Originally posted by Firefly218
Joss Whedon wanted to put Spider-Man and Captain Marvel in the moviehttp://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/markcassidycbm/news/?a=120083#.VUgVxTvjrkI.twitter
Spider-Man would have been awesome.
Originally posted by Galan007When he first emerged, Vision mentioned he had no desire to kill Ultron. I think he contained him. That ruined husk honestly posed no threat to Vision, so why destroy him if he doesn't have to? Maybe trap him in a decapitated Ultron head, like in the comics, as he tries to teach him to appreciate humanity. And so I think he'll be Vision's ace-in-the-hole in the future to derail Thanos' machinations since he's incredibly powerful A.I.
Please share.
It's probably just wishful thinking. Because I was surprised by how much I liked Ultron's personality. I thought he'd just be menacing, all-humans-must-die, beep-boop, robot. Like a Michael Bay Megatron waste of CGI. But his scenes with Ulysses Klaw and Stark were great. And at the end especially, trapped in that ruined shell, I was definitely pitying him.
It'd be a shame to be rid of him forever. Although I also realize I really want Loki to serve the same role when Thanos rolls around. So my theories would call for redundant plot twists. I kinda want Ultron back though more than Loki. Something I'd never thought I'd want. I hated the idea of Ultron being the follow-up to Loki in the first place when first announced. Needless to say, I was completely wrong.
Yeah, when Vision encountered that last broken shell of Ultron, I thought: "Hmm, Ultron's definitely not dead... The camera panned away just as Vision zapped him."
I like the idea of saving a piece of Ultron as a haxx plot-device to be used in the future. The only potential problem there is that Ultron controls what he corrupts. So unless he's 100% good(don't see that happening), unleashing him has the potential to turn a shitty situation into an even shittier situation. /shrug
[edit]
I also like that AoU finally depicted all of the infinity stones in their gem-like states, as two more gems were shown to exist within the Tesseract and Aether, respectively.
Originally posted by ODGif not Ultron, who did you want?
When he first emerged, Vision mentioned he had no desire to kill Ultron. I think he contained him. That ruined husk honestly posed no threat to Vision, so why destroy him if he doesn't have to? Maybe trap him in a decapitated Ultron head, like in the comics, as he tries to teach him to appreciate humanity. And so I think he'll be Vision's ace-in-the-hole in the future to derail Thanos' machinations since he's incredibly powerful A.I.It's probably just wishful thinking. Because I was surprised by how much I liked Ultron's personality. I thought he'd just be menacing, all-humans-must-die, beep-boop, robot. Like a Michael Bay Megatron waste of CGI. But his scenes with Ulysses Klaw and Stark were great. And at the end especially, trapped in that ruined shell, I was definitely pitying him.
It'd be a shame to be rid of him forever. Although I also realize I really want Loki to serve the same role when Thanos rolls around. So my theories would call for redundant plot twists. I kinda want Ultron back though more than Loki. Something I'd never thought I'd want. I hated the idea of Ultron being the follow-up to Loki in the first place when first announced. Needless to say, I was completely wrong.
I think my prediction from years back will come to pass...
That Loki will replace Mephisto's part at Thanos's side in the infinity gauntlet arc.
Loyal servant/adviser at his side but secretly scheming to take the gauntlet for himself.
What im curious about is if they will use Nebula the same way as in the comics.
>Spoiler Warning<
Not sure why you would be in the thread if you haven't seen the movie but whatever.
///
Do you think the death of QS and the fact Fox isn't using Wanda was the eventual deal that Disney & Fox came to? It seems like way too much of a coincidence to not be true, but this is pure speculation on my part.
Thoughts?
Originally posted by Henry_Pym
>Spoiler Warning<Not sure why you would be in the thread if you haven't seen the movie but whatever.
///
Do you think the death of QS and the fact Fox isn't using Wanda was the eventual deal that Disney & Fox came to? It seems like way too much of a coincidence to not be true, but this is pure speculation on my part.Thoughts?
Good theory , but I think QS will be back. I think i read a while back A.T Johnson signed for multiple movies. Maybe they bring him back with that tech that patched up hawkeye. If not then another way via infinity stones shenanigans.
Originally posted by Galan007
I'm more curious if Thanos will also be shown conquering the abstracts, like he did in the comics. If so, Marvel had better start introducing them in the films ASAP.
Yeah , him curbstomping the abstracts has to be in there somewhere in some form.
Another thing that im curious about is , who will take Silver Surfers place? I know Adam Warlock is coming so who will warlocks companion be? Maybe Captain Marvel?
Originally posted by Inhumanhe could be a "ghost" haunting Wanda or even just a memory. I guess the gauntlet could do something to bring him back.
Good theory , but I think QS will be back. I think i read a while back A.T Johnson signed for multiple movies. Maybe they bring him back with that tech that patched up hawkeye. If not then another way via infinity stones shenanigans.
^ Thanos uses the Soul Gem and tempts Wanda with his resurrection to betray the Avengers for the final gem. Calling it.
BTW, that combined with Vision's scene definitely made the movie for me. Genius.
So, it's looking like Avengers will get around 450-500 domestic total. Monday had a 75% drop, which is bad for this type of movie. I guess word of mouth was just OK and Whedon erased his Twitter account, because of the backlash. 😂
What did you say to him, Whitewitchking?
That or the novelty wore off. 🙁