Hancock vs. Zod

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, you brought up him having an invisible aura..that means the burden is on you.

If you like I can quote the post where you made the original claim.

You're contesting the feat based on the idea it could be hers. Prove it was then.

Originally posted by juggerman
You're contesting the feat based on the idea it could be hers. Prove it was then.

Contesting the feat doesn't shift the burden.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Contesting the feat doesn't shift the burden.

You claimed it was hers. Prove it

Originally posted by juggerman
You claimed it was hers. Prove it

Again, you made the original claim, so the burden is still on you.

If it'll help, I can quote the post where you made the original claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, you made the original claim, so the burden is still on you.

If it'll help, I can quote the post where you made the original claim.

So now it wasn't hers?

Originally posted by juggerman
So now it wasn't hers?

You made the original claim, that means the burden is on you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You made the original claim, that means the burden is on you.

Glad you agree it wasn't hers

Originally posted by juggerman
Glad you agree it wasn't hers

You still haven't backed up your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You still haven't backed up your claim.

I did. She was protected when she should have been injured. And of course his aura is a known power in the Superman mythos.

Originally posted by juggerman
I did. She was protected when she should have been injured. And of course his aura is a known power in the Superman mythos.

Comic Superman's mythos isn't proof, as it's not canon to the movie verse.

Now, please back up your claim.

Was there a visual cue? Was there any spoken or documented confirmation that he has his electron invincibility aura?

If there wasn't and you can't produce any proof, then he doesn't have one.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Comic Superman's mythos isn't proof, as it's not canon to the movie verse.

Now, please back up your claim.

Lois not being harmed is proof

Originally posted by KingD19
Was there a visual cue? Was there any spoken or documented confirmation that he has his electron invincibility aura?

If there wasn't and you can't produce any proof, then he doesn't have one.

The scene itself is proof. She should have been injured and wasn't

Originally posted by juggerman
Lois not being harmed is proof

No, it's you making up powers that don't exist in order to explain a scene of PIS.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, it's you making up powers that don't exist in order to explain a scene of PIS.

I made up the idea of Superman having it? I get you don't like it but that's what it looking like

Originally posted by juggerman
I made up the idea of Superman having it? I get you don't like it but that's what it looking like

Yes, you made up the idea of MOS Superman having it.

In the movies there's no proof that he has it. So saying he has it is pretty much making it up when there's no actual proof.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, you made up the idea of MOS Superman having it.

Not Superman in general and it fits

Originally posted by KingD19
In the movies there's no proof that he has it. So saying he has it is pretty much making it up when there's no actual proof.

There is

Originally posted by juggerman
Not Superman in general and it fits

It's a power that you made up for MOS Superman.