Originally posted by psycho gundam
Calm down. Just preoccupied with a project, thought I would be done in time but I'm not so bare with me.
----------Ah, Charlotte very well done, I have taught you well 😉
Originally posted by psycho gundam
Both of you: dye in flames
Done.
http://img1.etsystatic.com/007/1/7093670/il_570xN.408166077_3qa6.jpg
Just bear with me.
Maybe not use for judges those who frankly expressed their opinions on the matchup in odds thread? I mean Blair Wind and Ambient placing their bets on Id and me respectively. This way if any of us loses he\she won't be able to b*tch about biased judges.
Something like... Galan\Omega\KM(or Bentley) on my match and Blair\Delph\Ambient on PG\Digi. Sounds like fair lineup with no recycling of "votes of adoration" from previous matches. Galan is also one of the site's resident experts on psionics so he'll be a wonderful judge for our match. But the final decision is still yours, Curry. You are teh bossman here.
Originally posted by Charlotte DeBel
Maybe not use for judges those who frankly expressed their opinions on the matchup in odds thread? I mean Blair Wind and Ambient placing their bets on Id and me respectively. This way if any of us loses he\she won't be able to b*tch about biased judges.
Did I place bets on Id/You? I mentioned that Id had an interesting on panel combo in the beginning of the tournament - but he wasn't the one who I stated had a great plan (one I knew of from the beginning).
I don't really care who I get placed on - I don't play favorites nor do I let bias color my decisions. I mean, I voted for Digi over Leo once 😛
Originally posted by Blair Wind
Did I place bets on Id/You? I mentioned that Id had an interesting on panel combo in the beginning of the tournament - but he wasn't the one who I stated had a great plan (since I knew of it from the beginning).I don't really care who I get placed on - I don't play favorites nor do I let bias color my decisions. I mean, I voted for Digi over Leo once 😛
😐 Yes, you did, probably because I whupped his ass. You're welcome for making your decision so easy. uhuh
Yeah, judges placing "bets" in the odds thread shouldn't influence decisions. Pretty much everyone we have understands that in-match arguments >>>>>>>> initial reactions to amalgams.
Originally posted by Digi
😐 Yes, you did, probably because I whupped his ass. You're welcome for making your decision so easy. uhuhYeah, judges placing "bets" in the odds thread shouldn't influence decisions. Pretty much everyone we have understands that in-match arguments >>>>>>>> initial reactions to amalgams.
Hi all, quick question. anyone have an idea why the exact same links would work in one PM but not another? I redid my write up for chip guy. to do so I copied the old one deleted what I wanted to drop and added my changes. when curry replied saying he had it I checked the links and only the ones I aded with changes worked. I went back into sent messages and none worked on the second message sent but all worked in the first. I'ce checked most and can't see any difference what so ever in how they are written. completely confused.
Most links do a "..." break when they are too long - which is fine as they are still usable because it's referencing a longer link attached to the post. However, if you copy the link with the break (thus not the true url) and then paste it somewhere else that link is broken because it can't reference the longer url it was attached to.
Without knowing more that would be my theory.
