Thor Vs Superman(With a twist)

Not a direct confrontation between the two 😛 But rather, who would be easier to write a story between this two if we consider history of feats(barring the ones that are PIS for both of them),rouges of villains,character development,loved ones involved in their stories(family & friends)variety,more potential and etc.The goal here is to make a story that just wont cater to the fan base alone.So which of this two would be easier to write a story if you were tasked to write a story about them(for Superman or Thor)?

Honestly Supes is too much of a boyscout, it is easier to make a Thor story appeal to ppl outside of the fanbase. This is a problem the Man of Steel movie will have to overcome too.

Originally posted by Mshinu
Honestly Supes is too much of a boyscout, it is easier to make a Thor story appeal to ppl outside of the fanbase. This is a problem the Man of Steel movie will have to overcome too.

Only in the minds of idiots.

And while I love Thor, his concept of honour in many of the old comics bordered on retardation.

Originally posted by curryman
Only in the minds of idiots.

Superman`s boyscoutness and being too "super" are major obstacles in selling him to a larger audience. Most critics would agree on this, however enjoy sticking your head in the sand if you like.

Originally posted by Mshinu
Superman`s boyscoutness and being too "super" are major obstacles in selling him to a larger audience. Most critics would agree on this, however enjoy sticking your head in the sand if you like.

What critics?

All the ones who hated Superman Returns

Superman returns just sucked a little is all. Seeing superman get drowned like that was just depressing.

In all honesty, I think Superman is pretty easy to market to the mainstream. From what I've noticed, the average person just wants to see him having badass fights with other super people.

Returns had none of that. The suckiness had little to do with Superman being a "boy scout."

Superman is the more popular and well known character and has endured since the late 30's. He'd be easier to write a story for regardless of age range and regardless of whether or not your audience had even picked up a Superman comic before.

Ease of story writing, more or less equal. Both have a huge rogues gallery to draw from and wide range of feats, meaning any number of things can be plausibly written.

Ease of marketing, Superman. Simply because he is who he is.

^👆

I concur.

Iron Shiek > Ultimate Warrior

This shit can't be serious...

Originally posted by CosmicComet
This shit can't be serious...

Iron Shiek would make the Ultimate Warrior humble the old country way.

Originally posted by StyleTime
In all honesty, I think Superman is pretty easy to market to the mainstream. From what I've noticed, the average person just wants to see him having badass fights with other super people.

Returns had none of that. The suckiness had little to do with Superman being a "boy scout."

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Iron Shiek would make the Ultimate Warrior humble the old country way.

Not in kayfabe.

The Ultimate Warrior's feats there are like an ungodly fusion of Thor and Superman.

Shiek's shoot promos...

😂

"I'll fuk your ass! And make you humble!"

"Queering doesn't make the world work Sheik. LOAD THE SPACESHIP WITH DA ROCKETFUELLLLLL."

Warrior was backed by a pantheon of skyfathers. He's the end result if Thor and Superman did a fusion and then shouted "Shazam!".

No respect for the camel clutch. Pitiful!