Zod/Faora Vs Superman/Thor

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor was slow
Avenger's Thor was weaker than Movie Thor IMO

What are the feats of Thor's lightning as far as what it has damaged?

Durability is a wash IMO. Faora wasn't ever damaged and I value being resistance against aircraft bullets and missiles more than what Thor tanked. My reasoning for this is because I view a tank could have taken what Thor received but the tank couldn't have taken those missiles or bullets without holes or serious damage.

Thor also ducked and covered when the plane was shooting Hulk

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor was slow
Avenger's Thor was weaker than Movie Thor IMO

What are the feats of Thor's lightning as far as what it has damaged?

Durability is a wash IMO. Faora wasn't ever damaged and I value being resistance against aircraft bullets and missiles more than what Thor tanked. My reasoning for this is because I view a tank could have taken what Thor received but the tank couldn't have taken those missiles or bullets without holes or serious damage.

Originally posted by juggerman
Thor also ducked and covered when the plane was shooting Hulk

While absolutely true, there's really no reason to believe F-22 cannon fire would **** him up, considering his overall durability.

Er i meant "I'd give it to team 2 more often than not" in my first post. *Shrug*

Must be the Faora boner messing with my mind.

Originally posted by Robtard
While absolutely true, there's really no reason to believe F-22 cannon fire would **** him up, considering his overall durability.

I don't think it would do crazy damage to him but i do think it would hurt him or else why move away?

Man...I will forever hate whedon for having Thor take cover like a little *****.

Villains win again. Faora takes Superman, Zod takes Thor while he's distracted. Then they both gang up on Superman.

Seriously Thor is out of his league. He wouldn't last a minute against Zod.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor was not weaker. Thor's powers took out multiple leviathan ships. Superman rides his coattails to victory.

That's because Thor amped by being on that building. That was plot device lightning.

Originally posted by The Silent Hero
Villains win again. Faora takes Superman, Zod takes Thor while he's distracted. Then they both gang up on Superman.

Seriously Thor is out of his league. He wouldn't last a minute against Zod.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor was slow
Avenger's Thor was weaker than Movie Thor IMO

What are the feats of Thor's lightning as far as what it has damaged?

Durability is a wash IMO. Faora wasn't ever damaged and I value being resistance against aircraft bullets and missiles more than what Thor tanked. My reasoning for this is because I view a tank could have taken what Thor received but the tank couldn't have taken those missiles or bullets without holes or serious damage.

Thor was slow? Thor was ducking and dodging around IM and Hulk's blows. His flight speed is also pretty fast as seen in his first movie. Thor may not have superspeed like Faora, but it looks like he has one of the fastest reflexes among the Avengers.

As for the tank... the tank wouldn't have survived the bi-frost blast nor a punch by Hulk and may not have even survived multiple repulsor blasts from IM.

Feats of Thor's lightning damage: taking out 2 leviathans and a couple other of their small ships in 1 blast. Leveling a whole landscape in Jotunheim.

Faora will give Thor lots of trouble no doubt. Her speed is not something to easily fight off. But I don't see why Thor can't just fly up in the air, raise her in the air with a tornado like he did Destroyer, then bombard her with lightning or hammer strike her into oblivion.

Originally posted by juggerman
I don't think it would do crazy damage to him but i do think it would hurt him or else why move away?

Sure it would hurt him, don't think it would injure him though. Even those shots were hurting Hulk (tiny bit).

Originally posted by h1a8
That's because Thor amped by being on that building. That was plot device lightning.

How can a piece of steel amp lightning? It can redirect lightning or maybe give him wider coverage, but I don't see how that steel post can amp any electrical charge.

People were throwing around that garbage last year to try and diminish Thor's performance and hype Hulk during the Avengers.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor was slow? Thor was ducking and dodging around IM and Hulk's blows. His flight speed is also pretty fast as seen in his first movie. Thor may not have superspeed like Faora, but it looks like he has one of the fastest reflexes among the Avengers.

As for the tank... the tank wouldn't have survived the bi-frost blast nor a punch by Hulk and may not have even survived multiple repulsor blasts from IM.

Feats of Thor's lightning damage: taking out 2 leviathans and a couple other of their small ships in 1 blast. Leveling a whole landscape in Jotunheim.

Faora will give Thor lots of trouble no doubt. Her speed is not something to easily fight off. But I don't see why Thor can't just fly up in the air, raise her in the air with a tornado like he did Destroyer, then bombard her with lightning or hammer strike her into oblivion.

Slow as in relatively slow.
The tank would have some damage but will be fine. A Hulk punch will damage a top tank but it will still be in tact very much. IMO Abram tanks are more durable than leviathans.
Thor amped on a building to take out the Leviathans.

Because Zod isn't going to let him. Or her speed would prevent this.

Originally posted by FrothByte
How can a piece of steel amp lightning? It can redirect lightning or maybe give him wider coverage, but I don't see how that steel post can amp any electrical charge.

Originally posted by h1a8
Slow as in relatively slow.
The tank would have some damage but will be fine. A Hulk punch will damage a top tank but it will still be in tact very much. IMO Abram tanks are more durable than leviathans.
Thor amped on a building to take out the Leviathans.

Because Zod isn't going to let him. Or her speed would prevent this.

At best all the building did was store lightning, thus allowing Thor to fire a longer blast....There is zero indication that it amped the power.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
What leads you to believe Abraham tanks are more durable than leviathans?

Not a lot of things on Earth can damage them (or to the degree of destroying them).

Leviathans were soft on one side (their belly) and thus reduced their overall durability. Plus Hulk was easily stabbing them with weak as metal. Hulk couldn't have penetrated Abrams Tank that way.

Originally posted by Silent Master
At best all the building did was store lightning, thus allowing Thor to fire a longer blast....There is zero indication that it amped the power.

Originally posted by h1a8
Slow as in relatively slow.
The tank would have some damage but will be fine. A Hulk punch will damage a top tank but it will still be in tact very much. IMO Abram tanks are more durable than leviathans.
Thor amped on a building to take out the Leviathans.

Because Zod isn't going to let him. Or her speed would prevent this.

Which is why Iron-man was able to blow up a tank with a single mini-rocket, but needed to fly inside a Leviathan to destroy one.