H.I.V. cure months away, Danish scientists say.

Started by Robtard4 pages

Originally posted by Oliver North
I didn't even think of this

its never been a better time to pick up a needle drug habit

You're welcome, but also consider the butt****ing of a monkey while you're at it. Don't want to limit yourself.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of you

😂

Originally posted by Oliver North
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of you

One of yours?

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/12/meanwhile-canada-monkey-winter-coat-escapes-ikea/59790/

Originally posted by Robtard
One of yours?

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/12/meanwhile-canada-monkey-winter-coat-escapes-ikea/59790/

seriously, you have no idea how big of a news story that was up here...

Originally posted by Oliver North
I didn't even think of this

its never been a better time to pick up a needle drug habit

So, what are your two cents on the topic, finally?

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
So, what are your two cents on the topic, finally?

what are my thoughts on a potential cheap and universally effective cure to aids?

seriously?

EDIT: meh, I'm unimpressed in general. Aids wasn't that tough of a nut to crack, should have been done ages ago. And really, taxpayer money could go to other things that are more impactful to my life, or other curable diseases. And there is just going to be another disease. In fact, I'm pissed off. How ****ing dare they cure aids, how ****ing dare they.

Originally posted by Tzeentch._
being correct =\= not being condescending.

Generally, Digi only comes on here for one of two reasons, either to talk about how awesome and mature he's gotten now that he doesn't come on here anymore, or to complain about someone's OP.

Anyway, the article is parroted on Fox, MD and the Telegraph... it took me three seconds to find that out on google. As for it "being a possibility", not a single person in this thread has stated nor implied that there was definitely a cure on the way, so pointing out that this is all "just possibilities" is basically just being redundant.

Oh cool, I've been singled out.

To your point, I've had 33K posts over nearly a decade on KMC. My recent time off notwithstanding, I feel like saying that I "generally" anything is probably a gross simplification. Also, the lone line of posts talking about me taking time off was rather apologetic. I felt bad...still do, to an extent. I gave up some commitments in the RP forums, and some lesser responsibilities in the comic forums. But I liked being gone. Not in a condescending way - KMC's awesome - just in a truthful way. I'll probably be less inclined to post in coming months/years; at least I hope so...I don't get as much enjoyment out of it anymore, fun as it still can be at times. So you're probably reading too much into my tone, or what you perceive as my tone. Maybe the post was heavy-handed. But I've been here too long and made too many internet-friends, and legitimately learned a lot, to condescend to the site as though I'm above it. If you're reading some perceived slight in my words, it's not there. You have my word.

And the sex stuff was a joke, "/smh" and all. I mean, c'mon, you think I actually cared that people were taking it down that path? When I joined - back in the 80's I think - someone told me I needed to include a smilie any time I was joking. Otherwise I'd be reprimanded for being a douche or too serious. Guess he was right.

313 ...that means it's a joke. Even toward you, that I'm poking fun at right now. We good? Yes? No? Babyrapingwolfcabbage? Good, that's settled.

Anyway. Maybe my point(s) was redundant, but it doesn't make it wrong. Nor unnecessary in many circles. Just look at how such announcements are normally received (i.e. read the headline, gloss over the rest, etc.). Maybe I'm preaching to the choir here on KMC. You'll have to forgive me. Old age and a massive ego can ravage the mind, you know.

Originally posted by Digi
Oh cool, I've been singled out.

To your point, I've had 33K posts over nearly a decade on KMC.

Pfff. Nerd.

Originally posted by Tzeentch._
being correct =\= not being condescending.

Anyway, the article is parroted on Fox, MD and the Telegraph... it took me three seconds to find that out on google. As for it "being a possibility", not a single person in this thread has stated nor implied that there was definitely a cure on the way, so pointing out that this is all "just possibilities" is basically just being redundant.


Yeah. I never said otherwise.

It was a reply to FistofTheNorth, who did imply that Digi was being paranoid...because he asked for facts.

(maybe he was joking or somesuch.)

Originally posted by Tzeentch._
Was replying to that Styletime lunatic. uhuh

In his defense, your post wasn't directly under the guy you were replying to....like mine was.

vin

Originally posted by Digi
Oh cool, I've been singled out.

He totally said he was singling me out. You and your
Originally posted by Digi
massive ego

keep hogging my spotlight.

uhuh

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Pfff. Nerd.

...you're just jealous of my internet #SWAG

Originally posted by StyleTime
I

Fist Digi

In his

hog spot

uhuh

O_o

The only known substance that can "cure" HIV is bleach and I don't see bleach pills being developed anytime soon.

Originally posted by Darth Truculent
The only known substance that can "cure" HIV is bleach and I don't see bleach pills being developed anytime soon.

HIV can actually be broken down by soap outside of the body along with many, many other substances, but bleach is not a cure.

In reality, there is a functional cure involving stem cells, but it is more than cost prohibitive for most at this point.

Originally posted by Digi
O_o

Only with your consent.

I ain't Mindset. uhuh

Originally posted by StyleTime
Only with your consent.

I ain't Mindset. uhuh

With Digi, consent is always implied.

Originally posted by Digi
...you're just jealous of my internet #SWAG

O_o


Digi, what did you mean when you said that I had swagoo?

Originally posted by Mindset
With Digi, consent is always implied.

biscuits

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Digi, what did you mean when you said that I had swagoo?

WUT.

But seriously, wut?

Originally posted by Digi
biscuits

WUT.

But seriously, wut?


I successfully confused you.

Victory is mine.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Yeah. I never said otherwise.

It was a reply to FistofTheNorth, who did imply that Digi was being paranoid...because he asked for facts.

No, wrong. Digi implied so when he wrote "I realize this kind of skepticism borders on paranoia.

"Another guy did it, so there's no way I could have done it too."

👆