Thor Vs Mr. Majestic

Who is stronger between Thor and Majestic?

Probably roughly equals

Slight, slight edge to Thor maybe if forced to pick

Here we go again. Why Thor and Surfer? Why man?

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Probably roughly equals

Slight, slight edge to Thor maybe if forced to pick

Originally posted by carver9
Here we go again. Why Thor and Surfer? Why man?

Majestics is one of the only Herald that has soloed and suceeded at moving a planet. A lot have tried and all have failed. With that said, I would mark Majestics minus Hulk as the strongest Herald.

Edge to Majestic.

The Kang feat jumps to mind, granted it was only half a planet but he accomplished with such apparent ease.

But I'm generally of the opinion that Majestic should always have the better feats of strength, Thor should use his other abilities to accomplish the same task.

Unless he was to lose Mjoinir/some abilities for an extended time

Split but Thor if I had to pick. Both have high end strength showings but Thor's more established and when push comes to shove, has some feats that impress me more. Not talking about stuff like moving planets, although his high end feats are at least on par there as well. Thor's harder to judge than other characters because of how often he uses Mjolnir however. Then again, we never seem to take into account flight with certain Superman-like characters, funny how that works.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Why, if I may ask. Majestic has moved planets. Thor has no feats like that.

You claimed that you never bring up space cheese feats to prove who's stronger unless someone does so first, your own words not too long ago. I find it interesting how you jump from using relative showings to who's lifted more weight from thread to thread.

Originally posted by carver9
Majestics is one of the only Herald that has soloed and suceeded at moving a planet. A lot have tried and all have failed. With that said, I would mark Majestics minus Hulk as the strongest Herald.

Now you stroke majestic? You flip-flop more than zopzop.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
The Kang feat jumps to mind, granted it was only half a planet but he accomplished with such apparent ease.

But I'm generally of the opinion that Majestic should always have the better feats of strength, Thor should use his other abilities to accomplish the same task.

Unless he was to lose Mjoinir/some abilities for an extended time

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Split but Thor if I had to pick. Both have high end strength showings but Thor's more established and when push comes to shove, has some feats that impress me more. Not talking about stuff like moving planets, although his high end feats are at least on par there as well. Thor's harder to judge than other characters because of how often he uses Mjolnir however. Then again, we never seem to take into account flight with certain Superman-like characters, funny how that works.

You claimed that you never bring up space cheese feats to prove who's stronger unless someone does so first, your own words not too long ago. I find it interesting how you jump from using relative showings to who's lifted more weight from thread to thread.

The problem with Majestic is that he has nearly no relative strength feat with an established character from DC, so I had to rely on his space cheese.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Really? What's your reasoning about choosing Thor?

The problem with Majestic is that he has nearly no relative strength feat with an established character from DC, so I had to rely on his space cheese.

I just explained.

Then Majestic has my sympathies but not really our problem is it? Besides, Thor's are better anyways.

Also, there's a definitive pattern as to how you approach a thread when it suits you. Another example: I said Thor was superior in the Wonder Woman thread, and you brought her up moving the Earth with the JLA. I can quote you if you'd like. 🙂

So which is it? Are you a liar, or just inconsistent?

This is an awesome respect thread for Majestic.

http://www.comicvine.com/mr-majestic/4005-21972/forums/mr-majestic-capability-thread-626409/

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I just explained.

Then Majestic has my sympathies but not really our problem is it? Besides, Thor's are better anyways.

Also, there's a definitive pattern as to how you approach a thread when it suits you. Another example: I said Thor was superior in the Wonder Woman thread, and you brought her up moving the Earth with the JLA. I can quote you if you'd like. 🙂

So which is it? Are you a liar, or just inconsistent?

Really? Where was Thor moving a planet or anything comparable without mjolnir?

Incorrect. I brought up relative showings in response to you. I only brought up her helping move earth when people posted about Thor tanking the weight of half a planet.

Neither of the two.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Where?

Really? Where was Thor moving a planet or anything comparable without mjolnir?

Incorrect. I brought up relative showings in response to you. I only brought up her helping move earth when people posted about Thor tanking the weight of half a planet.

Neither of the two.

My very first post.

Lifting the World Engine, overpowering infinite gravity, closing dimensions, producing the force to knock a planet out of orbit with Hercules etc. You know all the feats, and I know you're either going to dismiss them as unquantifiable (As opposed to moving a planet in an undisclosed amount of time) or something similarly silly. Why play this game? Just make your point clear and save us time. God, you're transparent.

