Originally posted by Inhuman
I dont see what the issue others see in your post. There is validity to your concerns regarding his opinion towards his good friend.
thanks...
Originally posted by Zack M
Chris Pine close to play Steve Trevor.http://www.thewrap.com/chris-pine-closes-deal-to-star-opposite-gal-gadot-in-wonder-woman-exclusive/
pine is a good actor while gadot cant act her way out of a doggy bag so its clearly understandable why pine was hired..
Originally posted by Darth Thor
I mean that's subjective. A lot of people would prefer a more athletic and less beefy Batman.As for the costume, that's all down to Snyder and the direction of the movie, and Not Affleck's acting.
In terms of the acting, I liked Bale because he just seemed so messed up in the head. But hey we've hardly seen any of Affleck yet, and I've liked what we've seen so far. But defo too early to call him the best.
good points
Originally posted by Zack M
Affleck ' s Batman looks the most intimidating. 👆 and looking back at some of the older posts, there were several people who doubted Ben. Now they're jumping on the bandwagon. 😂
Yeah I'm one of them. What wrong with that?
Because when he was first cast all I was thinking was Daredevil. We don't all just have Blind Faith. Sometimes people have to show us something first.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah I'm one of them. What wrong with that?Because when he was first cast all I was thinking was Daredevil. We don't all just have Blind Faith. Sometimes people have to show us something first.
He did show off some acting chops in Argo and The Town. Daredevil was years ago. Actors evolve too.
Warner Bros. are taking a very different approach to their Cinematic Universe (or "Extended Universe" as they're calling it) than Marvel, with Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Justice League introducing the heroes before their origin stories are presumably told in solo outings which are going to follow those movies. It all begins with Batman v Superman next year though. "What we are doing is ground up all the way. It is one giant story," director Zack Snyder explains. "The first thing we had was the Justice League concept. The other movies, in a way, have to support that. That is our Wonder Woman, our Aquaman. They have their own creative concepts that supports them, but they do serve Justice League in the coming together of those heroes."_That won't restrict those in charge of the other heroes too much as the director goes on to explain that the other filmmakers contributing to the DC Extended Universe will have complete creative freedom, albeit with him keeping a very close eye on them. "I want all the other directors of the other films to be able to stretch their legs and do what they want, but at the same time there is a big interconnected universe. I have given everyone amazing access to our story, to me, and what we are doing. All the films have like minded conceptual jumping on points." Snyder wasn't willing to get into specifics, but he did tease what the magazine describes as an "elusive" cameo for Aquaman in Dawn of Justice by promising only that, "You will understand he exists."_
Now, many fans have accused Warner Bros. of not having any sort of plan, but the magazine was lucky enough to see a board which maps out how and where the movies take place in the DC Extended Universe and how they all link up to wach other. Producer Deborah Snyder describes that as, "Kind of a timeline of what every movie is, where it is going, and where the films fit in relation to each other." Fellow producer Charles Roven meanwhile went into even further details about how they're ensuring that these movies all exist in the same world while not restricting their directors and writers too much. "We call it the sandbox. It has borders around it, but everybody gets to play in the sandbox. On Suicide Squad, David Ayer has a lot of specific control over his area of the sandbox. Even if he crosses the line a little bit, we see if we can push our boundaries back a little bit." With Justice League set to start shooting next Spring, expect to hear more soon!
^ Whose keeping a close eye on them? Snyder? Is he the Feige here?
Originally posted by Zack M
He did show off some acting chops in Argo and The Town. Daredevil was years ago. Actors evolve too.
I hadn't seen them at the time.
You can't blame people for being critical. And then blaming them again when they see him in action and say he looks good.
That's not Bandwagoning. Because we were all Hoping he'd be good from Day 1 as it's a character we all love.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Whose keeping a close eye on them? Snyder? Is he the Feige here?I hadn't seen them at the time.
You can't blame people for being critical. And then blaming them again when they see him in action and say he looks good.
That's not Bandwagoning. Because we were all Hoping he'd be good from Day 1 as it's a character we all love.
Yeah, it still a possibility that he could be horrible, but people shouldn't judge him without seeing his stuff first. Plus, it'd not like the Town or Argo are his only good movies.
Originally posted by Zack M
So, some reports are saying Pine is GL not Steve Trevor. Please be true
facepalm have links to these alleged reports???? or is this bullshiite on your part....
Originally posted by Inhuman
So if you dont want him to be Trevor then who will carry the WW film? Certainly not Gal Gadot's acting.
Does she still speak broken english?
Im sure Pine is Steve Trevor.. WB can't be that dumb can they to not have him opposite someone whose english no one can understand yet alone cannot act..
Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Whose keeping a close eye on them? Snyder? Is he the Feige here?I hadn't seen them at the time.
You can't blame people for being critical. And then blaming them again when they see him in action and say he looks good.
That's not Bandwagoning. Because we were all Hoping he'd be good from Day 1 as it's a character we all love.
good points..
Originally posted by Firefly218
Affleck wasn't that great acting wise in Argo. I still haven't seen The Town but I do hear he was good in it.
The Town was crap.. his boston accent was an atrocity to real bostonians
Originally posted by Zack M
Yeah, it still a possibility that he could be horrible, but people shouldn't judge him without seeing his stuff first. Plus, it'd not like the Town or Argo are his only good movies.
Honestly if we never saw him play a superhero before it would have been different. But since he did play Daredevil (a long time ago, yes, but it's not like he was a kid at the time), in a portrayal kind of similar to Batman, we all felt like we have seen what he's capable of in such a role.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Honestly if we never saw him play a superhero before it would have been different. But since he did play Daredevil (a long time ago, yes, but it's not like he was a kid at the time), in a portrayal kind of similar to Batman, we all felt like we have seen what he's capable of in such a role.
Going by the comic con trailer which looked way better on an IMAX 3D screen , Batman should be in great hands but will reserve final judgment next march
Originally posted by Zack Fair
I don't think we should base Afflek's portrayal based on his performance on DD. That was a long time ago under a different director, company and mindset. Not to mention comic book movies are serious business now.
I'm not now. I'm saying DD is what came to mind when I first heard he was cast.