As a main villain compare Zant's competence to Ganondorf's

Started by quanchi1125 pages

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Snd how did zant use his powers more effectively?
Taking over Hyrule and handing Link and Midna their asses.

Following ganondorf's orders. He did the exact same thing to a stronger midna and link.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Following ganondorf's orders. He did the exact same thing to a stronger midna and link.
He was competent unlike Dorf. That is the point not jurisdiction or who was in charge. That isn't the point and your inability to understand a simple thread premise explains a lot about you, scream.

Ok, I'm trying to understand this. Ganondorf is stronger, smarter, has the plan, and everything zant did was because of Ganondorf, and zant is the competent one? Zant wasn't the one who took over hyrule, he was just leading the charge.Why is zant the ccompetent one?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Snd how did zant use his powers more effectively?
Accomplishing his tasks.

And ganondorf didn't?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
And ganondorf didn't?
Was being bfr'd a goal ? Was beating Link a goal ? Pathetic and two battles and he was sent on his way.

His goal was to take over hyrule. Who was sitting in the throne before the final fight? Was it's zant's goak to explode, cause he 'sploded...

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
His goal was to take over hyrule. Who was sitting in the throne before the final fight? Was it's zant's goak to explode, cause he 'sploded...
Zant took over Hyrule. Ganondorf lost both times he showed up raising hell on Hyrule. Zant was the competent one whereas Ganondorf was the ignorant boob.

Actually he only tried to take over hyrule once in TP's timeline and he took over hyrule using shadow beasts and an easily controlled mook named zant. Zant however was unable to take over the twilight without ganondorf's help.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Actually he only tried to take over hyrule once in TP's timeline and he took over hyrule using shadow beasts and an easily controlled mook named zant. Zant however was unable to take over the twilight without ganondorf's help.
Zant needed the power but achieved his goals. Ganondorf got beat, found out he had the Triforce of power backing him to get beat again. Then he came back to Hyrule in his possession to blow it.

What a worthless, incompetent villain.

... I don't think yoi know what that word means.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
... I don't think yoi know what that word means.
Dorf was incompetent but powerful due to the top. That's it in a nutshell.

Dorf wanted to escape the twilight, he escaped the twilight. Dorf wanted to take over hyrule, he took over hyrule. Competent.

Zant wanted to take over the twilight, couldn't do it without ganondorf's help. Incompetent.

I really don't see how you can have so much hate for a franchise?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Dorf wanted to escape the twilight, he escaped the twilight. Dorf wanted to take over hyrule, he took over hyrule. Competent.

Zant wanted to take over the twilight, couldn't do it without ganondorf's help. Incompetent.

I really don't see how you can have so much hate for a franchise?

He did through Zant. Zant was the competent one who conquered Hyrule and allowed him to escape. Without Zant Dorf was screwed.

Zant lacked the power the top had. Dorf was basically a plot device who was an idiot and someone easily beatable.

😂

The puppet or the puppeteer?

The pawn or the king?

The lapdog or the master?

Tough call..

Zant was a puppet and he didn't do anything but point the shadow beasts at hyrule castle. Why the sudden interest in zant? Did find that only zrlda characters are strong enough to take out ganondorf?

Another biased poster comes forward. Shocking.

... I thought the laptop was the master?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
... I thought the laptop was the master?
Zant did what Ganondorf cannot. The top provided the power not Dorf. Plot device as left to his own devices he was shit.