Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Started by Zack M638 pages

Originally posted by Inhuman
So the conspiracy theores talk is going start earlier than I though.

Here are other sites you can blame are payed off and suspicion is afoot as well

http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/03/22/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice-review?watch

http://www.metacritic.com/movie/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice?ref=hp

Guess the whole internet is in on this barker

I will judge for myself soon. And at least try to enjoy the Batman parts.

So, you're saying all the people who have been praising this are wrong? 😕

Originally posted by Zack M
So, you're saying all the people who have been praising this are wrong? 😕

So you're saying all the review sites are wrong? 😕

Ill judge for myself soon enough 👆

Originally posted by Inhuman
So the conspiracy theores talk is going start earlier than I though.

Here are other sites you can blame are payed off and suspicion is afoot as well

http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/03/22/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice-review?watch

http://www.metacritic.com/movie/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice?ref=hp

Guess the whole internet is in on this barker

I will judge for myself soon. And at least try to enjoy the Batman parts.


facepalm

I don't necessarily disagree but I do think the reviewers are set in mind.

The fact that the movie needs to be weighed down on how good it is compared to marvel movies is heavily showing in the reviews.

Where there is no such bias (like here in India) the movie is getting generally positive reviews. Not great and there are genuine flaws like editing, pacing and shit like that.

But I doubt its going to be worse than Furious 7. Or Superman Returns.

As expected Golgo is in full denial/defense mode after years of constant praise-spamming this thread. I predicted a rotten tomatoes score of about 68%. It doesn't look like it's gonna make it that high.

And as expected, you are in the same position as bashing him and the movie before it even comes out.

Chill, you can find out if the movie is good or bad by yourself in two days.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
I'm probably more inclined to believe this. WB's been responsible for a lot of shitty things, even partly so for how Batman & Robin turned out as a movie, etc, but it's always the directors or something else that takes most of the heat no matter what WB does or tells them to do.

Not that I'm defending Synder if this film does in fact suck.

If it sucks, part of it will definitely be down to him. He's really good at action and visuals, but without a good script, you could throw feces at the wall and make a better movie than him.

======

And yeah, it can't be worse than Superman Returns.

Originally posted by abhilegend
And as expected, you are in the same position as bashing him and the movie before it even comes out.

Chill, you can find out if the movie is good or bad by yourself in two days.

Hey, I'm just rubbing the reviews in his face because he's been showering this thread with fluff forever. He calls me an idiot. I get to respond.
Originally posted by -Pr-

And yeah, it can't be worse than Superman Returns.
Yah, I was SO disappointed with that movie. I wanted it to be good, like the first 2 Donner films.

Originally posted by abhilegend
facepalm

I don't necessarily disagree but I do think the reviewers are set in mind.

The fact that the movie needs to be weighed down on how good it is compared to marvel movies is heavily showing in the reviews.

Where there is no such bias (like here in India) the movie is getting generally positive reviews. Not great and there are genuine flaws like editing, pacing and shit like that.

But I doubt its going to be worse than Furious 7. Or Superman Returns.

I don't know or care how good it will be nor will I read the reviews but IGN reviewers are complete dogshit. As are most of those videogame sites pretending to be legit.

Whether they're right or wrong, it doesn't change the fact that they're snakes who bump up scores or down them depending how much the movie/company pays them. You know a site is non partial when it has a game plastered everywhere in ads and then that game happens to get a 10/10. Not to mention IGN was on a steep steep decline when I deleted the app at least half a year ago. I can't imagine how bad they are now.

Originally posted by abhilegend
facepalm

I don't necessarily disagree but I do think the reviewers are set in mind.

The fact that the movie needs to be weighed down on how good it is compared to marvel movies is heavily showing in the reviews.

Where there is no such bias (like here in India) the movie is getting generally positive reviews. Not great and there are genuine flaws like editing, pacing and shit like that.

But I doubt its going to be worse than Furious 7. Or Superman Returns.

Do you agree that Snyder is the problem and needs to be fired ASAP if the DCU is to survive?

