Khan Noonien Singh vs. Yoda

Started by quanchi112201 pages

Originally posted by The Scenario
He stated something we didn't see. Can't prove it either way.

Can't prove it either way.

I learned from the best. (The best is you.)

(You are the best troll)

I have a character verifying what we did see. Maybe you missed the entire scene but I didn't. This is what I have reduced you to.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have a character verifying what we did see. Maybe you missed the entire scene but I didn't. This is what I have reduced you to.

You have a fallible character spouting hyperbole.

Are you ready to be reasonable yet?

I am surprised Quan isn't an internet legend like Chris Crocker or Leeroy Jenkins. Quan trolls unlike anybody I've ever seen on any forum. Even JIA is less of a troll than Quan. JIA!!

JIA is more of a spammer than a debater really.

Originally posted by The Scenario
You have a fallible character spouting hyperbole.

Are you ready to be reasonable yet?

You can think so whereas I understand what I see in the film. I've always been reasonable its you who has went down the lonely trolly road.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I am surprised Quan isn't an internet legend like Chris Crocker or Leeroy Jenkins. Quan trolls unlike anybody I've ever seen on any forum. Even JIA is less of a troll than Quan. JIA!!
Irony since this is trolling. Stick to the topic and control your emotions.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can think so whereas I understand what I see in the film. I've always been reasonable its you who has went down the lonely trolly road.

54 to 2 and I'm supposed to be the lonely one?

Anyway, if you think I'm trolling you obviously haven't been paying attention. I'm simply pointing out to you that your argument is unreasonable and devoid of logic. That's why you have so much trouble countering it when it's used against you.

Fact is, the "Khan hit" and "Khan missed" evidence is exactly the same. We see Khan fire, and then the scene changes to a blast hitting either a Klingon or the ground. Which is why the nonsense argument that "we don't see in between scenes" works against both of them.

You can't claim Khan hit anything without also conceding that he missed a few, is what I'm saying. If you insist that there are too many unknowns to say Khan missed, you're also saying that there are too many unknowns to claim he hit. They're exactly the same.

So do you have an actual answer yet?

Did the blast hit the ground?

Do phaser blasts bounce?

Good luck.

Originally posted by The Scenario
54 to 2 and I'm supposed to be the lonely one?

Anyway, if you think I'm trolling you obviously haven't been paying attention. I'm simply pointing out to you that your argument is unreasonable and devoid of logic. That's why you have so much trouble countering it when it's used against you.

Fact is, the "Khan hit" and "Khan missed" evidence is exactly the same. We see Khan fire, and then the scene changes to a blast hitting either a Klingon or the ground. Which is why the nonsense argument that "we don't see in between scenes" works against both of them.

You can't claim Khan hit anything without also conceding that he missed a few, is what I'm saying. If you insist that there are too many unknowns to say Khan missed, you're also saying that there are too many unknowns to claim he hit. They're exactly the same.

So do you have an actual answer yet?

Did the blast hit the ground?

Do phaser blasts bounce?

Good luck.

We see him hit the Klingons which is backed up by Kirk. What character said Khan never hit anything ? That's the trash you're trying to sell me on. Hilarious.

Again, my answers won't change so continue to ask the same questions to bolster your post count.

Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]We see him hit the Klingons which is backed up by Kirk. What character said Khan never hit anything ? That's the trash you're trying to sell me on. Hilarious.

We also see Khan miss Klingons, which is backed up by the movie itself. Kirk is fallible and giving hyperbole. When did Kirk say Khan hit any Klingons?


Again, my answers won't change so continue to ask the same questions to bolster your post count.

What answers? You've dodged every question thrown your way so far.

Maybe if you actually answer me, I'll stop asking. Until then, though, have fun doing your little dance.

Originally posted by The Scenario
We also see Khan miss Klingons, which is backed up by the movie itself. Kirk is fallible and giving hyperbole. When did Kirk say Khan hit any Klingons?

What answers? You've dodged every question thrown your way so far.

Maybe if you actually answer me, I'll stop asking. Until then, though, have fun doing your little dance.

You're ignoring he clear depiction and Kirk's words along with the Enterprise crew watching him take them out. We see him jump and gun someone down in clear view along with stab another. You're just trolling. Its awful.

I answered you. I can't take you seriously here with the Khan never hit anyone logic when we clearly see it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]You're ignoring he clear depiction and Kirk's words along with the Enterprise crew watching him take them out. We see him jump and gun someone down in clear view along with stab another. You're just trolling. Its awful.

You're ignoring the clear depiction of Khan's blasts hitting the walls and ground. Again, when did Kirk say that Khan hit any Klingons?


