Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Well, Thor's strength isn't his primary power nor does it have a "cap" that only increases over emotional duress. I don't think Hulk has "infinite strength", but his potential only climbs higher and higher and higher as his anger (ie. plot) demands.
Okay, I see the difference in that Thor doesn't have established limits where as Hulk has a limit that increases. But for all intents and purposes it just means that they're as strong as the plot demands.
Why is then Hulk always considered as strong as his maximum has allowed maybe once or twice where as Thor operate under a much more reasonable set of rules, where feats determine his capabilities. Sure he has a few incidents of fighting mid-heralds and high heralds (who are either gimped or holding back) but even when you, against all logic, would consider those fights his average then you still can't overlook the fact that these are levels he has to work to reach.
Superman and Thor stop holding back, the Hulk however needs to build up his anger. The Hulk is almost always giving it everything he's got (let Pak's retarded statement lie for a little while) where as Thor and Superman are actively not using their full powers. When they go all out then they suddenly fly into trans+++