Originally posted by One Big Mob
I don't know or care how good it will be nor will I read the reviews but IGN reviewers are complete dogshit. As are most of those videogame sites pretending to be legit.

Whether they're right or wrong, it doesn't change the fact that they're snakes who bump up scores or down them depending how much the movie/company pays them. You know a site is non partial when it has a game plastered everywhere in ads and then that game happens to get a 10/10. Not to mention IGN was on a steep steep decline when I deleted the app at least half a year ago. I can't imagine how bad they are now.

Speak for yourself. Also, if IGN is shit then why should their reviews even bother you? Fact of the matter is they are a big site that commands attention when they review stuff.

I'm not saying you should not watch the movie because IGN only gave it a 6.8. But it at least gives you a head's up of what to expect going in. I found it to be quite enlightening.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Hey, I'm just rubbing the reviews in his face because he's been showering this thread with fluff forever. He calls me an idiot. I get to respond. Yah, I was SO disappointed with that movie. I wanted it to be good, like the first 2 Donner films.

No need to get in his face like this though. If the movie turns out to be bad, its enough punishment for him as it is.
Originally posted by One Big Mob
I don't know or care how good it will be nor will I read the reviews but IGN reviewers are complete dogshit. As are most of those videogame sites pretending to be legit.

Whether they're right or wrong, it doesn't change the fact that they're snakes who bump up scores or down them depending how much the movie/company pays them. You know a site is non partial when it has a game plastered everywhere in ads and then that game happens to get a 10/10. Not to mention IGN was on a steep steep decline when I deleted the app at least half a year ago. I can't imagine how bad they are now.


Yeah, I don't give a damn about what critics say about at this point.

Especially sites like IGN or CBR.

Originally posted by Inhuman
Do you agree that Snyder is the problem and needs to be fired ASAP if the DCU is to survive?

Absolutely. They need to get a director who actually likes these characters.

It...it actually dropped a little.

It's at 38% now.

At this point I don't see it even reaching 50.

Originally posted by Inhuman
So you're saying all the review sites are wrong? 😕

Ill judge for myself soon enough 👆

The majority of the critics doesn't always match what the GA likes. It wouldn't be the first time.

Are we keeping score?

Those who live by RT scores are pathetic af lmao

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Speak for yourself. Also, if IGN is shit then why should their reviews even bother you? Fact of the matter is they are a big site that commands attention when they review stuff.

I'm not saying you should not watch the movie because IGN only gave it a 6.8. But it at least gives you a head's up of what to expect going in. I found it to be quite enlightening.

I always speak for myself. Sometimes I'm writing a response about something and then I have to ask myself if this is for myself, then I say yes and hit submit.

It doesn't bother me anymore. It bothered me to a point where I deleted the app and don't go to the site anymore though. Also did you just ask why something that's shit would bother someone? Is that rhetorical?

And IGN is complete horseshit. You want to explain to me how Bioshock Infinite gets a 10 while surprisingly the whole site is plastered with ads about it? You want to tell me how they can put people on reviews who outright mention they don't play the other games or even like it? How people will lie in reviews and then edit out lies when caught? How they were bumping old reviews to try and get traffic? How they started docking scores based on personal differences? Etc.

I'm not saying this movie will be good. I'm saying that IGN is as trustworthy as my penis in a ladies lockeroom. You know it's going to get hard, why are you even putting it in this situation?

Originally posted by Based
Those who live by RT scores are pathetic af lmao

👆

Why not check the movie yourself like after a week or such? You can get a general consensus about whether the movie is good or not at that point.

Some more reviews from India.

http://www.businessinsider.in/REVIEW-Batman-v-Superman-is-an-impressive-start-to-a-new-superhero-movie-franchise-and-Wonder-Woman-steals-it/articleshow/51520711.cms

mmm

I decided to do a test. I went to IGN to see if there were BvS ads. I did not see any. I don't know if it's slow loading or different ads or what but that shit is usually the screen.

What that means is that BvS didn't pay IGN for ad space. Hence IGN which wouldn't be the first time had sour grapes about it. So it makes sense for it to have a low score.

Again, not saying the movie is good, nor will I find out for many months, but that's a likely explanation.