bump
Originally posted by marwash22
-The film picks up seven years after the events of The Dark Knight Rises. Batman has retired to rebuild Gotham as Bruce Wayne.-During this time, knowing that crime needs to be dealt with, Bruce Wayne has launched a bunch of BatDrones & BatAndroids (BatArmy). Wayne becomes one of the most influential men on the planet due to his rebuilding agenda in Gotham, and the rise of Wayne Enterprises.
-Gotham City is basically led by Bruce Wayne & Wayne Enterprises by day and his BatArmy by night and he has to manage both sides. Speculations indicate that Wayne is an ally of Batman. He admits that he has been 'financing' the Batman but states that he has never actually met the masked crusader. He argues that Batman is making Gotham City a safer place. This is, of course, the general consensus in the populace.
-Wayne is concerned by the events that took place in Man of Steel. Bane's terror in Gotham is still fresh in his memory and the reconstruction of Gotham is not completely done. Everyone saw what the 'alien' (Superman) is capable of. Wayne considers Superman a threat and decides to research every single details there is to know about the visitor from Krypton.
-Bruce Wayne wants to get involved with the reconstruction of Metropolis. This means that Wayne Enterprises and LexCorp have to work together. It is a prospect Wayne is not too thrilled about but goes ahead as it's for the greater good.
If it's the truth then I guess Batman needs to have a sort of background storyline...afterall he's being introduced in a sequel to Superman & Nolan's trilogy is still fresh in the general audience's minds.
However, the mention of the BatArmy does bring Kingdom Come more to mind than Nolan's influence.
I mean, like the premise or not, it's the safest plot that Hollywood seems to go for these days.
I personally think being part of the Nolan verse would be the best thing at this stage. I mean let's face it WB/DC has not had many hits, so just wiping out their biggest franchise out of existence and starting a clean slate makes little sense, especially with that much needed build up to a JL movie.
With that being said, I don't believe these rumors at all. Goyer made it clear in an interview a few months back that this would not be the Nolan Batman. Plus if that was the plan then they would have tried to get Bale back, but they clearly didn't.
Originally posted by marwash22
-The film picks up seven years after the events of The Dark Knight Rises. Batman has retired to rebuild Gotham as Bruce Wayne.-During this time, knowing that crime needs to be dealt with, Bruce Wayne has launched a bunch of BatDrones & BatAndroids (BatArmy). Wayne becomes one of the most influential men on the planet due to his rebuilding agenda in Gotham, and the rise of Wayne Enterprises.
-Gotham City is basically led by Bruce Wayne & Wayne Enterprises by day and his BatArmy by night and he has to manage both sides. Speculations indicate that Wayne is an ally of Batman. He admits that he has been 'financing' the Batman but states that he has never actually met the masked crusader. He argues that Batman is making Gotham City a safer place. This is, of course, the general consensus in the populace.
-Wayne is concerned by the events that took place in Man of Steel. Bane's terror in Gotham is still fresh in his memory and the reconstruction of Gotham is not completely done. Everyone saw what the 'alien' (Superman) is capable of. Wayne considers Superman a threat and decides to research every single details there is to know about the visitor from Krypton.
-Bruce Wayne wants to get involved with the reconstruction of Metropolis. This means that Wayne Enterprises and LexCorp have to work together. It is a prospect Wayne is not too thrilled about but goes ahead as it's for the greater good.
so.. this is the best that an oscar winning screenwriter can deliver 😆 😆 😆 horrible , just simply horrible
Originally posted by Firefly218
Thor part 1 maybe
As opinions go, I beg to differ.
I always thought Thor suffered because he spent half the movie without his powers.
That story line might've worked better in a sequel but being his first solo movie...it did feel like a lame way to introduce a "Godlike superhero".
Originally posted by marwash22
Hancock?what do you mean by "conventional"?
Yeah Hancock didn't follow the norm...but it did get predictable towards the end.
Kickass is another good example.
I guess when I say "conventional" is the fact that Goyer's written alot of superhero/action story lines that's been a proven formula to Hollywood blockbuster standards...whether it's been hit or miss.