Originally posted by h1a8
It wasn't silly in the light of not noticing the race of beings being spawned. I agree when it was pointed out.The evidence to support the statement was small planets have no atmosphere while bigger planets do. So your statement, "he has presented ZERO evidence to prove this theory" is false.
🙄
So, what you're saying is that what you said wasn't silly as long as we consider the fact that you didn't properly review all the facts in front of you before coming up with a conclusion?
😆
You're a silly boy.
You got proven wrong, just accept it and move on?
Read what I said again: "Zero evidence TO PROVE...". You presented a theory as "evidence" but in no ways does it prove anything. Thus, I was right. BAM!
Originally posted by carver9oh then what did the mechanism do?
It wasn't the skrulls that contained the blast and if it was their ship that exploded, then they would have died. Remember, the Xmen showed up to battle Gladiator in that same comic but it wasn't truly the Xmen, it was the same Skrulls Gladiator hawked down (that also hit him with that solar system destroying blast).Why do I need to show you him containing it when we clearly see him in the heart of the blast and the narrator saying "Gladiator strikes and a star is born)? Clear as day.
they could have very simply directed the blast outward sparing the ship, they didn't have to die in it. by the same token, how would you explain them surviving Gladiator's star creating blast?
you seem to have the cronological order of this entirely messed up. i havent read the issue so I need it spelled out.
what caused the blast that threatened the solar system? where is it shown that gladiator was the one to contain it? did he hit the ship in the starlike explosion afterward? was he releasing the energy you think he contained?
Originally posted by h1a8
It's not a bait attempt. If you thought you said something correct and another is saying no but not pointing it out then what would you think?
😆
Really? "Lying" is the only thing that can possibly occur here? Not "he thinks it's so stupid he doesn't wanna waste time trying to correct you?"
Originally posted by Nibedicus
🙄So, what you're saying is that what you said wasn't silly as long as we consider the fact that you didn't properly review all the facts in front of you before coming up with a conclusion?
😆
You're a silly boy.
You got proven wrong, just accept it and move on?
Read what I said again: "Zero evidence TO PROVE...". You presented a theory as "evidence" but in no ways does it prove anything. Thus, I was right. BAM!
That's correct. My reasoning is still sound (sound doesn't mean I'm correct though).
Silly means that you make a ludicrous claim while KNOWING all of the facts.
You said I provided zero evidence. This is clearly false since I stated a scientific fact supporting me. Are you saying that's a theory? If so then it has been proven the minimum mass a planet needs to sustain an atmosphere. I don't know the exact mass but it's certainly more than the moon but less than Earth.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
😆Really? "Lying" is the only thing that can possibly occur here? Not "he thinks it's so stupid he doesn't wanna waste time trying to correct you?"
That doesn't not compute since I feel my reasoning is flawless and I feel you are smart enough to understand it. So you thinking it's silly AFTER I learned and admitted to the Race of beings thing is asinine.
Originally posted by 753
oh then what did the mechanism do?they could have very simply directed the blast outward sparing the ship, they didn't have to die in it. by the same token, how would you explain them surviving Gladiator's star creating blast?
you seem to have the cronological order of this entirely messed up.
what caused the blast that threatened the solar system? where is it shown that gladiator was the one to contain it? did he hit the ship in the starlike explosion afterward? was he releasing the energy you think he contained?
The mechanism is what caused the blast.
By the time Gladiator left the blast (after containing it), the Skrulls was already on Earth.
They didn't need to survive it because they was on Earth during the time Gladiator flew out of the blast. That's why Gladiator attacked the Fantastic Four, he thought the Skrulls was posing as them.
He didn't hit the ship because again, the Skrulls was on Earth. Why would they have to show it when they quoted what happened during that instance: Gladiator strikes and a Star is born. A couple of scenes after this, Reed views the beam from outer space and states that the blast is being contained but again, by the time all of this happens, the Skrull is on Earth and Gladiator flew 100 times the speed of light to catch up to them (remember, their goal was to kill the fantastic four).
Your asking me to show you Gladiator containing the blast, how about you prove the Skrulls took place in containing said blast.
Originally posted by 753
if you say so, I never read that comic, which is I want the entire sequence intead of cropped scans to figure out the action
Originally posted by h1a8
That's correct. My reasoning is still sound (sound doesn't mean I'm correct though).
Silly means that you make a ludicrous claim while KNOWING all of the facts.You said I provided zero evidence. This is clearly false since I stated a scientific fact supporting me. Are you saying that's a theory? If so then it has been proven the minimum mass a planet needs to sustain an atmosphere. I don't know the exact mass but it's certainly more than the moon but less than Earth.
Nope, silly can be defined as foolish w/c can be defined as "resulting from stupidity or misinformation.." .
😆
Are you desperate or what? You got proven wrong and now you're attempting to use semantics to at least get one thing right to make yourself feel better and still manage to fall flat on your face. READ: "Zero evidence TO PROVE..."
You stated a theory and tried to use a scientific phenomena that loosely applies to the situation, that proves nothing. Nice try cropping what I said to change its context, tho.
You got proven wrong. Move on, buddy. This is so sad...
Originally posted by h1a8
That doesn't not compute since I feel my reasoning is flawless and I feel you are smart enough to understand it. So you thinking it's silly AFTER I learned and admitted to the Race of beings thing is asinine.
😆
I've already exposed flaws in your "reasoning" more than enough times today. I just don't feel like wasting anymore time with even more asinine stuff that you're spouting,
Originally posted by Branlor Swiftthanks
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/comic/FF249_03.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/comic/FF249_04.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/comic/FF249_05.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/comic/FF249_11.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/comic/FF249_12.jpg
Originally posted by carver9that clears up the chronology. gladiator did contain most of the blast. your previous posts implied he was the one that generated the starlike explosion near pluto.
The mechanism is what caused the blast.By the time Gladiator left the blast (after containing it), the Skrulls was already on Earth.
They didn't need to survive it because they was on Earth during the time Gladiator flew out of the blast. That's why Gladiator attacked the Fantastic Four, he thought the Skrulls was posing as them.
He didn't hit the ship because again, the Skrulls was on Earth. Why would they have to show it when they quoted what happened during that instance: Gladiator strikes and a Star is born. A couple of scenes after this, Reed views the beam from outer space and states that the blast is being contained but again, by the time all of this happens, the Skrull is on Earth and Gladiator flew 100 times the speed of light to catch up to them (remember, their goal was to kill the fantastic four).
Your asking me to show you Gladiator containing the blast, how about you prove the Skrulls took place in containing said blast.
Originally posted by 753That issue was crazy with Glads feats. And then the next issue shits on him almost entirely...
that clears up the chronology. gladiator did contain most of the blast. your previous posts implied he was the one that generated the starlike explosion near pluto.
Although he did say he's moved worlds. Meh