Liar, liar, pants on fire (That feat hadn't even been brought up):

Originally posted by abhilegend
Thor wins, clearly noticeably stronger.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Prove it. Any feat rivaling a weakened diana helping to move earth?

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

Now you stroke majestic? You flip-flop more than zopzop.
Half a planet is good but not good enough.
Really? What's your reasoning about choosing Thor? Also mjolnir enhances Thor's striking power, there is no proof that flight enhances Majestic's strength. In comics, flight doesn't add in lifting or pushing as illogical it may seem.

The problem with Majestic is that he has nearly no relative strength feat with an established character from DC, so I had to rely on his space cheese.

I was being sarcastic. 😠

Originally posted by abhilegend
Also mjolnir enhances Thor's striking power, there is no proof that flight enhances Majestic's strength. In comics, flight doesn't add in lifting or pushing as illogical it may seem.

Missed this. Some writers consider Mjolnir to just be a substitute for Thor's strength, even used to measure it such as the time against Gladiator. Just as it's clear that writers don't usually consider flight as an assistant in moving things when even flying. So I'm curious why you're so keen to accept one, but not the other.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
My very first post.

Liar, liar, pants on fire (That feat hadn't even been brought up):

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=580358&pagenumber=3

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Missed this. Some writers consider Mjolnir to just be a substitute for Thor's strength, even used to measure it such as the time against Gladiator. Just as it's clear that writers don't usually consider flight as an assistant in moving things when even flying. So I'm curious why you're so keen to accept one, but not the other.

Originally posted by carver9
I was being sarcastic. 😠

Originally posted by abhilegend
Its not an explanation.

Unquanfifiable, Hyperbole., Unquantifiable., Hyperbole and far less than Majestic moving a planet. You know they are unquantifiable and hyperbolic and still discuss them? What are you talking about? Look who is talking.

You're literally choosing to ignore any feat that doesn't suit you. For example: Thor moves the World Engine, something powered by the World Tree itself, rewinding time itself and it's less impressive then moving a planet because it's unquantifiable? This is why no one takes you seriously.

Anyone can be unreasonable. As far as I'm concerned, all of Majestic's feats are unquantifiable. Especially since you can't prove flight didn't assist in the process.

Originally posted by abhilegend
You honestly block things you don't want to see. Thor and Hercules' "moving" planet was already brought up.

You said:

Originally posted by abhilegend
Thor tanking the weight of half a planet.

Originally posted by abhilegend
No writer has ever portrayed mjolnir that way AFAIK. Your interpretations aside.
Well, I was not.

Not true. I can post scans of Thor putting away Mjolnir and beating the shit out of beings who withstood Mjolnir. Thor literally hit Gladiator with Mjolnir and you know what he said? That Thor's strength is on par with his own:
http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/R-O-O/media/Thor/ThorvsGladiator3.jpg.html
http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/R-O-O/media/Thor/ThorvsGladiator4.jpg.html

So yea, gtfo.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
You're literally choosing to ignore any feat that doesn't suit you.

So yea, gtfo.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Am I? I dismissed that because its not quantifiable. The only given scan of World tree shows its not even as big as earth. Really?

Lawlz.

Yup. The World Tree isn't potent due to it's size, it's the Cosmic Axis of the Multiverse, it holds creation together (Like Atlas does for the Olympians). And Thor did it while weakened. He spun the engine, reversing time and Ragnarok, overpowering the tree's will. Definitely not more impressive then moving a planet because we can't attach a number to it.

Prove it then.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Then I mistook you for someone else. Stuff like that happens.

That proves what exactly? Mjolnir shots have no effects on them? Thor's bare fists>Mjolnir now. Make up your mind. Added striking power of mjolnir was non-existent here, right?

Someday rage, someone might be stupid enough to believe this BS you're spouting. Not today sadly.

Yes, stuff like previous quotes, and what you meant clearly aren't important. Who cares what we proclaim our stance is right? I should just flip flop my stance from thread to thread like you seem to do.

If you think Thor's bare fist > Mjolnir that's your prerogative. I'm simply pointing out that Mjolnir = Thor's fists has been shown to be the case in comics as stupid, illogical, and nonsensical as that may appear. Because, it's comics. You think a strawman will change that?

That's my point, he hit Gladiator with a spinning Mjolnir hit and the writer used it to portray conclusive strength equality, supporting my previous point.

I'd challenge you to a battle zone of Majestic vs. Thor to see how confident you are in a place where you can't troll nonstop but you'd decline.