The Mandarin vs. Thor

Originally posted by The Silent Hero
Why do people keep touting The Destroyer battle as a feat for Thor? It was seriously unimpressive. A couple of ray beams and that's it. Hell Sif put a spear through it which disabled it temporarily.

Iron Man has better feats.

Thor didn't even kill the Destroyer of his own power, he just reflected it's blast back at it.

Ironman would not have defeated the Destroyer Armor.

Asgardian weapons have proven to be highly effective. Sif's spear as far as anyone can be concerned simply forced its way through the bands that hold the armor together. Hence it twisting its way around to blast her off its back.

Thor's feat of taking it down was a combination of creating a powerful hurricane that lifted his opponent off the ground to allow him a straight target, and using Mjolnir to absorb the Destroyer's beam as he flew down and released/forced the energy straight back into the armor's visor.

Ironman could not repeat such a feat.

People compare the speed at which Thor took down the Destroyer with the threat the Destroyer itself represented. And that is a mistake.

Thor will defeat the Mandarin without too much trouble.
Whilst flying in the air and focusing concentrated lightning bolts straight through Killian.
A ground pound feat will result in Killian flying into the air which will allow Thor to continue his his assault.

Ironman can't replicate Thor's feats against the Destroyer. And Thor did defeat it with his own power.

"Cabin in the Woods" would curb stomp "Memento"

Originally posted by Insomniatric
And he was weaker when he literally stopped a leviathan in it's tracks with one punch and then held it in the air?

Originally posted by Silent Master
He wasn't as angry.

Lol at this ridiculous back and forth. We go by what we see on screen. Hulk's Leviathan feat > Hulk on Carrier feat. Deal with it.

What makes it better?

Originally posted by Silent Master
What makes it better?

Fan votes

Originally posted by Silent Master
What makes it better?

Physics.

Originally posted by juggerman
Fan votes

Right, if he's basing it on the fact that the Hulk flipped the Leviathan which weighs more than Thor, then he also has to take into account that the Hulk wasn't sending the smaller aliens flying...which would mean that the Hulk suddenly got massively weaker after that scene. That and Thor and Loki were only using human level strength in their fight, since they didn't send each other flying with every hit.

Same with Iron-man's headbutt, seeing as it didn't even move Thor.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Right, if he's basing it on the fact that the Hulk flipped the Leviathan which weighs more than Thor, then he also has to take into account that the Hulk wasn't sending the smaller aliens flying...which would mean that the Hulk suddenly got massively weaker after that scene. That and Thor and Loki were only using human level strength in their fight, since they didn't send each other flying with every hit.

Same with Iron-man's headbutt, seeing as it didn't even move Thor.

Well, we can agree on inconsistency then, something I've been pointing out since the film's release and most people have ignored until it suits their interest.

Hulk was angrier on the Helicarrier due to Loki's mind manipulations....which made every Avenger on board more aggressive.

That's why Hulk tried to kill the Black Widow. He had no control.

Whereas once Banner returned to New York for the invasion he was back to normal. In other words Hulk could now focus because Loki's manipulations had worn off.

Helicarrier- Hulk was nothing more than a raging monster.
New York- Hulk was back in control.