The Official "Argue with Quan about Zelda" Thread

Started by quanchi11287 pages

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
There's s difference between lift strength and combat strength, but since he tosses the boar by smacking it, thats his combat strength.
Nah, since we see him fail to seriously injure Link with an axe.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't even know if the explosion hit him I might add.

Nah, as we see combat wise and with an axe he failed to outdo his underlings.


We know what caused it did, which makes the feat much greater.

What we see is him hit someone durable, and the durable person not be hurt.

If King Kong hit Link, and Link was unhurt, would King Kong be weak?

Nah, link just turns his skin to diamond when he doesn't want to get hurt.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
We know what caused it did, which makes the feat much greater.

What we see is him hit someone durable, and the durable person not be hurt.

If King Kong hit Link, and Link was unhurt, would King Kong be weak?

We don't know actually.

Nope, since we see his weaker man drum him out. All leads to the same conclusion K. Bulbin has shitty combat strength.

King Kong would kill Link. Link has been ko'd by his weaker underlings.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Nah, link just turns his skin to diamond when he doesn't want to get hurt.
I am sure some of these fanatics believe this.

We see it.

Spider-Man must be weak because he didn't bend lamp posts in highschool. You know, before he has his powers. This is the line of reasoning you're using, it doesn't hold up. K.Bulbin is stronger than Edgington by feats, fact. He, with an axe, could not hurt Link. Fact. This means Russell cannot either. Fact.

If King Kong hit Link, and Link was unhurt, this would mean
1. King Kong is weak
OR
2. Link is durable.

Which is it?

Originally posted by quanchi112
He definitely could but unlike K. Bulbin he didn't strike someone in the face and fail to really injure them.
...but it was the see strike used to knock large beasts around.

And what happened to a character needing combat feats? Kong would in this scenario.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
We see it.

Spider-Man must be weak because he didn't bend lamp posts in highschool. You know, before he has his powers. This is the line of reasoning you're using, it doesn't hold up. K.Bulbin is stronger than Edgington by feats, fact. He, with an axe, could not hurt Link. Fact. This means Russell cannot either. Fact.

If King Kong hit Link, and Link was unhurt, this would mean
1. King Kong is weak
OR
2. Link is durable.

Which is it?

Link doesn't get powers comparable to Spider-Man.

No, as that is lifting strength not combat strength. No, that proves K. Bulbin did not which has nothing to do with Russell.

Link would die unlike weak K. Bulbin hitting him.

Originally posted by BloodRain
...but it was the see strike used to knock large beasts around.

And what happened to a character needing combat feats? Kong would in this scenario.

Yes, he can lift but critically injure he is not that impressive.

Kong would kill Link unlike K. Bulbin.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Link doesn't get powers comparable to Spider-Man.

No, as that is lifting strength not combat strength. No, that proves K. Bulbin did not which has nothing to do with Russell.

Link would die unlike weak K. Bulbin hitting him.


Link is certainly stronger than Spider-Man by feats.

1. There is no 'combat strength', it's a cop out you're using to ignore feats.
2. hitting something with an axe is combat.

Stop dodging the question.

If Kong hit Link and didn't hurt him is it because Kong is weak or Link is durable?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Link is certainly stronger than Spider-Man by feats.

1. There is no 'combat strength', it's a cop out you're using to ignore feats.
2. hitting something with an axe is combat.

Stop dodging the question.

If Kong hit Link and didn't hurt him is it because Kong is weak or Link is durable?

Hahahahahaha, no he isn't.

1. False.
2. Yes, hence how pathetic he is.

Kong kills Link. I refuse to accept him being unhurt since it is ridiculous.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hahahahahaha, no he isn't.

1. False.
2. Yes, hence how pathetic he is.

Kong kills Link. I refuse to accept him being unhurt since it is ridiculous.


Kindly provide a scan of Spider-Man overpowering a class 100 foe.

He hit the boar, combat feat, showing he is stronger than Russell. Herp.

So you refuse to answer the question, because of your bias.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Kindly provide a scan of Spider-Man overpowering a class 100 foe.

He hit the boar, combat feat, showing he is stronger than Russell. Herp.

So you refuse to answer the question, because of your bias.

Spider-Man has beaten Hulk.

Nah, lifting something and failing with an axe to kill or critically injure someone is the stuff of pity.

The premise is flawed and silly.

Failing to injure a durable character isn't a sign of weakness. It just means the other guy is too durable to be hurt by that attack.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Failing to injure a durable character isn't a sign of weakness. It just means the other guy is too durable to be hurt by that attack.
Ko'd by his henchmen. K. Bulbin is stronger than Link but the fact he can't kill him with an axe shot is humiliating.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Spider-Man has beaten Hulk.

Nah, lifting something and failing with an axe to kill or critically injure someone is the stuff of pity.

The premise is flawed and silly.


Show me him overpowering Hulk. And not grey Hulk.

Link is durable, King Bulbin plainly demonstrates class 5+ strength with his axe.

No, you're avoiding it because it forces you to examine your own logic, which is ugly to look at even from a distance.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ko'd by his henchmen. K. Bulbin is stronger than Link but the fact he can't kill him with an axe shot is humiliating.

Stop citing an irrelevant showing. Link didn't have his power when that happened. Play more than 5 minutes of TP please.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Show me him [b]overpowering Hulk. And not grey Hulk.

Link is durable, King Bulbin plainly demonstrates class 5+ strength with his axe.

No, you're avoiding it because it forces you to examine your own logic, which is ugly to look at even from a distance.

Stop citing an irrelevant showing. Link didn't have his power when that happened. Play more than 5 minutes of TP please. [/B]

He beat him. Combat strength. Hulk would rape all of Hyrule combined.

No, he does not. Combat strength is pathetic.

Your logic revolves around ignoring everything and assuming everything.

Canon. Keep ignoring canon events. 🙂

So you have nothing that supports Spider-Man being stronger than Link. Good.

Argue it with the cutscene. Provide a showing for Russell that compares or concede.

Lol'd. You contradicted yourself at the same time as making a thinly veiled insult out of a baseless claim.

It's canon to Link before Link got his power, it is not at all relevant to Link as of even the early game, let alone the end.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you have nothing that supports Spider-Man being stronger than Link. Good.

Argue it with the cutscene. Provide a showing for Russell that compares or concede.

Lol'd. You contradicted yourself at the same time as making a thinly veiled insult out of a baseless claim.

It's canon to Link [b]before Link got his power, it is not at all relevant to Link as of even the early game, let alone the end. [/B]

Beating someone with planetary strength. 😂

Head slap off scene.

Prove Link's musculature changed or his durability. K. Bulbin is weak. That's all.

Base Hulk isn't planetary.
Spider-Man never overpowered Hulk.

Slapping off heads is not better than K.Bulbin's feat, concession accepted.

Link in the beginning of the game demonstrates meh durability. Link by the middle and end demonstrates much greater durability. We are told Link is becoming more powerful in universe, and his feats match this.

Tadah.