Ex-Gay Pride The Truth About Homosexuality

Originally posted by focus4chumps
ok then why all this spectacle?

What spectacle?

Originally posted by focus4chumps
he's likely following the philosophy of "if i can save just one person, then it was worth all the effort." of course even by this it still means that it was not worth all the effort.

I can't save anyone, that's Jesus' job. But a soul coming to Christ is exceedingly worth all the effort.

Luke 15:10
Likewise, I say to you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.”

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=14427173#post14427173

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=583683&pagenumber=4#post14431185

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=422284&pagenumber=12#post14425890

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=453885

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=454267&pagenumber=32#post14425895

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=421020&pagenumber=9#post14425925

Boy's Parents Murdered by His Grandfather

YouTube video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkPp58A1I4Q

Feeling suicidal? Read the tract below:

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0052/0052_01.asp (No Fear)

makes me wonder "what silly semantics games would jesus play?"

Originally posted by focus4chumps
makes me wonder "what silly semantics games would jesus play?"

Is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with my own things? Or is your eye evil because I am doing good?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14431186#post14431186

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with my own things?

i dont recall legality being an issue.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Or is your eye evil because I am doing good?

oh great so now you're accusing me of throwing bad juju on you?how melodramatic bro.

i was simply pointing out that you are wasting energy and reaching precisely nobody (except yourself of course).

Originally posted by focus4chumps
i dont recall legality being an issue.

oh great so now you're accusing me of throwing bad juju on you?how melodramatic bro.

i was simply pointing out that you are wasting energy and reaching precisely nobody (except yourself of course).

Okay. I appreciate your concern. But it isn't necessary for you to worry about me wasting energy and reaching precisely nobody. But I am trying to prevent things like this:

http://tv.yahoo.com/blogs/tv-news/report--former-disney-channel-star-lee-thompson-young-found-dead-182359895.html

I don't want even one soul to die and enter eternity without a personal relationship with Jesus Christ through faith.

Moreover, I have plenty of energy. Again, thanks for the concern.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14431186#post14431186

The "Ex-Gays" Had A Huge Press Conference In Washington Today (For Fewer Than Ten People)

Did you all hear? There was a HUGE “ex-gay” press conference in Washington today. SO MANY PEOPLE!

Just kidding, there were fewer than ten people there. Big movement y’all got there. But they didn’t leave before debuting the new “ex-gay” cheer, which, honestly, if they hadn’t, I would have had to make one up for them myself.

Christopher Doyle, the Uncle Fester of the “ex-gay” industry, who won’t tell us how old the girls were that he tried to have sex with at his mother’s daycare, threw the party, and Greg Quinlan of PFOX showed up (but NOT in a “flaming ******” way), and so did Doyle’s colleague Richard Cohen, and also Douglas McIntyre of Homosexuals Anonymous! Together they spoke to four or five other people and then they left.

Success! Seriously, look at this party:

Hoo-boy. Also, Chuck Peters, an alleged “ex-gay,” debuted this new cheer for their “movement,” which goes:

“HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS. HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS. HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS.”

This proves that when you go in to get de-gayed, they take all of the creativity and rhythm away from you as well.

YouTube video

Still sounds gay to me. It’s a pity the seven other people in attendance didn’t join in the cheer.

It’s even funnier because, as Right Wing Watch reports, Christopher Doyle talked to Sandy Rios yesterday, and Sandy confidently assured listeners that “thousands” of people would be showing up for this groundbreaking event. Stop laughing, she was being serious.

Christopher Doyle then explained that, in reality, there are “tens of thousands” of “ex-gays” out there, but they’re all scared to leave their houses because gay people are mean to them. Stop laughing, he really believes this stuff.

FEWER THAN TEN PEOPLE.

Good luck traveling home to your sad lives, guys.

I wonder how many of these "ex-gays" went public restroom cruising after the conference.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The "Ex-Gays" Had A Huge Press Conference In Washington Today (For Fewer Than Ten People)

Did you all hear? There was a HUGE “ex-gay” press conference in Washington today. SO MANY PEOPLE!

Just kidding, there were fewer than ten people there. Big movement y’all got there. But they didn’t leave before debuting the new “ex-gay” cheer, which, honestly, if they hadn’t, I would have had to make one up for them myself.

Christopher Doyle, the Uncle Fester of the “ex-gay” industry, who won’t tell us how old the girls were that he tried to have sex with at his mother’s daycare, threw the party, and Greg Quinlan of PFOX showed up (but NOT in a “flaming ******” way), and so did Doyle’s colleague Richard Cohen, and also Douglas McIntyre of Homosexuals Anonymous! Together they spoke to four or five other people and then they left.

Success! Seriously, look at this party:

Hoo-boy. Also, Chuck Peters, an alleged “ex-gay,” debuted this new cheer for their “movement,” which goes:

“HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS. HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS. HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS.”

This proves that when you go in to get de-gayed, they take all of the creativity and rhythm away from you as well.

YouTube video

Still sounds gay to me. It’s a pity the seven other people in attendance didn’t join in the cheer.

It’s even funnier because, as Right Wing Watch reports, Christopher Doyle talked to Sandy Rios yesterday, and Sandy confidently assured listeners that “thousands” of people would be showing up for this groundbreaking event. Stop laughing, she was being serious.

