Wolverine vs Link

Who in the zelda community agrees with you? Most of us agree that the Downfall timeline was a stupid idea, but we all accept it as cannon along with everything else in the book.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Who in the zelda community agrees with you? Most of us agree that the Downfall timeline was a stupid idea, but we all accept it as cannon along with everything else in the book.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Dark Horse published it, I suppose Bloomsbury wrote Harry Potter, not Rowling?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Dark horse released it not Nintendo. Lol.

Supervising Editor
Eiji Aonuma (Nintendo) <---You may want to look into what this man's job is.

Design & Editing
Akaharu Tsuchida
Yasuyuki Kato
Kazuya Sakai (Ambit)
Naoyuki Kayama
Mika Kanno
Ginko Tatsumi
Hironori Sao
Junko Fukuda
Kunio Takayama (Shogakukan)
Tadahikio Abe
Coeditors
Florent Gorg es • Kevin Die • Chie Maruyama
Original Cover Design
Akemi Tobe
Originally published by Shogakukan Co., Ltd. First edition: December 2011."

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
"ORIGINAL JAPANESE EDITION
Publisher
Masahiko Shioya

Supervising Editor
Eiji Aonuma (Nintendo) <---You may want to look into what this man's job is.

Design & Editing
Akaharu Tsuchida
Yasuyuki Kato
Kazuya Sakai (Ambit)
Naoyuki Kayama
Mika Kanno
Ginko Tatsumi
Hironori Sao
Junko Fukuda
Kunio Takayama (Shogakukan)
Tadahikio Abe
Coeditors
Florent Gorg es • Kevin Die • Chie Maruyama
Original Cover Design
Akemi Tobe
Originally published by Shogakukan Co., Ltd. First edition: December 2011."

I love how this:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok, I own the book so all your theories are now disproven if they don't coincide with the book or is stated by your own words. I trapped you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Still released by dark horse not Nintendo. Manga isn't canon either as Zelda community is in an uproar.

haermm

Not only are you wrong, you're staring at why you're wrong in the face. It was not even originally published by Dark Horse, they only picked up the English translation. durlaugh

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I love how this:

Became this:

haermm

Not only are you wrong, you're staring at why you're wrong in the face. It was not even originally published by Dark Horse, they only picked up the English translation. durlaugh

Originally posted by quanchi112
You say the entire thing is canon not me. I agree the games part is canon to me but not the manga.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No one cares what you think. It's part of HH. HH is canon.

Most people ob zelda universe and Zelda dungeon seem to agree that HH is canon. I don't know what you're refering to.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Zelda community disagrees. Just because we both agree HH is canon with regards to the games doesn't mean it is unless you have an official statement from Nintendo. If it was open and shut with regards to manga then the Zelda community wouldn't be divided.

"This book is organized in four big sections. The first one, “The
First Story,” is an introduction to the new game Skyward Sword; the
second chapter, “The Full History of Hyrule,” follows the order of
events of the Zelda series chronologically; the third section,
“Creative Traces,” presents artwork from past games, including some
rough sketches; and the fourth part is a special manga by Akira
Himekawa, the leading author in charge of creating the manga of the
Zelda series."

Direct quote from Eiji Aonuma. The manga is part of Hyrule Historia.

Eiji himself was chief editor and guided the entire process of the book's creation. Hyrule Historia is canon.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
"This book is organized in four big sections. The first one, “The
First Story,” is an introduction to the new game Skyward Sword; the
second chapter, “The Full History of Hyrule,” follows the order of
events of the Zelda series chronologically; the third section,
“Creative Traces,” presents artwork from past games, including some
rough sketches; and the fourth part is a special manga by Akira
Himekawa, the leading author in charge of creating the manga of the
Zelda series."

Direct quote from Eiji Aonuma. The manga is part of Hyrule Historia.

Eiji himself was chief editor and guided the entire process of the book's creation. Hyrule Historia is canon.

It is part of the book but that isn't proof it's canon. Factually it's inside the book.

So you're in denial. That's all well and good. Concession accepted.

/Thread.

What do define as canon?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Most people ob zelda universe and Zelda dungeon seem to agree that HH is canon. I don't know what you're refering to.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you're in denial. That's all well and good. Concession accepted.

/Thread.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You just conceded. Wolverine wins.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You have no evidence that HH is non canon. Not any part of it. You have no statement from Nintendo, you have nothing singling it out, what you have is a case of denial and not wanting to deal with a feat. You lose. You brought HH into these debates and its' your own fault.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No statement from Nintendo saying the manga is canon. Zelda community also disagrees.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
"This book is organized in four big sections. The first one, “The
First Story,” is an introduction to the new game Skyward Sword; the
second chapter, “The Full History of Hyrule,” follows the order of
events of the Zelda series chronologically; the third section,
“Creative Traces,” presents artwork from past games, including some
rough sketches; and the fourth part is a special manga by Akira
Himekawa, the leading author in charge of creating the manga of the
Zelda series."

Direct quote from Eiji Aonuma. The manga is part of Hyrule Historia.

Eiji himself was chief editor and guided the entire process of the book's creation. Hyrule Historia is canon.

Wolverine wins.

Just give this one up, paste.

Link is bound to lose some -_-