Khan vs ozymandias

Started by Dolos5 pages

Khan rips the pansy of comprise's head off and shits down his throat.

**** the blond *****-MADE!

Khan, ftw.

Can you get me a dime bag of whatever you're smoking?

I wasn't aware they sold crack in dime bags.

Dolos is probably on that molly.

Originally posted by KingD19
I wasn't aware they sold crack in dime bags.
Ofc they do.

As far as strength goes, Ozy's blows can send full grown men hurling across an entire room-- don't recall Khan displaying that type of strength.

As far as speed goes, Ozy is fast enough to bullet-time from point blank range-- don't recall Khan ever displaying that type of speed.

As far as fighting skill goes, Ozy simultaneously owned 3 very adept MA's(Nite Owl, Rorschach, and Silk Spectre) like they were talentless feebs.

The only area in which Khan has the distinct advantage is damage soak/regen. Because of that, it's hard to say if Ozy could put him down long enough to constitute a KO. Based on what we saw, however, Ozy should still be able to beat the christ out of him. /shrug

You sound like you want Ozymandias inside all your holes, Galan.

😂

Originally posted by KingD19
To be fair, his glove was armored in the movie. And I don't think that was a .357

Maybe a .38 or something but not a .357

YouTube video

:edit: looks like a 357 to me. no way of knowing so lets just agree its a gun.

I don't think it's a gun.

if quan was here we'd learn how it only shot fairy dust at ozy so khan wins.

He's a once in a lifetime genius.

The gun Silk Spectre used to shoot Veidt with was a Smith & Wesson Model 10, .38 rounds.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
YouTube video

:edit: looks like a 357 to me. no way of knowing so lets just agree its a gun.

Well the .357 isn't even a gun. It's an ammo type. So there's no way to gauge. But, a .357 more than likely would have put a hole in his hand and done mor than spun him around.

Originally posted by KingD19
Well the .357 isn't even a gun. It's an ammo type.

are you trolling? its both.

Ozymandias wins.

Smarter, faster, stronger, and better looking.

No homo.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
are you trolling? its both.

No. I'm being serious.

.357 is an ammunition classification, specifically created to for law enforcement to have a better bullet to pierce body armor and armored car doors that criminals and gangsters were using in the 30's. Normal rounds were crap, and the .38 Special was barely cutting it. But the .357 punched through them like Tyson through guards.

There are several revolvers that are specifically made to shoot .357 rounds, like the Colt Python and MP412-Rex, which are usually classified as "Magnums" or "Magnum Revolvers" as that's the ammunition they use, but there is no such thing as a 357 Magnum Revolver.

WRONG. a 357 is a type of round as well as a type of gun. just google for 357 pistols before replying, please.

also, you can fire 38 rounds from a 357 (same diameter casing) but you cant do vice versa, because a 357 round is too powerful (as well as too long). maybe thats where you are confused.

Almost any type of gun you purchase will be referenced by its caliber type AND specific model #. I can tell you this with confidence, because I own several guns(including a .357mag), and all of them are labeled this way. Example: The label Taurus stamped/engraved on the side of my .357mag is: "Taurus 605 .357 Magnum." So yes, the physical gun can absolutely be referenced as a ".357 Magnum." And like f4c said: you can fire .38spc ammunition through a .357mag frame, but you cannot fire .357mag ammunition through a .38spc frame-- this is due to the HUGE difference in ballistic energy these ammunitions release.

That said, the bullet Ozy caught could have been a .38spc round, fired from a .357mag frame. Even if that was the case, it is still an excellent speed/bullet-timing feat, given that a .38spc round travels between 850-900fps, and he caught it at point blank range. If it was a .357mag round, then the feat becomes even more impressive, as a .357mag round travels between 1,150-1,250fps.

Anywho, hopefully that cleared up the unneeded confusion.