Christopher Doyle then explained that, in reality, there are “tens of thousands” of “ex-gays” out there, but they’re all scared to leave their houses because gay people are mean to them. Stop laughing, he really believes this stuff.

FEWER THAN TEN PEOPLE.

Good luck traveling home to your sad lives, guys.

I have 3 questions for you:

1. That post seems a bit much, don't you think?

2. Do you strongly dislike the fact that there are people out there that once identified as "homosexual" that now identify as "heterosexual"?

3. Is your self-identity tied very closely to your sexuality making positions like his offensive or rather, is your sexual identity predicted on the idea of an invariable sexuality?

Just to be clear, I think sexuality can be dynamic...mostly because of science.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4056398

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I wonder how many of these "ex-gays" went public restroom cruising after the conference.

😆

Originally posted by dadudemon

3. Is your self-identity tied very closely to your sexuality making positions like his offensive?

a clever way of evading the fact the the purpose of these 'ex-gays' its to 'prove' that homosexuality is a choice via anecdotal evidence of all 9 people at this apparent rally.

they are not simply expressing pride over their supposed redefining their sexual orientation but rather trying to delegitimize all homosexuals as equal citizens...based on their likely decision to not have enjoyable sex anymore.

how would you feel about an 'ex mormon' rally where people declare that their lives have been turned around by rejecting mormonism on the grounds that its unnatural and evil? all good man?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
“HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS. HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS. HIP HIP HURRAY FOR EX-GAYS.”

😂

I smiled at your whole post, but this was the best part.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
a clever way of evading the fact the the purpose of these 'ex-gays' its to 'prove' that homosexuality is a choice via anecdotal evidence of all 9 people at this apparent rally.

1. Evading? Why would my question be evading? Why can't the assumptions be left up to the person I am asking the question to rather than you adding erroneous assumptions?

2. Why is it not possible for people's sexual leanings to change over time when we have real research that shows this to be true?

3. When I am not at work, I'll actually give you my "real" response. 🙂

Originally posted by focus4chumps
they are not simply expressing pride over their supposed redefining their sexual orientation but rather trying to delegitimize all homosexuals as equal citizens...based on their likely decision to not have enjoyable sex anymore.

Forgive me for not being intimately farmiliar with all the perspectives of their movement. But, from what I saw, everything you said here was not covered in their "huge press-conference". Seemed they were wanting recognition and to stop the "abuse" they are getting. Now, I could be wrong in my superficial understanding of what they were trying to do. I'm just going by what they said.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
how would you feel about an 'ex mormon' rally where people declare that their lives have been turned around by rejecting mormonism on the grounds that its unnatural and evil? all good man?

lol

So all of these groups think that being gay is unnatural and evil?

Also, 😆 ...you clearly are not aware of the "anti-mormon" indstury that exists:

https://www.google.com/#fp=725f0c05b369ad6c&q=ex+mormon+support+group

The anti-Mormon movement has existed before they were even called "Mormons." The ex-Mormon stuff has existed since people could quit the church. There is nothing new, there. If a person is a Mormon and is not aware that people out their think Mormonism is an evil, depraved, or satanic cult, they definitely live sheltered lives. Like...really really sheltered.

Ex-Gay makes about as much sense as "Ex-Straight."

Originally posted by dadudemon
So all of these groups think that being gay is unnatural and evil?

Can you think of any that don't?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Can you think of any that don't?

Most of them?

Edit - For instance, one of the groups said/harped on "you don't stop being attracted to the same sex". I cannot get into while at work but I'll put it much more bluntly in about...4 hours.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Ex-Gay makes about as much sense as "Ex-Straight."

The study I posted, many of the participants in the sample reported "straight fantasies" in the beginning. As time went on, their sexuality changed and fantasies became more and more homosexual.

Unless you believe that it is only possible to go from pretty dang straight to pretty dang gay, it makes no sense to assume no one’s sexuality can never change from “gay” to “straight.” Yes, our choices and environment really do influence our sexuality. No one is “born gay” or "born straight." That’s just stupid.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=421020&pagenumber=9#post14432098

I have no idea what you're trying to say, JIA.

Are you passive-aggressively insinuating that, because a select group of homosexuals hate ex-homosexuals for converting to heterosexuality, the Bible's assertion of homosexuality as being a sinful practice is somehow proven valid?

This has got to be the most asinine and illogical statement I've ever seen.

I think people are arguing about a few different things.

Mostly my issue is this: Why 'Ex-Gay'? Why not just 'Straight'?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Ex-Gay makes about as much sense as "Ex-Straight."

it makes sense if you decide to believe that homosexuality is an addiction by choice based on the anecdotal evidence of 9 people who are rallying on capital hill. but we're supposed to pretend that none of this is obviously anti-homosexual in purpose...or else ddm's pseudo-objective sensibilities will be offended.

Originally posted by Dolos
I have no idea what you're trying to say, JIA.

Are you passive-aggressively insinuating that, because a select group of homosexuals hate ex-homosexuals for converting to heterosexuality, the Bible's assertion of homosexuality as being a sinful practice is somehow proven valid?

This has got to be the most asinine and illogical statement I've ever seen.

I just want those who are actively living the homosexual lifestyle to know that there is liberty from that abominable, sinful practice through Jesus Christ.

God has zero tolerance for the sin of homosexuality. Those who do such things will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven, so I want to point as many of those living that lifestyle to Jesus so that they can become free.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=421020&pagenumber=9#post14432098