Batman vs. Link

Started by quanchi11243 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Provide feats pls.

Concession accepted. You cannot prove Batman is superior to a Bulbin. Sad.

Zant defeated a regional demigod with a thought, and he did not KO Link, he polymorphed him. Something Batman can't do. Link is too physically durable to be ****ed with by a peak human, and swats Bats like a fly.

Bulbins henchmen. Canon.

Yes, I can but its as ridiculous as Superman flying. I don't honor ignorant requests.

No, he didn't. Link wasn't caught by this opponent nor was he highly skilled.

Link can easily be kod as proven by both examples. Batman wins, easily.

But not by physical attacks. Does batman know magic?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Bulbins henchmen. Canon.

Yes, I can but its as ridiculous as Superman flying. I don't honor ignorant requests.

No, he didn't. Link wasn't caught by this opponent nor was he highly skilled.

Link can easily be kod as proven by both examples. Batman wins, easily.


Not a feat for Batman

You have no proven that Batman is physically superior to a Bulbin so your argument that he is carries no weight.

What exactly are you arguing? Link was polymorphed. Later he got the Master Sword and this became a non-issue. Batman cannot polymorph him so it's irrelevant.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
But not by physical attacks. Does batman know magic?
Definitely. Batman is superior to Bulbins henchmen who physically stomped him.

He definitely knows magic? How strong do suppose bulbins are?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Not a feat for Batman

You have no proven that Batman is physically superior to a Bulbin so your argument that he is carries no weight.

What exactly are you arguing? Link was polymorphed. Later he got the Master Sword and this became a non-issue. Batman cannot polymorph him so it's irrelevant.

it is a disingenuous move on your end. It's like say Superman can fly. You know Batman destroys the henchmen but are being silly for Link.

Link gets kod since weak attacks have easily done so which Batman greatly surpasses in strength and skill.

Probably glossed over your words.. Why are you humping the random Bublin's leg but running from King Bublin's axe?

Originally posted by quanchi112
it is a disingenuous move on your end. It's like say Superman can fly. You know Batman destroys the henchmen but are being silly for Link.

Link gets kod since weak attacks have easily done so which Batman greatly surpasses in strength and skill.


Then prove it, if its' so abundantly apparent.

And then prove he can surpass King Bulbin's axe blow. 🙂

Link can't lose here, he's physically out of Batman's league.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Then prove it, if its' so abundantly apparent.

And then prove he can surpass King Bulbin's axe blow. 🙂

Link can't lose here, he's physically out of Batman's league.

No, I won't cater to your ignorance.

Survival doesn't mean immunity.

Batman can't lose as he is too skilled and strong to be touched by Link.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I won't cater to your ignorance.

Survival doesn't mean immunity.

Batman can't lose as he is too skilled and strong to be touched by Link.

That's fine, continue catering to your own.

Survival of 10 proves immunity to 1. It's all I need.

That's cute since Batman is completely outclassed by Link physically.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Probably glossed over your words.. Why are you humping the random Bublin's leg but running from King Bublin's axe?
Both are canon and both count. Difference of angle, etc.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
That's fine, continue catering to your own.

Survival of 10 proves immunity to 1. It's all I need.

That's cute since Batman is completely outclassed by Link physically.

no.

No.

No, batman is greater than henchmen who kod him easily.

It's more of a difference in timing....

Originally posted by quanchi112
no.

No.

No, batman is greater than henchmen who kod him easily.


Denial really is your default stance, isn't it? (Lemme guess, you're gonna say no.)

Prove it.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
It's more of a difference in timing....
Paste really cries when I bring up the ko.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Denial really is your default stance, isn't it? (Lemme guess, you're gonna say no.)

Prove it.

No.

It's silly and only an ignorant person would ask for proof of such a thing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No.

It's silly and only an ignorant person would ask for proof of such a thing.


Lol'd.

Then you cannot support it and you have no argument.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Lol'd.

Then you cannot support it and you have no argument.

You don't know anything about Batman. You're a child. Concession accepted.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You don't know anything about Batman. You're a child. Concession accepted.

You didn't provide any evidence to back your claim, if anyone concedes here it's you, by default, for having a stance you cannot support.

Link crushes.

Let's assume the only batman he knows is Nolan movies. Educate him.