Originally posted by h1a8
not a forum fight. Battle distance is only .5 km away. Even in a real fight, no one is going to let brb fly away light years and sit there and allow brb to ram them from light years away.
😂
Bill didn't fly away and ram into Stardust from light years away and Stardust didn't let Bill do anything:
And someone doesn't have to just "sit there" for Bill to put him on the receiving end of that f*cking shit.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusI was going to say carry them but I couldn't remember the exact details of the fight. Plus they were already charged with energy.
😂Stardust didn't let Bill do anything:
And someone doesn't have to just "sit there" to be on the receiving end of that f*cking shit.
My point is, hitting someone with planet busting force in mid battle is different than carrying them to a planet from far away. Most peers or higher isn't just going to allow themselves to be carried into a planet without incident, unless they are out of it like stardust was.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
...........That "planet" was the size of a beach ball.
😐
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763875/actioncomics770p30.jpg.html
What about "Joker making the universe go boom by compressing it down to infinite gravity" do you not understand? Mxy said it on panel.
facepalm
Its like I have to spoon feed some of you.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Proof the planets were getting denser? As you well know:Density = Mass/Volume.
Their Volume was definitely decreasing. If their Mass was constant, then surely the planetoids were super dense or something.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I just don't think anything from that storyline is really admissible as a feat of strength/durability/speed, seeing as the rules of physics were all breaking down. Unless its explicitly stated, for all we know, Density = Mass/Fish at that point.Just my 2 cents.
And that's why that feat is so much better than mere planet busting. He was operating in a gravity field which reduced entire suns into this size.
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763868/actioncomics770p26.jpg.html
And yet, he was totally fine and destroyed a planet. But hey, that sun was superman's size. That means it wasn't a sun at all.
🙄
Originally posted by abhilegend
That's some really twisted logic if I ever saw one. The universe sure as heck was going to get compressed in a singularity of infinite gravity, if that doesn't shows laws of physics I don't know what will.And that's why that feat is so much better than mere planet busting. He was operating in a gravity field which reduced entire suns into this size.
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763868/actioncomics770p26.jpg.html
And yet, he was totally fine and destroyed a planet. But hey, that sun was superman's size. That means it wasn't a sun at all.
🙄
Twisted logic....yes.....almost as if I'm ignoring the rules of physics in a storyline where the rules of physics were being ignored. You're applying RL logic and comics to scenes where the Joker was altering reality and altering physics, and you still want to argue that physics applied?
Surely you have other examples of Superman's world breaking strength?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Twisted logic....yes.....almost as if I'm ignoring the rules of physics in a storyline where the rules of physics were being ignored. You're applying RL logic and comics to scenes where the Joker was altering reality and altering physics, and you still want to argue that physics applied?Surely you have other examples of Superman's world breaking strength?
If you don't like the feat, I don't care. But discarding the feat on an assumption is stupid. Where was it stated that all of laws of physics were twisted? And why would Joker compress the universe to infinite gravity and change all the other laws? Do you just like an excuse to discard a feat or what?
There are, but why bother when people would just nit-pick it like they have in the past? Like the scene where the "world was shattered" was said six times, but it was still not accepted?
Originally posted by The SorrowSuperman has feats that are beyond planet destroying. It takes less than one Earth weight of force to destroy a planet. Superman has feats beyond 50 earth weights of force. So in reality, he too has world breaker power.
I'm sure one day Superman will perform a legit planet destroying feat and make it to this exclusive list... One day...
To say that Superman never displayed the power of busting a planet is like saying lifting a tank isn't proof that one can lift a car.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman destroyed a planet by smashing Emperor Joker on it.http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763867/actioncomics770p25.jpg.html
And Superman wasn't getting bigger, the planets were shrinking due to Joker shrinking the universe.
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763917/actioncomics770p22-1.jpg.html
So, its a legit planet busting feat.
👆
Might as well reference Superman #675.
Originally posted by h1a8
Superman has feats that are beyond planet destroying. It takes less than one Earth weight of force to destroy a planet. Superman has feats beyond 50 earth weights of force. So in reality, he too has world breaker power.To say that Superman never displayed the power of busting a planet is like saying lifting a tank isn't proof that one can lift a car.
Originally posted by h1a8
Superman can simply bust out of it since he is stronger than Odin. Yes superman is a lot stronger than Thor, by feats, and in turn 2x Thor (pg Thor).
Your Superman can defeat anyone or perform any feat H1 because he doesn't exist in comics.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Where did he destroy anything planet like in that issue?
You didn't read it?
http://i.imgur.com/vH4Grdu.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ssRL5Lk.jpg
It was inside the Galactic Golem, though.
Originally posted by operator616
You didn't read it?http://i.imgur.com/vH4Grdu.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ssRL5Lk.jpgIt was inside the Galactic Golem, though.
So its a planet busting feat I guess.
