Originally posted by quanchi112
Different timelines you tool. Different experiences mean different versions of the character. Your ignorance is truly sickening.
Boy, Khan sure did get owned there...
What happened to him quanchi? Looks like Mr Khan got some meat burned off of his face...
Lets look at it again so we can be sure... 🙂
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderAnother worthless post not relevant to Kelvin Khan. You aren't educated enough to go into Trek threads apparently.
Boy, Khan sure did get owned there...What happened to him quanchi? Looks like Mr Khan got some meat burned off of his face...
Lets look at it again so we can be sure... 🙂
Originally posted by SurturSaying someone has better feats is perception not reality. You obviously don't know their fervency between an objective fact and subjective perception.
Actually no saying reality isn't silly. It's the reality of the situation: which is one character has better feats than the other.What is truly silly is a 150+ page topic about this where only 8 people vote for Khan and you strutting around like you're some Lord of the Land who owned everyone.
My evidence has consistently shown Yoda to be less than capable of dealing with Khan's skills, weapons, and ruthlessness.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Saying someone has better feats is perception not reality. You obviously don't know their fervency between an objective fact and subjective perception.My evidence has consistently shown Yoda to be less than capable of dealing with Khan's skills, weapons, and ruthlessness.
Your only eevidence is that khan has a big gun?
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiThat isn't how debating works. In the Ozy thread WS has more votes but you abandon that ridiculous girly girl mentality just as you abandoned the stationary versus moving point from thread to thread. You're a hypocrite and a dumb one to boot.
You've already conceded this thread, a long time ago. The poll and the arguments have presented and the winner awarded. Yoda wins, and so easily, the poll doesn't even reflect how easy.
You still can't even formulate one sentence outside your baseless claims to correlate your clit ridden points. Khan wins based off the Klingon scene, his skill, and firepower amidst all kinds of stimuli happening at once effectively. Yoda is one little guy. That's it. He gets shot down.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Saying someone has better feats is perception not reality. You obviously don't know their fervency between an objective fact and subjective perception.My evidence has consistently shown Yoda to be less than capable of dealing with Khan's skills, weapons, and ruthlessness.
It can be reality though. Here we can do an example: Superman has better feats than Khan. This is not mere perception, but reality. The reality which is these movies, the reality which is what we see happen in them. It doesn't mean Superman is a real person though. It's definitely not a matter of opinion to say he is more powerful than Khan(and that he has better hair).
But Christ Almighty you and your obsession with words. If you've consistently shown Yoda can't win then why did so many people vote against you?
Let me guess: they are just jealous of you?
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiYou aren't proving he does that before Khan fires. You need evidence not a baseless assumption scripting the entire fight based off your biased and long faced views. You do not debate based off the evidence whereas I have posted Khan reacting and it's faster than Yoda in his fights. Look at the fights not just powers and you imagining things playing out, dumbass.
Incorrect, Yoda wins, and easily. You have ZERO answer for what happens when Yoda TK freezes Khan or immediately TK takes away his rifle. You have zero answer for that. You've conceded about 152 pages ago.