for evidence, you make an impossible to prove claim. Emotep is immortal and Ganondorf is not only immortal but has magic resistance that would allow him to shrug off armies of HP Wizards all at once.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He didn't age when he got a new body from the moment he killed Harry's mom.

Yes.

No.

All that was required was similar circumstances and someone he deeply loved. Insert anyone in Harry's place and the same results.

Voldemort won by disarming his opponent. That's winning in Potterverse.

No, he still lost. Voldemort was unaware but clearly won since the spell hit him.

Rick did so easily. Imhotep also had help in his wife and servants. Still went down, hard.

Ak wins.

Something or someone always dies. He knows about love protection charm so more formidable than ever.

His body was gone. It could not age since it did not exist

No.

Yes.

And there was no one she loved like she loved Harry, therefore Harry mattered a lot

Voldemort wanted to take over Harry's mind, Harry fought him off. Harry got what he wanted while Vold was denied. Harry won

Harry purposely allowed it to happen. Harry again got what he wanted. He won

And Vold went at it alot i guess huh? 😂 Rick had more help then Harry so Harry beating Vold is worse for Vold

Clearly not

Yet the one he used on baby Harry killed no one/nothing.

Originally posted by juggerman
His body was gone. It could not age since it did not exist

No.

Yes.

And there was no one she loved like she loved Harry, therefore Harry mattered a lot

Voldemort wanted to take over Harry's mind, Harry fought him off. Harry got what he wanted while Vold was denied. Harry won

Harry purposely allowed it to happen. Harry again got what he wanted. He won

And Vold went at it alot i guess huh? 😂 Rick had more help then Harry so Harry beating Vold is worse for Vold

Clearly not

Yet the one he used on baby Harry killed no one/nothing.

Yes.

No.

Harry resisted possession after he lost the duel and Albus showed up to save his life.

Any self respecting mother does the same for a child so her actions mattered not his. He was recipient of her love but had nothing to do with it.

Harry did allow himself to be beaten. I agree due to knowledge of hidden Horcrux. Voldemort won.

Not at all. Imhotep would use help against a mortal unlike Voldemort who wouldn't let his pals interfere. Voldemort defeated Harry multiple times unlike Imhoteps two hitter quitter.

Killed somebody. That's for sure. It Wasnt Htry but somebody died, sport. Comprehension.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We also see Voldemort heal a had in Pettigrew but some how he can't stop his body dying of old age. To accept your line of logic we have to dismiss Rowling, films, purpose of Horcruxes, and say he would have died despite the mountain of evidence suggesting otherwise. Baseless claim 101.

Yes.

No.

Harry resisted possession after he lost the duel and Albus showed up to save his life.

Any self respecting mother does the same for a child so her actions mattered not his. He was recipient of her love but had nothing to do with it.

Harry did allow himself to be beaten. I agree due to knowledge of hidden Horcrux. Voldemort won.

Not at all. Imhotep would use help against a mortal unlike Voldemort who wouldn't let his pals interfere. Voldemort defeated Harry multiple times unlike Imhoteps two hitter quitter.

Killed somebody. That's for sure. It Wasnt Htry but somebody died, sport. Comprehension.

If he could he wouldn't need to Horcruxes smart guy.

No.

Yes.

Harry beat him at his own mind game.

Doesn't matter what other mothers would do. Fact is Harry was an important piece here.

Harry allowed himself to be hit which in turn was a victory against Vold

He sure needed minions to bring him back. And to storm Hogwartz. and for countless other things. He lost to Harry every time. GoF, Vold wanted to kill harry and failed. OotP he wanted to posess Harry and failed. DH2 he wanted to kill Harry in the woods and failed. Later he failed again in front of everyone. Hell Harry bested him in SS and CoS as well! 😂

The 3rd one killed nobody.

Originally posted by juggerman
If he could he wouldn't need to Horcruxes smart guy.

No.

Yes.

Harry beat him at his own mind game.

Doesn't matter what other mothers would do. Fact is Harry was an important piece here.

Harry allowed himself to be hit which in turn was a victory against Vold

He sure needed minions to bring him back. And to storm Hogwartz. and for countless other things. He lost to Harry every time. GoF, Vold wanted to kill harry and failed. OotP he wanted to posess Harry and failed. DH2 he wanted to kill Harry in the woods and failed. Later he failed again in front of everyone. Hell Harry bested him in SS and CoS as well! 😂

The 3rd one killed nobody.

Yes.

No.

Yes, her actions mattered not his. Voldemort even explains this to him in GOF.

That's resisting possession not winning a fight. He already lost when he was disarmed.

He lost the fight. That's the point. Pretended he was dead like a coward and ran away.

Imhotep also needed others to bring him back but unlike Imhotep Voldemort still existed. 😂