What is the best Star Trek film of the 12 in existence ?

Originally posted by Robtard
Already went over this with him in the ST Vs ST thread, he claimed: "but everything changed in the regular timeline."

I had to explain that went the Narada appeared in the 23rd century, it created an alternate time-lime, but the original time-line still exist unchanged. He then did his usually flips and claimed he never made the clam.

Apparently, he still doesn't get it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It was boring and anti climactic along with poorly acted. There's a reason they changed the formula and it worked ie. the old formula wasn't working.

Originally posted by Omega Vision

TNG episodes such as "Darmok" and DS9 episodes such as "Beyond the Stars" would go over his head.

Originally posted by -Pr-
lol. We both know you don't believe that.

When you're ready to be honest to us and yourself, maybe we can talk.

You used the word "restarted" several times.

Yes, as this restarted the characters. That's exactly what happened in an alternate universe.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When did I say it replaced it. Both are canon. Two separate universes like in marvel, dc in which there are multiple.

You claimed the original timeline changed due to the Narada. It didn't and I explained to you that an alternate timeline was created. You then did flips and pretended you actually knew all along.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc. .

Now do more flips and pretend you knew all along as per your MO 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Quanchi doesn't like old school Star Trek because it was aimed at people with an iota of maturity and intelligence, and takes more than just an affinity for explosions and sword fights to appreciate.

TNG episodes such as "Darmok" and DS9 episodes such as "Beyond the Stars" would go over his head.

Darmok was just on last night 😛

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Are you referring to the entirety of the franchise? How many episodes have you actually watched of any of the series? Anti-climactic? What part? Do you even know what that word means?

Horrible lackluster films prior to reboot.

Originally posted by Robtard
You claimed the original timeline changed due to the Narada. It didn't and I explained to you that an alternate timeline was created. You then did flips and pretended you actually knew all along.

Now do more flips and pretend you knew all along as per your MO 🙂

Lol at your desperation.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Are you referring to the entirety of the franchise? How many episodes have you actually watched of any of the series? Anti-climactic? What part? Do you even know what that word means?

He's claimed he's seen a few over the years.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, starts off with I the resting ideas but fails to convey it through the course of a film to reach its conclusion.

Horrible lackluster films prior to reboot.

The fact that you missed my question either tells me that you have poor reading comprehension or that you know nothing of classic Trek, to the point that you may not even be aware that there were five tv series. Or both.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, everything changed in this timeline which occurred in the original through Narada, Neros involvement. That's why it's different due to different events taking place altering course of history.

Lol at your desperation.

Do more flips and pretend you didn't say this:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc. .

And then I didn't have to explain it:

Originally posted by Robtard
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong, the regular time-line (Shatner Kirk, Picard etc) is fine and unchanged. The new Star Trek takes place in an alternative time-line that is separate from year 2233 onward. Watch Star Trek 2009 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard

So, do you need an explosion or a swordfight or a dragon or a kung fu battle every ten minutes to stay involved in a story?

Originally posted by Robtard
Do more flips and pretend you didn't say this:

And then I didn't have to explain it:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, everything was the same and then changed due to Nero, etc. Thats an undeniable fact.

All your flips won't hide that you failed to grasp what was explained to you in Star Trek 2009:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc. .

Wrong.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, everything was the same and then changed due to Nero, etc. Thats an undeniable fact.

I can break down the sentences for you if it's too much reading.

Kurtzman told us of the newly established parallel "Trek" dimension,

Originally posted by Robtard
All your flips won't hide that you failed to grasp what was explained to you in Star Trek 2009:

Wrong.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but this timeline changes and won't go down the same path due to Nero. I never changed my position. You just make stuff up. It's your thing.

More flips won't hide that you clearly thought the regular timeline was changed (it isn't) and that you're a bandwagon-boy who didn't follow Star Trek 2009 very well 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc. .

Originally posted by Robtard
More flips won't hide that you clearly thought the regular timeline was changed (it isn't) and that you're a bandwagon-boy who didn't follow Star Trek 2009 very well 🙂