The Official "Argue with Quan about Zelda" Thread

Started by TheGodKiller87 pages

Originally posted by Sacred 117
The only thing I find especially wrong with his statement:

Inevitable loss =/= possibility of victory

haermm


You meant to say:
"Inevitable loss == possibility of victory"

*The double equal-to being a reference to the operator used in programming languages.*

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You meant to say:
"Inevitable loss == possibility of victory"

*The double equal-to being a reference to the operator used in programming languages.*

Right. Diffence between the signs?

Originally posted by quanchi112
no, that was just an example. Russell wins but I absolutely outdebated Scenario.

If Russell is stronger and Scenario won you must really suck at debating, since you could not convince a single judge he won despite being more powerful.

If you out debated Scenario, you should have won unless Ganondorf is so much more powerful than Russell that you couldn't win anyway.

If Scenario did not even use the full power of Ganondorf in the thread, as noted by Digi, and still crushed you, as indicated by you getting 0 votes, then he out debated you, and Ganondorf is more powerful.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
If Russell is stronger and Scenario won you must really suck at debating, since you could not convince a single judge he won despite being more powerful.

If you out debated Scenario, you should have won unless Ganondorf is so much more powerful than Russell that you couldn't win anyway.

If Scenario did not even use the full power of Ganondorf in the thread, as noted by Digi, and still crushed you, as indicated by you getting 0 votes, then he out debated you, and Ganondorf is more powerful.

I never said Russell was more powerful. Learn to comprehend before you start to debate.

This isn't always about who is more powerful. Your mind has always struggled with this.

Originally posted by Sacred 117
Right. Diffence between the signs?

One can be interpreted as being not-equal-to, the other is a positive comparison with regards to the equivalent sign.

Just pointing out. /shrugs

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I never did. I said it is possible to outdebate someone and lose theoretically. I have an example. At no point did I compare these to my battlezone. 😂

Yet you won't debate him again? You know, after losing last time?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
If Russell is stronger and Scenario won you must really suck at debating, since you could not convince a single judge he won despite being more powerful.

If you out debated Scenario, you should have won unless Ganondorf is so much more powerful than Russell that you couldn't win anyway.

If Scenario did not even use the full power of Ganondorf in the thread, as noted by Digi, and still crushed you, as indicated by you getting 0 votes, then he out debated you, and Ganondorf is more powerful.

Russell is more formidable. Everything has to center around who is more powerful to your small world.

I maximized my character more. 🙂

If Russell is more formidable, then you should have been able to win by using more of his capability than Scenario used of Ganon's. You didn't.

What went wrong?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
If Russell is more formidable, then you should have been able to win by using more of his capability than Scenario used of Ganon's. You didn't.

What went wrong?

I can't convince everyone but he realized I outdebated him. I'm fine with that.

Then you failed as a debater? It was your personal inability to convince the judges you were correct that cost you the battlezone?

What a mature thing to admit.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Then you failed as a debater? It was your personal inability to convince the judges you were correct that cost you the battlezone?

What a mature thing to admit.

I outdebated him. Again, I'm fine with that. You should accept it as well.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Im the greatest debater you'll ever see in your insignificant life.

I've never seen you. And I have no plans to. So unless you have some plan to come and see me, this statement of yours is false.

Hey look at that, I just out debated you! That wasn't so hard.

This thread promises to produce gems.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I've never seen you. And I have no plans to. So unless you have some plan to come and see me, this statement of yours is false.

Hey look at that, I just out debated you! That wasn't so hard.

An expression in which you've seen my debating first hand. You've felt the wrath, nerd.

The wrath of a stubborn little guy on the internet that is incapable of coming to grips with the fact that he lost a debate? Hm.

Why did you lose that debate, anyway?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The wrath of a stubborn little guy on the internet that is incapable of coming to grips with the fact that he lost a debate? Hm.

Why did you lose that debate, anyway?

I outdebated him. Move on. This has to hurt scenario every time he reads these responses.

I don't think The Scenario is all too wounded by your psychological trauma.

Why can't you talk about what happened? I can't unrape you, but talking might feel better.

I outdebated him. Move on. This has to hurt scenario every time he reads these responses.

My heart hurts when I read lies.

Originally posted by The Scenario
My heart hurts when I read lies.
So what did it do when you posted the khan lies ? You're in denial with regards to the debate.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I don't think The Scenario is all too wounded by your psychological trauma.

Why can't you talk about what happened? I can't unrape you, but talking might feel better.

I maximized my character more. Per judges lips.