What is the best Star Trek film of the 12 in existence ?

Started by Robtard6 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, the new timeline changed from the same path the regular timeline went through thus making silly claims like progression of tech irrelevant to a different progressive universe.

In other words: 'When I said regular timeline, I really meant the alternate timeline, which I didn't know there was one and that it was the concept of the Abram's film until you told me and then I pretended like I knew all along.' 🙂

Proof:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc. .

Originally posted by Omega Vision
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1611063/star-trek-screenwriters-talk-sequel-plans.jhtml

I can break down the sentences for you if it's too much reading.

Yes, but restarted the series through a reboot in this manner.

JJ Abrams' Film Reboot Influenced Star Trek Online Expansion‎
6 days ago
The fate of the MMO's versions of Romulus and Remus was determined by the 2009 Star Trek film.
The Escapist819 related articles

Google it. If you can't understand what reboot means still pm me and I will help you. In between fighting your brother I hope you can find the time.

Originally posted by Robtard
In other words: 'When I said regular, I meant the alternate timeline, which I didn't know there was one and that was the concept of the Abram's film until you told me and then I pretended like I knew all along.'

Proof:

This event altered the events and the regular timeline. I am 100 percent right. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
This event altered the events and the regular timeline. I am 100 percent right. 😂

Incorrect still.

Repeat: The Narada going back didn't alter the regular timeline, that remains as is, the Narda's going back is just part of that timeline. The alternate timeline was created as an effect of the Narada's time travel.

Or just watch Star Trek 2009 again and pay attention 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc. .

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect still.

Repeat: The Narada going back didn't alter the regular timeline, that remains as is, the Narda's going back is just part of that timeline. The alternate timeline was created as an effect of the Narada's time travel.

Or just watch Star Trek 2009 again and pay attention 🙂

It altered the course of events in this timeline. I never said otherwise. You failing to grasp my meaning is par for the course.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It altered the course of events in this timeline. I never said otherwise. You failing to grasp my meaning is par for the course.

More flips to try and cover that you said and thought this:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc. .

Tell you what, PM an address and I'll mail you a copy of ST:2009, so you can re-watch and stop being an ignorant bandwagon-boy.

Originally posted by Robtard

👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, the new timeline changed from the same path the regular timeline went through thus making silly claims like progression of tech irrelevant to a different progressive universe.

Only if you completely abandon all logic.

I have to admit that, as arguably the biggest reboot fan on the board, I am somewhat surprised at your unwillingness to appreciate the movies for what they are, as opposed to your constant lobbying to make them something they're not.

Why can't you just appreciate the movies as is?

Originally posted by Robtard
More flips to try and cover that you said and thought this:

Tell you what, PM an address and I'll mail you a copy of ST:2009, so you can re-watch and stop being an ignorant bandwagon-boy.

You can continue to pretend what I said wasn't accurate. You don't have the guts required to battlezone anything. Just playing safe and flame from the sidelines.

Originally posted by -Pr-
👆

Only if you completely abandon all logic.

I have to admit that, as arguably the biggest reboot fan on the board, I am somewhat surprised at your unwillingness to appreciate the movies for what they are, as opposed to your constant lobbying to make them something they're not.

Why can't you just appreciate the movies as is?

I do love and appreciate them for the way they are. Robbie likes to do his your posts didn't cover this and pretend I didn't grasp it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do love and appreciate them for the way they are. Robbie likes to do his your posts didn't cover this and pretend I didn't grasp it.

Proof you didn't:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc..

Do more flips now. Free DVD offer still stands though, even the mailing will be on me.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do love and appreciate them for the way they are. Robbie likes to do his your posts didn't cover this and pretend I didn't grasp it.

I never said you didn't love or appreciate them. Just that you couldn't do it as much as the other Trek fans on the board due to ignorance of the many shout-outs/tributes/influences.

Originally posted by Robtard
Proof you didn't:

Do more flips now. Free DVD offer still stands though, even the mailing will be on me.

Nothing I said was inaccurate. Quit posturing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nothing I said was inaccurate. Quit posturing.

Except for this, bandwagon-boi:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but everything changed in the regular timeline from this moment on aka Kirks dad, etc.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I never said you didn't love or appreciate them. Just that you couldn't do it as much as the other Trek fans on the board due to ignorance of the many shout-outs/tributes/influences.
Most of the original Trekkies embrace and favor the older ones. That's my point. I think there is a huge contrast in both and greatly prefer the reboot ones.