I answered you. I can't take you seriously here with the Khan never hit anyone logic when we clearly see it.

Quote your answers please.

Further, that is a strawman. I never said that Khan never hit anyone, you're putting words in my mouth. That's trolling, please stop.

Originally posted by The Scenario
You're ignoring the clear depiction of Khan's blasts hitting the walls and ground. Again, when did Kirk say that Khan hit any Klingons?

Quote your answers please.

Further, that is a strawman. I never said that Khan never hit anyone, you're putting words in my mouth. That's trolling, please stop.

He said he took them out. We see him shorting them. We see him stab one.

You're back pedaling. Great.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He said he took them out. We see him shorting them. We see him stab one.

But where did Kirk say that Khan shot them? As in, Kirk actually saying "khan is pretty cool guy, eh shoots klingons and doesn't afraid of anything."

"Took them out" doesn't mean the same as "shot them," mind.

We also see Khan miss some. He's rather hit or miss like that.


You're back pedaling. Great.

You didn't quote your answers. Get on that, otherwise you're trolling by refusing to debate. Also, if you could stop with the transparent attempts at changing the subject that would be just great, thanks.

Originally posted by The Scenario
But where did Kirk say that Khan shot them? As in, Kirk actually saying "khan is pretty cool guy, eh shoots klingons and doesn't afraid of anything."

"Took them out" doesn't mean the same as "shot them," mind.

We also see Khan miss some. He's rather hit or miss like that.

You didn't quote your answers. Get on that, otherwise you're trolling by refusing to debate. Also, if you could stop with the transparent attempts at changing the subject that would be just great, thanks.

We see him mainly using his guns and actually see him shoot them. What planet are you from ? This is getting to the point of absurdity.

I don't have the patience to dig up your trollish responses. Just concede already. Khan wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]We see him mainly using his guns and actually see him shoot them. What planet are you from ? This is getting to the point of absurdity.

Incorrect. As per your argument, we see Khan fire, and we see blasts hitting things, but we do not see what happens in between. Therefore, there are too many unknown variables to say whether or not Khan hit them either way.

Now you're getting it, do you see how nonsensical your debate strategy is?


I don't have the patience to dig up your trollish responses. Just concede already. Khan wins.

I didn't ask your my responses, I asked for yours. If you don't want to do that, you might also consider actually answering the questions.

Did the blast hit the wall?

Do phaser blasts bounce?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Incorrect. As per your argument, we see Khan fire, and we see blasts hitting things, but we do not see what happens in between. Therefore, there are too many unknown variables to say whether or not Khan hit them either way.

Now you're getting it, do you see how nonsensical your debate strategy is?

I didn't ask your my responses, I asked for yours. If you don't want to do that, you might also consider actually answering the questions.

Did the blast hit the wall?

Do phaser blasts bounce?

We see khan shoot with both him and the isn't ended target in the same scene. Watch the scene.

Already answered the questions. Your humiliation is now complete.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We see khan shoot with both him and the isn't ended target in the same scene. Watch the scene.

We also see Khan shoot with both him and the miss in the same scene. I've watched the scene, are you sure you have?

Do you understand that Khan both hits and misses? The point is that he isn't perfect.


Already answered the questions. Your humiliation is now complete.

What was the answer? I notice you haven't quoted your answer yet.

Did the blast hit the wall?

Do phaser blasts bounce?

If you continue to dodge these questions, I am forced to conclude that you don't have an answer to them and this is your way of conceding the points.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yoda has been hit by Palpatine's lightning. Boom.

Which is not a weapon, but a power. Not to mention it never actually struck Yoda, and Yoda reflected it in a shockwave.

Originally posted by The Scenario
We also see Khan shoot with both him and the miss in the same scene. I've watched the scene, are you sure you have?

Do you understand that Khan both hits and misses? The point is that he isn't perfect.

What was the answer? I notice you haven't quoted your answer yet.

Did the blast hit the wall?

Do phaser blasts bounce?

If you continue to dodge these questions, I am forced to conclude that you don't have an answer to them and this is your way of conceding the points.

I never said he is perfect I said he didn't miss. There is no definitive proof he misses. You said by my same logic Khan never hits anyone despite the fact we see it on screen. That means you're a liar.

Again, it's been answered but keep asking it.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Which is not a weapon, but a power. Not to mention it never actually struck Yoda, and Yoda reflected it in a shockwave.
Watch the movie. Your ignorance disgusts me. The force lightning kos him at the beginning of their fight. Please watch the movie and quit embarrassing yourself.