Khan vs Steve Rogers

Originally posted by FrothByte
So you're planning to completely disregard everything that has been proven in previous Star Trek movies? When talking in the movie vs. forum, I'm assuming that all movies of a particular character are taken into account as long as they're in the same continuity. In this case, the feats of Spock and Klingons from other Star Trek movies count.

And before you redirect me with another question, how bout you first provide proof or at least a reason why you believe that a.) Cap is a superior fighter and b.) Cap being a better gunslinger.

If you can provide strength and durability feats for the people Khan fault, I'll be more than happy to accept them.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you can provide strength and durability feats for the people Khan fault, I'll be more than happy to accept them.

This goes both ways dude. You still need to provide proof why you think Cap's h2h feats are better than Khan's. As for strength for klingons and vulcans, anyone familiar with the Star Trek universe will tell you that both are stronger than humans. I'll have to go review the older movies to come up with specific feats, so I'll get back to you on that. In the meantime, I'm still waiting for your proof why you think Cap has better h2h and gunfighting skills.

As long as the feats are for the specific people Khan fought, after all Klingon and Vulcan strength would vary person to person.

Originally posted by Silent Master
As long as the feats are for the specific people Khan fought, after all Klingon and Vulcan strength would vary person to person.

Still waiting for you to state why you believe Cap is better than h2h or gun fighting though. You keep demanding proof while you yourself don't give any.

Klingons vary in individual strength in the same way that bears vary in individual strength. Still your average bear is stronger than any human. Same with a Klingon, your average Klingon is stronger than almost any (non-enhanced) human.

Originally posted by FrothByte

Klingons vary in individual strength in the same way that bears vary in individual strength. Still your average bear is stronger than any human. Same with a Klingon, your average Klingon is stronger than almost any (non-enhanced) human.

Not really, humans have beat the crap out of Klingons in h2h many times, from Riker to Sisko and heck even Kira!

What I would agree to though is that a particularly strong Klingon will be stronger than any non-enhanced human, like Worf or the Klingon Christopher Lloyd played in Star Trek 3.

Cap wins the 1st two easily. The 3rd one im leaning toward Cap as well but Khan might take it