Ex-Gay Pride The Truth About Homosexuality

Originally posted by focus4chumps
but its really something more like "if i drove by your house and you/your family was sleeping, but i noticed that you didnt have solar panels, a compost bin, and were clearly not recycling...how would you feel if i didn't bang on your door at 3 in the morning to let you know that i disapprove of your way of living."

Solar panels are a myth invented by Al Gore and scientists through the internets. Recycling is just another way for Obama and his cronies to steal your hard earned money to give to sick and dying childrens. Is you an idiot?

Originally posted by Existere
If it's going to make an actual discussion possible, please explain the position exactly as you understand it so we can ensure we're both on the same page.

Whoohoo!

Originally posted by dadudemon
I see part of the movement as a backlash against the "community" for trying to make sexuality seem ironclad. I cannot speak for all of it because I know very little.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Unless you believe that it is only possible to go from pretty dang straight to pretty dang gay, it makes no sense to assume no one’s sexuality can never change from “gay” to “straight.” Yes, our choices and environment really do influence our sexuality. No one is “born gay” or "born straight." That’s just stupid.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Just to be clear, I think sexuality can be dynamic...mostly because of science.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4056398

There are more groups than those that like to label themselves as part of the "LGBT community" that would fit into "community" as I used it.

So any group that chooses to be part of the community that puts forth the notion that sexuality is static would be anyone part of that community that the backlash, as mentioned in one of my quotes, would be against.

Can you think of any groups, outside of "LGBT", that might hold that sexuality is static?

If you can, there's your answer. If you can't, too bad, you'll just have to stick with LGBT as your only answer. 🙁

But, I warn against that conclusion: not everyone in the LGBT group thinks that sexuality is static. 😐

Let me know what else you'd like to not actually talk about.

Originally posted by Existere
If it's going to make an actual discussion possible[...]

well you asked for more logical backflips and so you got it.
and now you know to never presume that again.

my favorite was

"...trying to make sexuality seem ironclad", which of course is complete horsesh1t.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
"...trying to make sexuality seem ironclad", which of course is complete horsesh1t.

My bad. And here I was, reading and listening to people state that they were born gay or born straight. Back to the derp bus, with me, then. WEEE!

Originally posted by dadudemon
My bad. And here I was, reading and listening to people state that they were born gay or born straight. Back to the derp bus, with me, then. WEEE!

i dont recall it being unanimous in that LGBT community that all gay people were born gay and all bi people were born bi. i believed up till this point that it had something more to do with it not being a choice.

also i had believed that a person can have a genetic predisposition to something, and even developing it later in life. stuff like baldness, obesity, cancer...........puberty

save me a seat then.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
i dont recall it being unanimous in that LGBT community that all gay people were born gay and all bi people were born bi. i believed up till this point that it had something more to do with it not being a choice.

Originally posted by dadudemon
...not everyone in the LGBT group thinks that sexuality is static. 😐

👆

Originally posted by focus4chumps
save me a seat then.

The bus is full. You'll have to catch the next one. 🙁

nice dodge.

the wheels on the bus go round and round

Originally posted by focus4chumps
nice dodge.

the wheels on the bus go round and round

How is that a dodge when I stated it, myself?

😬 😬 😬 😬 😬 😬 😬

😬

Before you stated it.

Edit - Oh, you're doing that thing.

that paragraph you skipped over because it contradicts your narrative of "babies are not born sexually attracted to the same sex"

Originally posted by focus4chumps

also i had believed that a person can have a genetic predisposition to something, and even developing it later in life. stuff like baldness, obesity, cancer...........puberty

Originally posted by focus4chumps
that paragraph you skipped over because it contradicts your narrative of "babies are not born sexually attracted to the same sex"

You clearly don't know what "contradict" means.

"deny the truth of (a statement), esp. by asserting the opposite."

And when you decide to make a point that is not nonsensical and laughably stupid, let me know and we can discuss it.

Originally posted by dadudemon
But, I warn against that conclusion: not everyone in the LGBT group thinks that sexuality is static. 😐

Originally posted by Existere
Right, I agree. I don't actually think we're disagreeing on a lot here, I'm just trying to understand better your position (what community of people are saying sexuality is static, and what backlash is happening as a result?).

The answer to both parts of your question has been given, actually. Not sure what else you want me to say.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE

Practically speaking, it's all a gay menage-a-trois.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=583890&pagenumber=2#post14440165

Wasn't talking to you, dear.

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Practically speaking, it's all a gay menage-a-trois.

Digi, this is blaspemous, spam.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE

Digi, this is also blasphemous spam.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Digi, this is also blasphemous spam.

No one gives a flying **** about blaspheming your imaginary god.

JIA, isn't your posting the same links over and over also SPAM?

Also, we have freedom of religion in America, which is where I'm assuming you're from. Blasphemy is not illegal, nor is it particularly heinous. If we were living in medieval times, however, it would be very different for both of us. You would be a heretic for not being Catholic.

Practically speaking, I was joking - Not one that I really expect you to understand that.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Digi, this is also blasphemous spam.

No one cares about blasphemy. And it isn't spam. Since it is neither advertisement, nor repeatedly reposted.

In fact, it is scripturally true, and somewhat on topic of this thread.