Originally posted by RobtardI hate the old Star Trek. New Star Trek is a different animal. You prefer older lamer Star Trek. Get overthrow fact Khan hands Vader his ass.
Because I'm the one who has a history of shitting all over Star Trek and then going balls deep over Benedict Cumberbatch's role, making sigs and #1 fan claims? 😂 This is why you're an idiot bandwagon-boy. Also, stop misusing irony, you do it all the time.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthPublic perception is everything, Trekkie. Lol at your feelings being hurt.
Nah as it wouldnt be hand to hand: Itd be force choke/.End.By the way its not "Trekkie" its "Trekker".
Another basic noob mistake you made in your hurry to catch that departing bandwagon to failtroll city.
Reboot pure win.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthThats not an example of a combat force choke. Padme wasn't engaging him. Combat isn't a hard word to understand.
He did: He totally beat Padme's ass with it in ROTS, noob.It might be in your case:
"Other fans[who?] have recounted a tale that the term "Trekkies" was the original term that was adopted with the first Star Trek convention in 1972. However, by the second convention so many people had "jumped on the bandwagon" that the fans present at the second convention adopted the term "Trekkers" in order to distinguish themselves as the true fans, versus the fad fans who continued to use the term "Trekkies"...."
Trekkie. Public perception. Cry,
Why didn't Vader force choke Obi in combat ?
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilLightsaber can't block all laser fire only the thinner kind we see him block by lesser skilled opponents.
He has the strength/pain threshold advantage, but their combat speed and ability are about equal. As cool as that big Klingon killin canon was, lightsaber> phasers.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilOnly thinner laser fire not the Klingon wrecking shit big gun. Khans big gun >>light saber.
I don't remember a lightsaber ever failing to block a shot, I do, however, remember them cutting through blast shields that were designed to withstand continuous fire. Keep in mind that every shot in SW was designed to kill, none if this stunning nonsense from ST.
The smaller shots in ST aren't even deadly though. The Klingon canon may have had more thump, but they weren't much bigger. Khan has the advantage at long range, and if he could manage to get close enough with out getting chopped up he would have this in the bag, but skywalker's saber puts them pretty equal.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thats not an example of a combat force choke. Padme wasn't engaging him. Combat isn't a hard word to understand.Trekkie. Public perception. Cry,
Why didn't Vader force choke Obi in combat ?
He combatted her....and won. Choked her.
You're just a bandwagon riding fake.
A) Because he didn't want to.
B) Because he couldn't? Look at the force puch exchange for a clue
C) Because GL wanted a like 6 hour long lightsabre CGI battle instead
Originally posted by quanchi112
Public perception is everything, Trekkie. Lol at your feelings being hurt.
So 'everything' says you don't know what you're on about and laughs at your troling idiocy/constant wrongness.
The polls (reflecting public opinion) proved you wrong in all your butthurt Khan threads of late.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthShe wasn't fighting him. He just attacked his woman with no skill or power.
He combatted her....and won. Choked her.You're just a bandwagon riding fake.
A) Because he didn't want to.
B) Because he couldn't? Look at the force puch exchange for a clue
C) Because GL wanted a like 6 hour long lightsabre CGI battle instead
No, I am just an honest man. You like the originals I love the reboots.
Excuses. He can't do so. Not in character either. Vader uses his saber and tries to kill in close proximity of an opponent. Khan destroys him with his big gun.
One man army>>>emotional wreck who loses all the time.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthPeople have agreed with me here as well as other treads. I'm in the original Trekkies heads to badly you are going against Trek itself in order to go against me. Not true fans since you don't really care for the reboot. Original universe fans which is fine.
So 'everything' says you don't know what you're on about and laughs at your troling idiocy/constant wrongness.The polls (reflecting public opinion) proved you wrong in all your butthurt Khan threads of late.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilIt destroyed and brought down ships. It took off multiple limbs when it hit bodies. Far bigger and far deadlier fire than lame blaster fire from Star Wars. Star Trek can stun but their phasers don't have to.
The smaller shots in ST aren't even deadly though. The Klingon canon may have had more thump, but they weren't much bigger. Khan has the advantage at long range, and if he could manage to get close enough with out getting chopped up he would have this in the bag, but skywalker's saber puts them pretty equal.
No, Khan is a one man army unlike Vader.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
That tech was never used during the clone wars, so I assumed it was developed after the war to keep the empire ib check whithout killing the citizens.
Stun Blasts weren't used because 70% of the enemy forces were droids, and stun blasts don't work on droids.
The ability to use stun(just like on Star Trek), has been around forever.