Originally posted by RobtardWrong, wrong, wrong.
No you didn't. Stop lying.If you're just factoring movie ticket sales. Sure.
James Bond is another heavy hitter as well in the movie ticket department.
Total ballpark Potter wipes its ******* with Star Trek. It's a niche and that's it. Te new reboots give it hope since they aren't trash which can appeal to the general public.
James Bond isn't close either in terms of merchandising.
People are all ignoring the Harry Potter theme park and the money it makes as well.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Wrong, wrong, wrong.Total ballpark Potter wipes its ******* with Star Trek. It's a niche and that's it. Te new reboots give it hope since they aren't trash which can appeal to the general public.
James Bond isn't close either in terms of merchandising.
People are all ignoring the Harry Potter theme park and the money it makes as well.
Yeah, already showed that you don't know anything about Star Trek, no need for a repeat.
Harry Potter isn't on top, just deal with it already.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Wikipedia is Robtards one source for everything. Forget that any crackpot can edit the damn thing because Robbie believes in it.
Wiki list its reference sources.
boxofficemojo.com supports the 1.1billion figure, dumbass.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=bond23.htm
Now do your dance.
Originally posted by RobtardHold on I'm busy editing the entry to say 100 billion. You're wrong and rely on this site for everything aka Crabbe released Fiendfyre you knucklehead.
Wiki list its reference sources.boxofficemojo.com supports the 1.1billion figure, dumbass.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Quan, what are you arguing here, because Harry Potter certainly isn't the most profitable or influential film franchise. It didn't create a genre (like Bond) or bend genres (like Star Wars). It's an excellent story, but nothing original.
Basically, he's just crying because Harry Potter lost another contest.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/harry-potter-theme-park-hollywood_n_3146174.html
And yet another one on the way. I'm always right.