Superman vs A Planet

Started by Villelater13 pages

I saw Superman sweat while moving Earth a very small distance...if a planet was thrown at him well...its going to hurt if he just stands there

All heralds would be hurt by planets being thrown at them.

Superman has many feats far above destroying a planet with a punch. Using those feats then of course Superman can do it.

/thread.

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman has many feats far above destroying a planet with a punch. Using those feats then of course Superman can do it.

/thread.

What fts?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Omg. Reading incomprehension for the loss. It was a quick flashback which renewed Kal-L's determination to do even better than what Kal-El did in his life.

Laughable excuse? Wtf?!!? Again u are purposely trying to be obtuse? All this swapping of memories were in chronological order. It was all part of the "This Is Your Life" story arc which ran through a. Superman #26, b. Action Comics #836, and c. Adventures of Superman #649 consecutively. Like I said, it went into detail of what was happening in Infinite Crisis #5 when both Supermen came to blows in the uninhabited Metropolis of earth 2. They even had a collected trade paperback titled "Superman: Infinite Crisis" that collected those 3 books plus Infinite Crisis #5.

Seriously man... Concede the point. U are going down like a house of cards. Save face... Please.

Jake where are you? I think the House of El really does need you now.


Which showed that Lois was hurt and not dead like in IC 5. In IC 5 he was accusing superman of killing her and in those issues he was accusing him of hurting her. Next you will tell me that hurt=dead, right?

Infinite crisis 5 wasn't a part of "This is your life". There was no memory swapping, no "world shattering punches", lois lane was dead and its a different fight under a different writer.

I can tell how desperate you are at this point. Lulz.

So when the writer says "worlds shatter" for both Thor and Superman. It's literal for Thor but hyperbole for Superman? A lot of fair minded and unbiased fans here I see.

I haven't read the Thor: God of Thunder but from what you guys are saying, it looks interesting. I'll pick it up. Question, Of the three Thor's, which Thor hits Gorr with planet busting blows?

I believe it was current Thor. And it's literal for both of them.

It was current Thor, and by narration and art alike, he was indeed shattering the planet he was fighting Gorr on in addition to damaging a distant moon with the force of his blows.

Originally posted by Diesldude
So when the writer says "worlds shatter" for both Thor and Superman. It's literal for Thor but hyperbole for Superman? A lot of fair minded and unbiased fans here I see.

You're kind of directing this at the wrong people.

Who are these "a lot"?

Originally posted by Diesldude
So when the writer says "worlds shatter" for both Thor and Superman. It's literal for Thor but hyperbole for Superman? A lot of fair minded and unbiased fans here I see.

Six times in three comics saying the same thing are obviously hyperboles.

Statements are hyperbole. A total of times doesn't take away from this. If you can't accept one statement, you shouldn't accept the other...hypocrite.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
It was current Thor, and by narration and art alike, he was indeed shattering the planet he was fighting Gorr on in addition to damaging a distant moon with the force of his blows.
They were fighting on a planet that was shattering. Was it shown shattered? Honest questions because I haven't read this arc yet.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Who are these "a lot"?

fair minded and unbiased fans..

Originally posted by abhilegend
Six times in three comics saying the same thing are obviously hyperboles.
I know right, it's not like the 2 superman haven't ran into each other afterwards in a non physical confrontation and nothing of this sort happened. These 2 supermen were going all out and they were destroying time, space and the planet.

If the conditions played into their feat, Iirc there were other duplicates that met but did not have the same type of results.

Originally posted by carver9
Statements are hyperbole. A total of times doesn't take away from this. If you can't accept one statement, you shouldn't accept the other...hypocrite.

I accepted the statement in Thor's feat. I don't know why you are so bitter.
Originally posted by Diesldude
I know right, it's not like the 2 superman haven't ran into each other afterwards in a non physical confrontation and nothing of this sort happened. These 2 supermen were going all out and they were destroying time, space and the planet.

If the conditions played into their feat, Iirc there were other duplicates that met but did not have the same type of results.


Yup. They even spell it out how the world was destroyed "Who can strike with such force they shatter-", "Our blows have destroyed the boundaries of space-time" and all that. If anybody else like Thor had said those words and somebody said that this isn't planet shattering, we would've seen a shitstorm like never seen before. Its superman so it must've been hyperbole though.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I accepted the statement in Thor's feat. I don't know why you are so bitter.
Yup. They even spell it out how the world was destroyed "Who can strike with such force they shatter-", "Our blows have destroyed the boundaries of space-time" and all that. If anybody else like Thor had said those words and somebody said that this isn't planet shattering, we would've seen a shitstorm like never seen before. Its superman so it must've been hyperbole though.
Its hyperbole when we know what really happened. You are trying to sell YOUR version of a feat,but people who know better are not buying.

Originally posted by JBL
Its hyperbole when we know what really happened. You are trying to sell YOUR version of a feat,but people who know better are not buying.

You can repeat a million times more and it would still change nothing.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Which showed that Lois was hurt and not dead like in IC 5. In IC 5 he was accusing superman of killing her and in those issues he was accusing him of hurting her. Next you will tell me that hurt=dead, right?

Infinite crisis 5 wasn't a part of "This is your life". There was no memory swapping, no "world shattering punches", lois lane was dead and its a different fight under a different writer.

I can tell how desperate you are at this point. Lulz.


I just explained it to you. Do I have to hold ure hand for everything? It's the same damned fight. Now ure just in full denial.
Originally posted by Diesldude
I know right, it's not like the 2 superman haven't ran into each other afterwards in a non physical confrontation and nothing of this sort happened. These 2 supermen were going all out and they were destroying time, space and the planet.

If the conditions played into their feat, Iirc there were other duplicates that met but did not have the same type of results.


Easily explained as u will soon see. Believe me if you reread the whole thing, things will be so much clearer.
Originally posted by abhilegend
I accepted the statement in Thor's feat. I don't know why you are so bitter.
Yup. They even spell it out how the world was destroyed "Who can strike with such force they shatter-", "Our blows have destroyed the boundaries of space-time" and all that. If anybody else like Thor had said those words and somebody said that this isn't planet shattering, we would've seen a shitstorm like never seen before. Its superman so it must've been hyperbole though.

Yes. That same thing about counterparts was brought up in the other thread that I originally posted. Other than the whole place being in flux due to Alexander Luthor, he made it quite clear that he needed Kal-L. For some reason he couldn't explain, he was very essential to his plans. It's as if Luthor believed that Kal had a strong effect on the multiverse. Hence the side effects of anything wonky that happens surrounding him. How do you not know this?

And for the lulz... You keep asking for proof that the whole area was in flux, well here you go. I can't believe I even had to post this since it's plainly obvious what the whole flarkin story was about from the get go. In Kal-L's own mouth, "The multiverse is unstable".