Khan Noonien Singh vs. Yoda

Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't know if he hit anything prior to.

That doesn't answer the question.

Did the blast hit the wall?

Originally posted by The Scenario
That doesn't answer the question.

Did the blast hit the wall?

Khan was fantastic. Yoda... Never liked the stupid gimp.

Khan dies, sadly.

Originally posted by janus77
Khan was fantastic. Yoda... Never liked the stupid gimp.

Khan dies, sadly.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Think about it again. Five minutes. Play it out in your mind. I await your new answer in five to ten minutes. Have some fun.

Originally posted by janus77
Khan dies, badly? 😕
Sadly the mini-green prune-faced one has "The Force", faster reactions and a friggin' lightsabre.

Yoda wins. Deal.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Yoda wins. Deal.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again, I don't know what the blast hit prior to.

Why are you assuming it hit something? Onus is on you to prove that.

So, did the blast hit the wall?

Do phaser blasts even ricochet? 😬

Based on screen feats, no phaser blast has ricocheted off of any target in the movie.

Onus is on quan to prove that they do, if he wants to claim that the phaser hit something prior to.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Why are you assuming it hit something? Onus is on you to prove that.

So, did the blast hit the wall?

Originally posted by XanatosForever
Do phaser blasts even ricochet? 😬

No, they dissipate when they hit a target.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't have to prove anything since you failed to prove your case.

That isn't how it works. I claimed that Khan missed, and I provided evidence in the form of the .gif of Khan's blast hitting a wall. Your only response to direct evidence of one of Khan's blasts hitting a wall has been "what if it hit something else first?"

Thus, your claim, or rather your "case" is this: You claim that before hitting the wall, Khan's blast may have hit some other target first. As such you are required to prove this claim. As well as a few other things.

[list]
[*]Prove that Khan hit something
[*]Prove that phasers ricochet
[*]Provide evidence for both of these
[/list]

If you don't do this, it is you who has failed to prove his case. So what evidence do you actually have that counters mine? Did the blast hit the wall?

Why are we even arguing this? As stated above, phasers don't ricochet, so Quan's entire scenario is nonsensical from the get go.

Originally posted by quanchi112
If he aimed at the ground to knock them on their asses then he is accurate. That's the point, shorty.

Except that never happened, they had just landed from decending from ropes. Khan never caused them to recoil.

Also Quan, This:

Originally posted by The Scenario
That isn't how it works. I claimed that Khan missed, and I provided evidence in the form of the .gif of Khan's blast hitting a wall. Your only response to direct evidence of one of Khan's blasts hitting a wall has been "what if it hit something else first?"

Thus, your claim, or rather your "case" is this: You claim that before hitting the wall, Khan's blast may have hit some other target first. As such you are required to prove this claim. As well as a few other things.

[list]
[*]Prove that Khan hit something
[*]Prove that phasers ricochet
[*]Provide evidence for both of these
[/list]

If you don't do this, it is you who has failed to prove his case. So what evidence do you actually have that counters mine? Did the blast hit the wall?

Answer this, with evidence. You can't, and just like every other abysmal claim you have made, you think you don't require evidence. And aside from Scenario's brilliant reasons, there is one more. It is not up to us to prove the negative. We don't have to prove that the shots Didn't bounce off of anything else, you have to prove that they, in fact Did hit something else. Asking someone to use fallacy reasoning to prove a point is akin to asking you tyo provide ANY evidence, IE: a waste of time. Prove us wrong for once in your miserable existence.

Originally posted by The Scenario
That isn't how it works. I claimed that Khan missed, and I provided evidence in the form of the .gif of Khan's blast hitting a wall. Your only response to direct evidence of one of Khan's blasts hitting a wall has been "what if it hit something else first?"

Thus, your claim, or rather your "case" is this: You claim that before hitting the wall, Khan's blast may have hit some other target first. As such you are required to prove this claim. As well as a few other things.

[list]
[*]Prove that Khan hit something
[*]Prove that phasers ricochet
[*]Provide evidence for both of these
[/list]

If you don't do this, it is you who has failed to prove his case. So what evidence do you actually have that counters mine? Did the blast hit the wall?

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Except that never happened, they had just landed from decending from ropes. Khan never caused them to recoil.

Also Quan, This:

Answer this, with evidence. You can't, and just like every other abysmal claim you have made, you think you don't require evidence. And aside from Scenario's brilliant reasons, there is one more. It is not up to us to prove the negative. We don't have to prove that the shots [b]Didn't bounce off of anything else, you have to prove that they, in fact Did hit something else. Asking someone to use fallacy reasoning to prove a point is akin to asking you tyo provide ANY evidence, IE: a waste of time. Prove us wrong for once in your miserable existence. [/B]

Again, if he doesn't have definitive proof it's just speculation, cheerleader.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't have to prove anything since you failed to prove your case.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose